AAI coherence predicts caregiving and care seeking behavior: Secure base script knowledge helps explain why

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. D. (1967). Infancy in Uganda. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1993). A psychometric study of the Adult Attachment Interview: Reliability and discriminant validity. Developmental Psychology, 29, 870–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169–183). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battaglia, D., Richard, F., Datteri, D., & Lord, C. (1998). Breaking up is (relatively) easy to do: A script for the dissolution of close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 829–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M. (2002). Handbook of parenting: Vol. 3, Being and becoming a parent. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bosmans, G., Braet, C., Koster, E., & De Raedt, R. (2009). Attachment security and attentional breadth toward the attachment figure in middle childhood. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 872–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmans, G., De Raedt, R., & Braet, C. (2007). The invisible bonds: Does the secure base script of attachment influence children’s attention toward their mother?. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol.1. Attachment). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2, Separation). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss (Vol. 3, Loss). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research: Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, I. (1987). New perspectives on attachment relations: Security, communication, andworking models. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development. (2nd ed.) (pp.1061–1100). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton. (1992). Attachment and bonding: From ethological to representational and societal perspectives. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Herson (Eds.), Handbook of social development (pp. 133–155). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, I., & Mulholland, K. A. (2008). Internal working models in attachment relationships: Elaborating a central construct in attachment theory. In J. A. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 102–127). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byng-Hall, J. (1998). Rewriting family scripts: Improvisation and systems change. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, J. (in press). The adult attachment interview. In E. Waters, B. Vaughn, & H. S. Waters (Eds.), Measuring attachment. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, J. A., & Feldman, S. S. (1988). Mothers’ internal models of relationships and children’s behavioral and developmental status: A study of mother-child interaction. Child Development, 59, 1273–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowell, J. A., & Treboux, D. (2001). Attachment security in adult partnerships. In C. Clulow (Ed.), Adult attachment and couple psychotherapy: The “Secure Base” in practice and research (pp. 28–42). London: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, J. A., Treboux, D., Gao, Y., Fyffe, C., Pan, H., & Waters, E. (2002). Secure base behavior in adulthood: Measurement, links to adult attachment representations, and relations to couples’ communication and self reports. Developmental Psychology, 38, 679–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowell, J., Pan, H., Gao, Y., Treboux, D., & Waters, E. (1998). Scoring adults’ secure base use and support: Overview of the Secure Base Scoring System (SBSS). Retrieved from http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/measures/content/sbss.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, B. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fivush, R. (2006). Scripting attachment: Generalized event representations and internal working models. Attachment & Human Development, 8, 283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, P. W., Jones, D., & Palmer, D. J. (1994). Social cognitive correlates of preschool children’s sibling caregiving behavior. Developmental Psychology, 30, 905–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Moran (Eds.), Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. E. (2000). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 71, 690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, E. (1999). The Adult Attachment Interview: Historical and current perspectives. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp.395–433). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, E. (2008). The adult attachment interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 552–558). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, E., & Main, M. (1999). Second-generation effects of unresolved trauma in nonmaltreating parents: Dissociated, frightened, and threatening parental behavior. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 481–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, E., & Main, M. (2000). Disorganized infant, child, and adult attachment: Collapse in behavioral and attentional strategies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 1097–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, R. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment, 13, 5–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinde, R. A. (1991). Continuities and discontinuities. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Studies of psychosocial risk: The power of longitudinal data (pp. 376–384). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. (1992). Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness And Cognition, 1, 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R., Zhang, S., Preacher, K., & Rucker, D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main, M. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) models of attachment: Some findings and some directions for future research. In P. Marris, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & C. Parkes, (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127–159). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M. (2000). The organized categories of infant, child, and adult attachment: Flexible vs. inflexible attention under attachment-related stress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 1055–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main, M., Goldwyn, R., & Hesse, E. (2003). The Adult Attachment Interview classification and scoring system (version 7.2). Unpublished Manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M., Hesse, E., & Goldwyn, R. (2008). Studying differences in language use in recounting attachment history: An introduction to the AAI. In H. Steele & M. Steele (Eds.), Clinical applications of the Adult Attachment Interview. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M., Hesse, E., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Predictability of attachment behavior and representational processes at 1, 6, and 19 years of age: The Berkeley Longitudinal Study. In K. E. Grossmann K. Grossmann, & E. Waters (Eds.), Attachment from infancy to adulthood: The major longitudinal studies (pp. 245–304). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points in attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1–2, Serial No. 209), 66–106.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mashek, D., & Aron, A. (2004). Handbook of closeness and intimacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge: Structures and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, G., Crowell, J. A., Pan, H., Treboux, D., O‘Connor, E., & Waters, E. (1995). The prototype hypothesis and the origins of attachment working models: Adult relationships with parents and romantic partners. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, 216–233.
   Google Scholar
• Posada, G., Waters, E., Moran, G., Pederson, D., & Vaughn, B. (in press). Mary Ainsworth, ethology, and maternal sensitivity. In E. Waters, B. Vaughn, & H. S. Waters (Eds.), Measuring attachment. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Frieze, I. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles’ scripts for a first date. Gender and Society, 3, 358–368.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R., & Abelson, A. (1977). Scripts plans goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sroufe, L., & Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 1184–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, H., & Steele, M. (Eds.) (2008). Clinical applications of the Adult Attachment Interview. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment. A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, E., & Cummings, E. (2000). A secure base from which to explore close relationships. Child Development, 71, 164–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000). Attachment stability in infancy and early adulthood: A 20-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71, 684–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, H., & Waters, E. (2006). The attachment working models concept: Among other things, we build script-like representations of secure base experiences. Attachment and Human Development, 8, 185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, H., & Waters, E. (in press). The attachment script assessment: Prompt-word outlines and script-like representations of early secure base experience. In E. Waters, B. Vaughn, & H. Waters (Eds.), Measuring attachment. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, T. E. A. (in press). Secure base content in the Adult Attachment Interview. In E. Waters, B. Vaughn, & H. S. Waters (Eds.), Measuring attachment. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. L., & Heyman, R. E. (1990). Observation of marital interaction. In F. D. Fincham & T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: Basic issues and applications (pp. 87–117). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. J., & Carlston, D. (1983). Consequences of schemata for attention, impressions, and recall in complex social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J., & Klosko, J. (2005). Schema therapy. In J. Oldham, A. Skodol, & D. Bender (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of personality disorders (pp. 289–306). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar