Beyond Cheerleading: Navigating the Boundaries of Science Journalism in South Africa

References

• Angler, M. W. 2017. Science Journalism: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Autzen, C. 2014. “Press Releases: The New Trend in Science Communication.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C02.
   Google Scholar
• Autzen, C. 2018. “Academic Press Releases Caught between Theory and Practice: Making Sense of a Contested Science Communication Practice.” PhD dissertation, University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Autzen, C., and E. Weitkamp. 2020. “Science Communication and Public Relations: Beyond Borders.” In Science Communication, edited by A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, and T. Gloning, 465–584. Boston: DeGruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Badenschier, F., and H. Wormer. 2012. “Issue Selection in Science Journalism: Towards a Special Theory of News Values for Science News?” In The Sciences’ Media Connection–Public Communication and its Repercussions, edited by S. Rödder, M. Franzen and P. Weingart, 59–85. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., S. Howard, R. Romo, J. Yuyle, L. Massarani, and L. Amorim. 2013. Global Science Journalism Report: Working Conditions & Practices, Professional Ethos and Future Expectations. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, D. 2021. “Science Journalism Grows Up.” Science 372 (6540): 323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchelt, R. E., and K. H. Nielsen. 2014. “Public Relations in Science: Managing the Trust Portfolio.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by M. Bucchi, and B. Trench, 58–69. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, T. 2007. Health, Risk and News. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D. 2013. “New Media Landscapes and the Science Information Consumer.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Suppl. 3): 14096–140101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., I. Lörcher, and S. Walter. 2020. “Post-Normal Science Communication: Exploring the Blurring Boundaries of Science and Journalism.” JCOM 19 (03): A02.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, T. 2019. “Revisiting the Role of the Science Journalist.” Undark Magazine. https://undark.org/2019/07/15/science-journalism-communications/.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. 2014. “Public Communication from Research Institutes: Is It Science Communication or Public Relations?” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C01. doi:10.22323/2.13030301.
   Google Scholar
• Cheerleader or Watchdog? 2009, June 25. Nature 459 (7250): 1033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claassen, G. 2011. “Science and the Media in South Africa: Reflecting a ‘Dirty Mirror’.” Communicatio 37 (3): 351–366.
   Google Scholar
• Claessens, M. 2014. “Research Institutions: Neither Doing Science Communication Nor Promoting “Public” Relations.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C03.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, J., and M. Joubert. 2012. “The Need for an African Science News Service.” Prepared on behalf of SciDev.Net for the UK National Commission of UNESCO. http://www.southernscience.co.za/downloads/african_news_service_need.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, J. 1999. “Report: Second World Conference of Science Journalists Meets in Budapest.” Science Communication 21 (2): 200–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, N. 2009. Flat Earth News. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., S. Franks, J. Roche, A. L. Schmidt, R. Wells, and F. Zollo. 2021. “The Landscape of European Science Communication.” Journal of Science Communication 20: 3. doi:10.22323/2.20030201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. 2002. “Public Relations, News Production and Changing Patterns of Source Access in the British National Media.” Media, Culture & Society 22: 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, C. 2009. Am I Making Myself Clear? A Scientist’s Guide to Talking to the Public. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudo, A. 2015. “Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science.” Sociology Compass 9 (9): 761–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., L. Kahlor, N. AbiGhannam, A. Lazard, and M. Liang. 2014. “An Analysis of Nanoscientists as Public Communicators.” Nature Nanotechnology 9 (10): 841–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. 2002. “Wired Science: Use of World Wide Web and e-Mail in Science Public Relations.” Public Relations Review 28 (3): 311–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S. 2020. “Science Journalism.” In Science Communication, edited by A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, and T. Gloning, 417–438. Boston: DeGruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S. 2021. “Science Journalism: Prospects in the Digital Age.” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by M. Bucchi, and B. Trench, 14–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Entradas, M., M. W. Bauer, C. O'Muircheartaigh, F. Marcinkowski, A. Okamura, G. Pellegrini, J. Besley, et al. 2020. “Public Communication by Research Institutes Compared Across Countries and Sciences: Building Capacity for Engagement or Competing for Visibility?” PLoS One 15 (7): e0235191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUSJA. 2019. “About EUSJA.” EUSJA Website. http://www.eusja.org/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, D., and M. Nisbet. 2011. “The Science Journalist Online: Shifting Roles and Emerging Practices.” Public Understanding of Science 12 (7): 778–793.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göpfert, W. 2007. “The Strength of PR and the Weakness of Science Journalism’.” In Journalism, Science and Society: Between News and Public Relations, edited by M. W. Bauer, and M. Bucchi, 215–226. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J., and S. Miller. 1998. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, L. 2019. “Science Journalism.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.901.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., J. Bischoff, A. Löwe, H. Marzinkowski, and M. Voigt. 2019. “Scientific Evidence and Science Journalism: Analysing the Representation of (Un) Certainty in German Print and Online Media.” Journalism Studies 20 (1): 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., and M. Joubert. 2021. “Novel Interfaces in Science Communication: Comparing Journalistic and Social Media Uptake of Articles Published by The Conversation Africa.” Public Understanding of Science 30 (8): 1041–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyl, A., M. Joubert, and L. Guenther. 2020. “Churnalism and Hype in Science Communication: Comparing University Press Releases and Journalistic Articles in South Africa.” Communicatio: South African Journal of Communication Theory and Research 46 (2): 126–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert, M. 2019. “WCSJ2019: Scaling New Heights in Switzerland.” Journal of Science Communication 18 (04): R01.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S., M. S. Schäfer, and S. Lorencez. 2016. “Science Journalists in Switzerland: Results From a Survey on Professional Goals, Working Conditions, and Current Changes.” Studies in Communication Sciences 16 (2): 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J. 2016. “The Continuing Convergence of Journalism and PR: New Insights for Ethical Practice from a Three-Country Study of Senior Practitioners.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (1): 118–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiden, N., K. Zachos, S. Franks, R. Wells, and S. Stallard. 2020. “Designing Digital Content to Support Science Journalism.” NordiCHI ‘20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkowski, F., and M. Kohring. 2014. “The Changing Rationale of Science Communication: A Challenge to Scientific Autonomy.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C04.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkowski, F., M. Kohring, S. Furst, and A. Friedrichsmeier. 2014. “Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public: An Empirical Investigation.” Science Communication 36 (1): 56–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. 1995. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., and M. Tran. 2019. “Science Journalism for Development in the Global South: A Systematic Literature Review of Issues and Challenges.” Public Understanding of Science 28 (8): 973–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygaard, S. 2020. “Boundary Work: Intermedia Agenda-Setting Between Right-Wing Alternative Media and Professional Journalism.” Journalism Studies 21 (6): 766–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., and H. Joffe. 2020. “Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, doi:10.1177/1609406919899220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, K., and S. Cunningham. 2020. “Amplifier’ Platforms and Impact: Australian Scholars’ Use of The Conversation’.” Australian Universities Review 62 (1): 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. 2012. “Scientific Sources and the Mass Media: Forms and Consequences of Medialization.” In The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and its Repercussions, edited by S. Rödder, M. Franzen, and P. Weingart, 217–239. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. 2013. “Gap Between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Suppl. 3): 14102–14109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters, H. P., D. Brossard, S. De Cheveigne, S. Dunwoody, M. Kallfass, S. Miller, and S. Tsuchida. 2008. “Interactions with the Mass Media.” Science 321 (5886): 204–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QUEST. 2020. Deliverable 1.1 Summary Report Science Communication Today. https://questproject.eu/download/deliverable-1-1-summary-report-european-science-communication-today/.
   Google Scholar
• Rödder, S. 2011. “Science and the Mass Media – ‘Medialization’ as a New Perspective on an Intricate Relationship.” Sociology Compass 5 (9): 834–845.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, C., L. Guenther, and K. Froehlich. 2016. “The Question of Newsworthiness: A Cross-Comparison Among Science Journalists’ Selection Criteria in Argentina, France, and Germany.” Science Communication 38 (3): 328–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ-Mohl, S. 1999. “Spoonfeeding, Spinning, Whistleblowing.” In Wie die Medien die Wirklichkeit steuern und selber gesteuert warden, edited by L. Rolke, and V. Wolff, 163–176. Wiesbaden: Opladen.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. 2011. “Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: A Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research.” Sociology Compass 5 (6): 399–412.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. 2017. “How Changing Media Structures Are Affecting Science News Coverage’.” In Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, edited by K. Jamieson, D. Kahan, and D. Scheufele, 51–60. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schünemann, S. 2013. “12 Science Journalism.” In Specialist Journalism, edited by B. Turner, and R. Orange, 134. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, S. D. 2011. “Scientists’ Communication with the General Public: An Australian Survey.” Doctoral dissertation. Canberra, Australia: The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Secko, D. M., E. Amend, and T. Friday. 2013. “Four Models of Science Journalism: A Synthesis and Practical Assessment.” Journalism Practice 7 (1): 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, M. 2015. Handbook for Science Public Information Officers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Summ, A., and A. M. Volpers. 2016. “What’s Science? Where’s Science? Science Journalism in German Print Media’.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (7): 775–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench, B. 2009. “Science Reporting in the Electronic Embrace of the Internet.” In Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, edited by R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, and J. Thomas, 166–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Väliverronen, E. 2021. “Mediatisation of Science and the Rise of Promotional Culture.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by M. Bucchi, and B. Trench, 129–146. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hout, T., and S. Van Leuven. 2016. “Investigating ‘Churnalism’ in Real-Time News.” In Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited by B. Franklin, and S. Edridge, 117–125. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, D., and M. S. Schäfer. 2020. “Growing Influence of University PR on Science News Coverage? A Longitudinal Automated Content Analysis of University Media Releases and Newspaper Coverage in Switzerland, 2003–2017.” International Journal of Communication 14: 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigold, M. F. 2001. “Communicating Science: A Review of the Literature.” Science Communication 23 (2): 164–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 1998. “Science and the Media.” Research Policy 27 (8): 869–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 2017. “Is There a Hype Problem in Science? If So, How is it Addressed?” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by K. H. Jamieson, D. Kahan, and D. Scheufele, 111–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., and L. Guenther. 2016. “Science Communication and the Issue of Trust.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (05): C01.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., and M. Joubert. 2019. “The Conflation of Motives of Science Communication—Causes, Consequences, Remedies.” Journal of Science Communication 18 (3): Y01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitkamp, E. 2014. “On the Roles of Scientists, Press Officers and Journalists.” Journal of Science Communication 13: 3.
   Google Scholar
• WFSJ. 2021. A Brief History of the WFSJ. WFSJ website. https://wfsj.org/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and S. Gajevic. 2013. “Selling Science?” Journalism Studies 14 (4): 507–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar