Horizontally organised and innovative spaces of dialogue for dealing with ‘wicked problems’ related to housing in rural Sweden

References

• Amcoff, J., & Westholm, E. (2007). Understanding rural change: Demography as a key to the future. Futures, 39, 363–379. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.S., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Bartels, W.-L. (2012). Power and conflict in adaptive management: Analyzing the discourse of riparian management on public lands. Ecology and Society, 17, article 19. doi:10.5751/ES-04636-170119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M. (2007). Formality and friendship: Research ethics review and participatory action research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 411–421. Retrieved from http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/article/view/789/648
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., & Watkins, D. (2009). Affordability and supply: The rural dimension. Planning Practice and Research, 24, 185–210. doi:10.1080/02697450902827352
   Google Scholar
• Bramwell, B., & Sharman, A. (1999). Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 392–415. doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00105-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, C., Sultana, F., & Pain, R. (2007). Participatory ethics: Politics, practices, institutions. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 304–318. Retrieved from http://content.lib.utah.edu/utils/getfile/collection/uspace/id/322/filename/471.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cannarella, C., & Piccioni, V. (2007). Innovation diffusion and territorial inertia. International Journal of Rural Management, 3, 181–211. doi:10.1177/097300520800300201
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C.W. (1967). Wicked problems. Guest Editorial, Management Science, 14, 141–142. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2628678
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., Richardson, T., & Miles, T. (2006). Situated legitimacy: Deliberative arenas and the new rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 267–277. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Eriksson, A. (2011). White spaces innovation in Sweden - Innovation policy for exploring the adjacent possible. Vinnova Report VR, 10. VINNOVA –Verket för Innovationssystem/Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation System. Retrieved from http://www.vinnova.se/en/Publications-and-events/Publications/Products/White-Spaces-Innovation-in-Sweden/
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing, and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malmö/Copenhagen: Liber/CBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (Department for Communities and Local Government). (2009). The government response to the Taylor review of rural economy and affordable housing. London: DCLG. Retrieved from http://www.liveworknet.com/uploads/Taylor%20Review%20Response.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dorado, S., & Ventresca, M.J. (2013). Crescive entrepreneurship in complex social problems: Institutional conditions for entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 69–82. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDORA. (2013). European development opportunities for rural areas. Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/EDORA/EDORA_Draft_Final_Report_Version_2.4_April_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006a). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 323–341. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006b). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58, 197–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. (2010). Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion5/pdf/5cr_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., & Robinson, S. (2011). Local perspectives on rural housing affordability and implications for the localism agenda in England. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 297–307. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., Shucksmith, M., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (Eds.). (2012). Housing in the European countryside: Rural pressure and policy in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gawell, M., Johannisson, B., & Lundqvist, M. (2009). Samhällets entreprenörer. In M. Gawell, B. Johannisson, & M. Lundqvist, (Eds.), En forskarantologi om samhällsentreprenörskap [Entrepreneurs of society. In a research anthology about social entrepreneurship]. Stockholm: KK-Foundation. Retrieved from http://kks.se/om/Lists/Publikationer/DispForm.aspx?IDD150&ContentTypeIdD0£0100BB74D3FA1942FF47BEF16DB36967F4BC
   Google Scholar
• Gell-Mann, M. (1995). Let´s call it plectics. Complexity, 1, 3. Retrieved from http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/∼mgm/Site/Publications_files/MGM%20118.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122. doi:10.2307/2486994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Symposium: Governance networks. Performing governance through networks. European Political Science, 4, 340–347. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. (1996). Unravelling the process of partnership' in urban regeneration policy. Urban Studies, 33, 253–268. doi:10.1080/00420989650011997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, K., & Henderson, S. (2005). Excluding exceptions: Housing non-affordability and the oppression of environmental sustainability? Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 181–196. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. (2007). Positionalities and knowledge: Negotiating ethics in practice. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 386–394. Retrieved from http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/article/view/787
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2004). Building, dwelling, living. How animals and people make themselves home in the world. In N. Thrift & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Cultural geography. Critical concepts in the social sciences (pp. 57–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonasson, M. (2012) Innovation and learning in thin structures – producing intensive links in Halland. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 12, 364–378. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2012.049350
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17, 21–36. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2011.536344
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 34–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R.L. (2009). The design of business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86, 5–18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3554456
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2007). Partnership, collaborative planning and urban regeneration. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Moeliono, M., Gallemore, C., Santoso, L., Brockhaus, M., & Di Gregorio, M. (2014). Information networks and power: Confronting the “wicked problem” of REDD+ in Indonesia. Ecology and Society: A Journal of Integrative Science for Resilience and Sustainability, 19, article 9. doi.org/10.5751/ES-06300-190209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, M. (2003). Rural development: Principles and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Niedomysl, T., & Amcoff, J. (2011). Is there hidden potential for rural population growth in Sweden? Rural Sociology, 76, 257–279. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). Report on smart, green, clean, and inclusive recovery and development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/interimreportofthegreengrowthstrategyimplementingourcommitmentforasustainablefuture.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). Social cooperation in collective-action situations. In H.J. Rösner & F. Schulz-Nieswandt (Eds.), Neue Kölner Genossenschaftswissenschaft. Cologne: Work & Cooperative Sciences Institute, AGI Institute. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10535/7993
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2013). Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Management Review, 16, 1–19. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Weber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnerman, K., Tornberg, G., Axén, U., Bergström, K., Nyberg, E., & Söderström, Å. (2004). Aktionsforskning i praktiken: erfarenheter och reflektioner [Action research in practice: experiences and reflections]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Satsangi, M., Gallen, N., & Bevan, M. (2010). The rural housing question. Bristol: The Policy Press
   Google Scholar
• Shucksmith, M. (1990). A theoretical perspective on rural housing: Housing classes in rural Britain. Sociologia Ruralis, 30, 210–229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1990.tb00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P.M., & Scharmer, C.O. (2006). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. In P.M. Senge & C.O. Scharmer (Eds.),Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition (pp. 195–206). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sobels, J., Curtis, A., & Lockie, S. (2001). The role of Landcare group networks in rural Australia: Exploring the contribution of social capital. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 265–276. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2008). Living, working countryside: The Taylor review of rural economy and affordable housing. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. Retrieved from http://www.wensumalliance.org.uk/publications/Taylor_Review_Livingworkingcountryside.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tell, J., Lagerholm, B., & Florén, H. (2010). Drivkrafter för nya affärsmöjligheter genom industriöverskridande lärande [Incitements for new business possibilities through inter-industrial learning]. In B. Johannisson & D. Rylander (Eds.), Entreprenörskap i regioners tjänst – Ingångar till nya näringar genom design, upplevelser, kulturarv [Entrepreneurship in the service of regions – Entries towards new business through design, experience, cultural heritage] (pp. 37–60). Jönköping: EIDI.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2005). Geography and ethics: Moral geographies? Ethical commitment in research and teaching. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 483–487. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph561pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. (2009). Mapping knowledge controversies: Science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 587–598. doi:10.1177/0309132509339841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood, R. (2002). Paris, councils, partnership and governance: The development of ‘exceptions’ housing in the Malvern Hills District, England. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 275–291. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00042-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar