The Pyrrhic victory of civil society housing? Co-operative housing in Sweden and Norway

References

• Andersson, R., & Turner, L.M. (2014). Segregation, gentrification, and residualisation: From public housing to market driven housing allocation in inner city Stockholm. European Journal of Housing Policy, 14(1), 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Annaniassen, E. (1996). Nå bygger vi den nye tid. Boligsamvirkets historie i Norge [Building for new times. The history of the co-operative housing movement in Norway]. Oslo: Exil.
   Google Scholar
• Bay, A. (1985). Boligstatus og stemmegivning: Eller, boligpolitikkens betydning for høyrebølgen [Tenure and voting: The contribution of housing policy to the blue wave]. Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. (1992). Not the middle way but both ways – Cooperative housing in Sweden. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 9(Suppl. 2), 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. (1993). Prosperous ambivalence – Housing cooperatives in Sweden. Gävle: Statens institut för byggnadsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. (2001). Housing as a social right: Implications for welfare state theory. Scandinavian Political Studies, 24(4), 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. [2006] (2013). Sverige – kommunal allmännytta och korporativa särintressen [Sweden – Municipal housing and corporative special interests]. In B. Bengtsson (Ed.), Varför så olika? Nordisk bostadspolitik i jämförande historiskt ljus [Why so different? Nordic housing policies in comparative historical perspective]. Malmö: Égalite.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., & Ruonavaara, H. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Path dependence in housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(3), 193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., & Ruonavaara, H. (2011). Comparative process tracing in housing studies. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(4), 395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnsen, B., & Kronborg, A.K. (2009). Hele folket i hus. OBOS 1970-2009 [Housing all of the people. OBOS 1970–2009]. Oslo: OBOS/Gaidaros forlag.
   Google Scholar
• CECODHAS Housing Europe & ICA Housing. (2012). Profiles of a movement: Co-operative housing around the world. Brussels: CECODHAS Housing Europe; Ottawa: ICA Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, D. (2012). Cooperative housing/ownership. In S. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia of housing and home. Amsterdam: Focus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, D., & Kintrea, K. (1987). Importing housing policy: Housing co-operatives in Britain and Scandinavia. Housing Studies, 2(3), 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1998). A plea for mechanisms. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms. An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 45–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, P., Hendershott, P.H., & Turner, B. (1995). The tax reform and the housing market. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 2, 319–356.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2003). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 515–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. (1980). Fra marked til administrasjon? Boligmarked og boligpolitikk i Oslo i det tjuene århundret [From the market to administration? The housing market and housing policy in 20th century Oslo] (PhD thesis). Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L., & Torgersen, U. (1976). Eierfølelse, offentlig regulering og partivalg [Ownership, regulation and party choice]. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 17(1), 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, L. (1974). HSB under femtio år – en organisationsstudie [Fifty years of HSB – A study of an organization]. Stockholm: HSBs Riksförbund.
   Google Scholar
• Hultberg, R. (1986). Vänstern och vinsterna [The left and the profit motive]. Stockholm: Tiden.
   Google Scholar
• Hultberg, R. (2010). Ur mitt perspektiv. Två decennier med Riksbyggen [From my perspective. Two decades with Riksbyggen]. Stockholm: Riksbyggen.
   Google Scholar
• Jörnmark, J. (2005). Bostadsrätterna, allmännyttan och lagarna [Co-operative housing, municipal housing and the law]. In N. Berggren & N. Karlson (Eds.), Äganderättens konsekvenser och grunder [The consequences and causes of ownership]. Stockholm: Ratio.
   Google Scholar
• Karlberg, B., & Victorin, A. (2004). Housing tenures in the Nordic countries. In M. Lujanen (Ed.), Housing and housing policy in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (1978). Forms of tenure and social structure: A comparison of owning and renting in Australia and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 29(1), 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kili, T., & Skeie, J. (1998). Pionér i 50 år. USBL fra selvbygging til økologi [A pioneer is 50 years old. USBL from self-building to ecology]. Oslo: Boligbyggelaget USBL.
   Google Scholar
• Klassekampen. (2014). Norges nye boliggiant [Norway's new housing giant]. Retrieved from http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/norge/1.7323370
   Google Scholar
• Lundevall, O. (1995). HSB och bostadspolitiken 1950-1965 [HSB and housing policy 1950–1965]. Stockholm: HSBs Riksförbund.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L.J. (1988). Housing policy and tenure in Sweden: The quest for neutrality. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L.J. (1992). Tenure and property: The power dimension of welfare state involvement in Nordic housing. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 9(Suppl. 2), 121–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L.J., Elander, I., & Danermark, B. (1990). Housing policy in Sweden – Still a success story? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14(3), 445–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Statistics. (2011). Population and housing census.
   Google Scholar
• O'Hara, G. (2008). Applied socialism of a fairly moderate kind. Scandinavian Journal of History, 33(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.S. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramberg, K. (2000). Allmännyttan. Välfärdsbygge 1850-2000 [Municipal housing. Housing for welfare 1850--2000]. Stockholm: Byggförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B.L. (2008). Assessing variation in civil society organisations: China's homeowner associations in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(9), 1240–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. (1993). Forms and types of housing tenures. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 10(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. (2005). How divergent housing institutions evolve: A comparison of Swedish tenant-owner co-operatives and Finnish shareholders’ housing companies. Housing, Theory & Society, 22(4), 213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. [2006] (2013). Finland – den dualistiska bostadsregimen och jakten på det sociala [Finland – the dualist housing regime and the quest for the social dimension]. In B. Bengtsson (Ed.), Varför så olika? Nordisk bostadspolitik i jämförande historiskt ljus [Why so different? Nordic housing policies in comparative historical perspective]. Malmö: Égalite.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, H. (1991). State, market, and community: Housing co-operatives in theoretical perspective. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 6(3), 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P., & Bengtsson, B. (2002). Constructionism, realism and housing theory. Housing, Theory and Society, 19(3–4), 121–136.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. (2008). Fra totalreguleringsambisjoner til markedsstyring. Arbeiderpartiet og reguleringen av boligomsetningen 1970–1989 [From regulation to the market. Labour and the regulation of the housing market 1970–1989]. Oslo: NOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. (2011). Norsk boligpolitikk i forandring 1970–2010 [Norwegian housing policy transformed 1970–2010]. Oslo: NOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. (2014). The Politics of Cooperative Housing in Norway and Sweden 1960–1990 (1945–2013) – The Swedish deregulation of 1968 and the Norwegian Liberalisation of the 1980s (PhD dissertation). Faculty of the Humanities, University of Oslo. Retrieved from http://www.hioa.no/Mediabiblioteket/node_31750/node_42469/The-politics-of-Cooperative-Housing-in-Norway-and-Sweden-Jardar-Soervoll
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. (2015). Staten, kommunene, private og leiemarkedet: Et større og mer profesjonelt leiemarked i norske byer? [The state, the municipalities, the private sector and the rental market: A larger and more professional rental market in Norwegian cities?] Oslo: NOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament. (1958). Motion AK. 343/1958.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament. (1967). Motion FK. 71/1967.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, S.K.A. (1998). Transformation of a tenure: The evolution of tenant-ownership in Sweden. Gävle: Institutet för bostadsforskning, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranøy, B.S. (2000). Losing credit. The politics of liberalisation and macro-economic change in Norway 1980-92 (PhD dissertation). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. (1997). Housing cooperatives in Sweden: The effects of financial deregulation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 15(2), 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B., & Whitehead, C.M.E. (2002). Reducing housing subsidy: Swedish housing policy in an international context. Urban Studies, 39(2), 201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USK [Utrednings- och statistikkontoret]. (2005). Utvärdering av de kommunala bostadsbolagens försäljningar till bostadsrättsföreningar åren 1999–2004 [An evaluation of the municipal housing companies' sale of housing to co-operative housing associations 1999–2004]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Victorin, A. (1987). Forms of tenure in Sweden. The case of the tenant-owner. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 31, 203–237.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel, T. (1996). Eierleiligheter [Owner-occupied flats] (PhD dissertation). Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope, and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 32–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2008). A social democratic model of civil society. In B. Jobert & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds.), Changing images of civil society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar