1,200
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Policy Review

Housing policies in Latin America: overview of the four largest economies

&

References

  • Andrade, L.A.G., & Azevedo, S. (1982). Habitação e poder – Da Fundação da casa popular ao Banco Nacional da habitação. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
  • Arellano, J. (1982). Polllano, de Vivienda Popular: Lecciones de la Experiencia Chilena [Social Housing, Lessons from Chilean Experience]. Colección Estudios Cieplan, 9, 41–73.
  • Arismendi, I. (1983). Gobernantes Colombianos [Colombian Governors]. Bogotá: Interprint Editorial.
  • Bedi, J., & Borsdorf, A. (2005). La Ciudad Latinoamericana. La Construcción de un Modelo. Vigencias y Perspectivas [The Latin American City. Building a Model]. ur[b]es, 2(2), 207–221.
  • Barreto, M.A. (2012). Cambios y Continuidades en La Política de Vivienda Argentina (2003-2007) [Continuity and Change in Argentina's Housing Policies (2003-2007)]. Cuardernos de Vivienda y Urbanismo, 5(9), 12–30.
  • Bengtsson B., & Ruonavara H. (2010). Path dependence in housing: Introduction to the special issue. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(3), 193–203.
  • Blakeley, E., & Snyder, M. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Blanco, A. Cibils V., & Muñoz A. (2014). Rental housing wanted: Policy options for Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Boldarini, Arquitetura e Urbanismo (ed). (2008). Urbanizaçãb de Favelas: A Experiência de São Paulo. São Paulo: Prefeitura.
  • Bonduki, N. (2008). Política habitacional e inclusão social no Brasil: revisão histórica e novas perspectivas no governo Lula. ARQ.URB – Revista Eletrônica de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, 1, 70–104.
  • Borsdorf, A., Hidalgo, R., & Sanchez, R. (2008). Model of urban development in Latin America: The gated communities and fenced cities in metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaíso. Cities, 24(5), 365–378.
  • Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., & Menendez, M. (2007). Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(4), 585–618.
  • Brain, I., & Sabatini, F. (2006). Relación Entre Mercados de Suelo y Política de Vivienda Social [Land Markets and Social Housing Policies]. ProUrbana, 4(may issue), 1–13.
  • Budds, J., Teixeira, P., & SEHAB. (2005). Ensuring the right to the city: Pro-poor housing, urban development and tenure legalisation in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environment and Urbanisation, 17, 89–113.
  • Cardoso, A.L., & Leal, J.A. (2010). Housing Markets in Brazil: Recent Trends and Governmental Responses to the 2008 Crisis. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(2), 191–208.
  • Carrira Barrero, G.A. (2008). Debilidades del Nivel Regional en el Ordenamineto Territorial Colombiano. Aproximación desde la Normatividad Política Administrativa y de Usos de Suelo [Weaknesses in Land Use Planning in Colombia]. Architecture, City and Environment, 3(7), 145–166.
  • Castañeda, J. (2006). Latin America's left turn. Foreign Affairs, 85(3), 28–43.
  • Ceballos Ramos O., & Saldariaga Roa, A. (2008a). La Institucionalización de la Acción Estatal Frente al Problema de la Vivienda (1942–1965) [State Action on Housing Problems]. In O. Ceballos Ramos (Ed.), Vivienda Social en Colombia: Una Mirada Desde su Legislación 1918-2005 [Social Housing in Colombia]. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  • Ceballos Ramos O., & Saldariaga Roa, A. (2008b). La Transición en el Manejo Institutional del Problema de la Vivienda 1965–1972 [Transition in Hosuing Management between 1965–1972]. In O. Ceballos Ramos (Ed.), Vivienda Social en Colombia: Una Mirada Desde su Legislación 1918–200 [Social Housing in Colombia]. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  • Ceballos Ramos O., & Saldariaga Roa, A. (2008c). La Creación de las Corporaciones de Ahorro y Vivienda 1972–1990) [Development of House Savings Corporations]. In O. Ceballos Ramos (Ed.), Vivienda Social en Colombia: Una Mirada Desde su Legislación 1918–2005. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  • Cetrangolo O., & Goldschmit A. (2013). La Descentralización y el Financiamiento de Políticas Sociales Eficaces: Impactos Desafíos y Reformas. El Caso de la Argentina [Decentralisation and Finance of Hosuing Policies in Argentina]. CEPAL, Serie Macroeconomía y Desarrollo. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/9/52069/Ladescentralizacionyelfinanciamiento.pdf
  • Chiape de Villa, M.L. (1999). La Política de Vivienda de Interés Social en Colombia en Los Noventa [Social Housing during the 1990's]. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
  • Chomsky, N. (2010). Hopes and prospects. London: Hamish Hamilton.
  • Clapham, D. (1995). Privatisation and the East European Housing Model. Urban Studies, 32(4/5), 679–694.
  • Clapham, D. (2006). Housing policy and the discourse of globalization. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), 55–76.
  • Clift, J. (2003). Hearing the dogs bark. Jeremy Clift interviews development guru Hernando de Soto. IMF Papers, Finance & Development. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2003/12/pdf/people.pdf
  • Collier, D. (1978). Industrial modernisation and political change: A Latin American Perspective. World Politics, 30, 593–614.
  • Collins, J., & Lear, J. (1995). Chile's free market miracle: A second look. Oakland, CA: Institute for Food and Development Policy.
  • Coy, M., & Poy, M.M. (2002). Gated communities in Latin American megacities: Case studies in Brazil and Argentina. Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 29, 355–370.
  • Cuenya, B. (2005). Cambios, Logros y Conflictos en La Política de Vivienda en Argentina Hacia Fines del Siglo XXl [Changes and Conflicts in Social Housing Policies in Argentina at the end of the 21st Century]. Boletín X Ciudades Para un Futuro más Sostenible, 29/30, unpaginated.
  • Cuervo, N., & Jaramillo, S. (2009). Dos Décadas de Política de Vivienda en Bogotá, Apostando por el Mercado [Two decades of Housing Policies in Bogota]. Universidad de Los Andes, Documentos CEDE, 31, 1–36.
  • de Duren, N. (2006). Planning à la Carte: The location patterns of gated communities around Buenos Aires in a decentralised planning context. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(2), 308–327.
  • de Soto, H. (2001). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. London: Black Swan.
  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2010). Time for equality: Closing gaps, opening trails. Thirty-third Session of ECLAC. Brasilia; 30 May to 1 June.
  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2012). Structural change for equality: An integrated approach to development. Thirty-four Session of ECLAC. San Salvador; 27–31 August.
  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2014). Compacts for equality. Towards a sustainable future. Thirty-fifth Session of ECLAC. Lima; 5–9 May.
  • Edwards, S. (2010). Left behind: Latin America and the false promise of populism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Escobar, G. (2001). La Vivienda en Colombia en el Cambio de Siglo [Housing in Colombia at the turn of the Century]. In Peter Brand & Fernando Viviescas (Eds.), Trayectorias Urbanas en la Modernización del Estado en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia y Tercer Mundo Editores.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Fernandes, E. (2002). The influence of de Soto's the mystery of capital. Land Lines, 14, 4–7.
  • Fernandes, E. (2007). Constructing the “Right to the City” in Brazil. Social & Legals Studies, 16(2), 201–219.
  • Fonseca, M.A.R. (1998). Brazil's real plan. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30, 619–639.
  • Formoso, C., Leite, F., & Miron, L. (2011). Client requirements management in social housing: A case Study on the residential leasing programme in Brazil. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 16(2), 47–67.
  • Frankema, E.H.P. (2006). The colonial roots of Latin American land inequality in a global comparative perspective: Factor endowments, institutions or political economy? Paper of the Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen. Retrieved from http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/seminars/papers/186/1861.pdf
  • Fukuyama, F. (2008). Falling behind: Explaining the development gap between Latin America and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Garcia de Freitas, F., & Cunha, P. (2013). Chile: Subsidies, credit and housing deficit. Cepal Review, 110, 189–211.
  • Gilbert, A. (2002). Power, ideology and the Washington consensus: The development and spread of the Chilean housing policy. Housing Studies, 17(2), 305ies I.
  • Gilbert, A.G. (1997). On subsidies and homeownership: Colombian housing policy during the 1990s. Third World Planning Review, 19, 51–70.
  • González, I., & Martner, R. (2012). Superando el “Síndrome del Casillero Vacío” determinantes de la distribución del ingreso en América Latina [Income Distribution Indicators in Latin America]. Revista CEPAL, 108, 7–25.
  • Green, M., & Ortúzar, J. (2002). Willingness to pay for social housing attributes: A case study from Chile. International Planning Studies, 7(1), 55–87.
  • Hidalgo, R. (2007). Se Acabó el Suelo en la Gran Ciudad? Las Nuevas Periferias Metropolitanas de la Vivienda Social en Santiago de Chile [New Metropolitan Perphery and Social Hosuing, No more land in large cities?]. Eure, 33(98), (mayo), 57–75.
  • Hidalgo, R., & Sánchez, R. (2007). A new model of urban development in Latin America: The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valapraíso. Cities, 24(5), 365–378.
  • Kowaltowski, D.C., da Silva, V.G., Pina, S.A., Labaki, L.C., Ruschel, R.C., & Moreira, D.C. (2006). Quality of life and sustainability issues as seen by the population of low-income housing in the region of Campinas, Brazil. Habitat International, 30(4), 1100–1114.
  • Kusnetzoff, F. (1987). Urban and housing policies under Chile's military dictatorship, 1973–1985. Latin American Perspectives, 53, 157–186.
  • Lima, J. (2006). Social housing attributes: A case study from Chile. In R. Zetter & G. Butina Watson (Eds.), Designing sustainable cities in the developing world (pp. 57–75). Hampshire: Ashgate.
  • Macario, S. (1964). Protectionism and industrialization in Latin America. Economic Bulletin for Latin America, 9, 61–101.
  • Macedo, J. (2010). Methodology adaptation across levels of development: Applying a US regional housing model to Brazil. Housing Studies, 25(5), 607–624.
  • Malpass, P. (2011). Path dependence and the measurement of change in housing policy. Housing Theory and Society, 28(4), 305–319.
  • McKenzie, D., & Mookherjee, D. (2003). The distributive impact of privatisation in Latin America: Evidence from four countries. Economía, 3(2), 161–233.
  • Melo, M. (May 1992). Policymaking, political regimes and business interests: The rise and demise of the Brazilian housing finance system, center for international studies working paper 2597/C92/4. Massachusetts: MIT.
  • Ministerio De Vivienda y Urbanismo (MINVU). (2004). Chile: Un Siglo de Políticas de Vivieda y Barrio [A Century of Hosuing Policies]. Santiago: Author.
  • Morais, L., Saad Filho, A., & Coelho, W. (1999). Financial liberalisation, currency instability and crisis in Brazil: Another plan bites the dust. Capital & Class, 68, 9–14.
  • Murillo, F. (2001). Private-public partnership, the compact city, and social housing: Best practice for whom? Development in Practice, 11(2–3), 336–343.
  • Ocampo R. (2004). Contribuciones INVI al debate TeNVI a y Pr Pr al Sobre el Proceso Habitacional [Contributions to the Housing Process Debate]. Revista INVI, 52(19), 19–59.
  • Parris T., & Kates, R. (2003). Characterising and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–586.
  • Pugh, C. (2001). The theory and practice of housing sector development for developing countries, 1950–1999. Housing Studies, 16(4), 399–423.
  • Rodriguez-Acosta, C., & Rosenbaum, A. (2005). Local government and the governance of metropolitan areas in Latin America. Public Administration and Development, 25, 295–306.
  • Rojas, E. (2000). The long road to housing sector reform: Lessons from the Chilean housing experience. Housing Studies, 16(4), 461–483.
  • Ronald, R. (2007). Comparing home-owner societies: Can we construct an East-west model. Housing Studies, 22(4), 473–493.
  • Sabattini, F., Cáceres, G., & Cerda, A. (2001). Segregación residentcial en las principles Ciudades Chilenas: Tendencies de las Tres Últimas Décadas y Posibles Cursos de Acción. Eure, 26(79), 21–42.
  • Sacks, J. (2006). The challenge of sustainable development in Latin America. Lecture series of the Americas, transcript: Organisation of American States, Washington, DC; March 14.
  • Salcedo, R. (2010). The last slum: Moving from illegal settlements to subsidised home ownership in Chile. Urban Affairs, 46, 90–118.
  • Salcedo, R., & Torres, A. (2004). Gated communities in Santiago: Wall or frontier? International Journal of Regional Research, 28(1), 27–44.
  • Samuelson, R. (2001). The spirit of capitalism. Foreign Affairs, 80(1), 205–211.
  • Scheinsohn, M., & Cabrera, C. (2009). Social movements and the production of housing in Buenos Aires; When policies are effective. Environment and Urbanisation, 21, 109–125.
  • Silva Lerda, S. (1997). Estudio Análisis de la Evolución de la Política Habitacional Chilena. Santiago: MINVU.
  • Soto, R., & Torche, A. (2004). Spatial inequality, migration and economic growth in Chile. Cuadernos de Economía, 41(December), 401–424.
  • Speak, S. (2004). Degrees of destitution: A typology of homelessness in developing countries. Housing Studies, 19(3), 465–482.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalisation and its discontents. Great Britain: Penguin Books.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2007). Making globalisation work. Great Britain: Penguin Books.
  • Subsecretaría de Urbanismo y Vivienda (SUV). (2007). Lineamientos Estratégicos para la Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Dirección Provincial de Ordenamiento Urbano y Territorial.
  • Tachópulos Sierra, D. (2008). El Sitema Nacional de Vivienda de Interés Social (1990–2007) [National Housing Policy from 1990 to 2007]. In O. Ceballos Ramos (Ed.), Vivienda Social en Colombia: Una Mirada Desde su Legislación 1918-2005 (pp. 181–238). Bogota: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  • Texeira de Melo, E. (2014). FGTS Ação para Alteração do Índice de Correção dos Depósitos [Savings Index: Action for its Change]. Ferreira & Mello Bulletin (January) Retrieved May 28, 2014 from http://www.ferreiraemelo.com.br/midias/fgts_pdf.pdf
  • Thibert, J., & Osorio, G.A. (2014). Urban segregation and metropolitics in Latin America: The case of Bogota, Colombia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1319–1343.
  • Thuillier, G. (2005). Gated communities in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina: A challenge for town planning. Housing Studies, 20(2), 255–271.
  • Turner, J. (1977). Housing by people: Toward autonomy in building environments. London: Pantheon Books.
  • Valenca, M. (1992). The inevitable crisis of the Brazilian housing finance system. Urban Studies, 29, 39–56.
  • Valenca, M.M., & Bonantes, M.F. (2010). The trajectory of social housing policy in Brazil: From the National Housing Bank to the Ministry of the Cities. Habitat International, 34(2), 165–173.
  • Valladares, L.P. (1978). Working the System: Squatter response to resettlement in Rio. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 12(1), 12esrn.
  • Van Gelder, J.L. (2009). Legal tenure security, perceived tenure and housing improvement in Buenos Aires: An attempt towards integration. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 126–146.
  • Varley, A. (1987). The relationship between tenure legalisation and housing improvements: Evidence from Mexico city. Development and Change, 18, 463–481.
  • Varley, A. (2002). Private or public: Debating the meaning of tenure legalisation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 449urnal.
  • Werlin, H. (1999). The slum upgrading myth. Urban Studies, 36(9), 1523yth, h.
  • World Bank. (1993). Housing: Enabling markets to work. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • World Bank. (1994). Vivienda un Entorno Propicio para el Mercado Habitacional [A Suitable Environment for the Housing Market]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • World Bank. (2015). Left behind: Chronic poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Zanetta, C. (2005). Seeking better policies or just giving up responsibility? The decentralization of Argentinaas or just giving up responsibility. Third Urban Research Symposium. Retrieved July 28, 2014 from http://www.pragueinstitute.org/GUDMag07Vol3Iss1/Zanetta%20PDF.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.