The co-optation of feminisms: a research agenda

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. 2002. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others.” American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–790. doi: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. E. 1998. “Latin American Feminisms ‘Go Global’: Trends of the 1990s and Challenges for the New Millennium.” In Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-Visioning Latin American Social Movements, edited by S. E. Alvarez, E. Dagnino, and A. Escobar, 293–324. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith, K. 1987. “Response to Feminism.” In the Italian Parliament.” In Women’s Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy, edited by M. Feinsod Katzenstein, and C. McClurg Mueller, 153–171. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, V., and I. Grewal. 2014. Theorizing NGOs: States, Feminisms, and Neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. 2010. “Militarized Humanitarianism Meets Carceral Feminism: The Politics of Sex, Rights, and Freedom in Contemporary Antitrafficking Campaigns.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36 (1): 45–71. doi: 10.1086/652918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandar, B., and D. Ferreira da Silva. 2013. “White Feminist Fatigue Syndrome. A Reply to Nancy Fraser.” Critical Legal Thinking, October 21. http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/10/21/white-feminist-fatigue-syndrome/.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, L. M. 2010. “Engaging with the State: Considering the ‘Progressive Potential’ of Feminist Service Provision.” Atlantis 34 (2): 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. C., and M. Bernstein. 2014. “How the Right Usurped the Queer Agenda: Frame Co-Optation in Political Discourse.” Sociological Forum 29 (4): 830–850. doi: 10.1111/socf.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkin, S. 2015. “Feminism, Interrupted? Gender and Development in the Era of ‘Smart Economics’.” Progress in Development Studies 15 (4): 295–307. doi: 10.1177/1464993415592737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 2011. “Construing Top-Down as Bottom-Up: The Governmental Co-Optation of Peacebuilding ‘From Below’.” Explorations in Anthropology 11 (1): 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Corntassel, J. 2007. “Towards a New Partnership? Indigenous Political Mobilization and Co-Optation During the First UN Indigenous Decade (1995-2004).” Human Rights Quarterly 29 (1): 137–166. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2007.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coslett, R. L. 2014. “Chanel: Co-Opting Feminism at Paris Fashion Week,” The Guardian, September 30. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/30/chanel-karl-lagerfeld-feminism-paris-fashion-week.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, P. G. 2013. “Co-Optation.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, and D. McAdam, 280–281. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, P. G., and T. Hedeen. 2005. “A Stage Model of Social Movement Co-Optation: Community Mediation in the United States.” The Sociological Quarterly 46 (3): 405–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P., and G. Lebaron. 2014. Protest Inc.: The Corporatization of Activism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, S. 2017. Complicit Sisters: Gender and Women’s Issues Across North-South Divides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, H. 1990. “Femocrats, Official Feminism and the Uses of Power.” In Playing the Slate. Australian Feminist Interventions, edited by S. Watson, 87–103. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, H. 2015. “The Sweatshop Feminists.” Jacobin Magazine, June 17. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/06/kristof-globalization-development-third-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Eschle, C., and B. Maiguashca. 2014. “Reclaiming Feminist Futures: Co-Opted and Progressive Politics in a Neo-Liberal Age.” Political Studies 62: 634–651. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. L. 2005. ““W” Stands for Women: Feminism and Security Rhetoric in the Post-9/11 Bush Administration.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 9–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. 1987. “Equality and Autonomy: Feminist Politics in the United States and West Germany.” In Women’s Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy, edited by M. Feinsod Katzenstein, and C. McClurg Mueller, 172–195. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., and B. B. Hess. 2000. Controversy and Coalition: The New Feminist Movement Across Four Decades of Change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flournoy, E. 2013. “No, It’s Not a Joke: The Christian Right’s Appropriation of Feminism.” Rethinking Marxism 25 (3): 350–366. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2013.798970
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2009. “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History.” New Left Review 56. http://newleftreview.org/II/56/nancy-fraser-feminism-capitalism-and-the-cunning-of-history.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2013a. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2013b. “How Feminism Became Capitalism’s Handmaiden – And How to Reclaim It.” The Guardian, October 14. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. 2006. “Movement Impact on Cultural Change.” In Culture, Power, and History: Studies in Critical Sociology, edited by S. Pfohl, A. van Wagenen, P. Arend, A. Brooks, and D. Leckenby, 103–125. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gouws, A. 1996. “The Rise of the Femocrat?” Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity 12 (30): 31–43. doi: 10.2307/4065780
   Google Scholar
• Halley, J. 2006. Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. 2011. Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinterhuber, E. M., and S. Möller. 2013. “Kopiert, kommerzialisiert, kooptiert: Die Aneignung von Partizipationsformen jenseits der Konventionen durch Wirtschaftsakteure.” In Politische Partizipation jenseits der Konventionen, edited by D. de Nève, and T. Olteanu, 205–230. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, J. 2008. “Is Global Governance Bad for East Asian Queers?” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 14 (4): 457–479. doi: 10.1215/10642684-2008-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 1992. “Eating the Other.” In Black Looks: Race and Representation, 21–39. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. 2002. “The Strategic Co-Optation of Women’s Rights.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 4 (1): 116–121. doi: 10.1080/14616740110108749
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D. 2012. “Weak Coffee: Certification and Co-Optation in the Fair Trade Movement.” Social Problems 59 (1): 94–116. doi: 10.1525/sp.2012.59.1.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., and J. Squires. 2012. “From State Feminism to Market Feminism.” International Political Science Review 33 (4): 382–400. doi: 10.1177/0192512111432513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karliner, J. 2001. “A Brief History of Greenwash.” CorpWatch, March 22. http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=243.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, C., C. Rasmussen, and P. Rishi. 2010. “The Rationality of Empowerment: Microcredit, Accumulation by Dispossession, and the Gendered Economy.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36 (1): 153–176. doi: 10.1086/652911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. A. 1999. “The Co-Optation of a "Revolution": Rastafari, Reggae, and the Rhetoric of Social Control.” Howard Journal of Communications 10 (2): 77–95. doi: 10.1080/106461799246834
   Google Scholar
• Lal, P. 2013. “How Pinkwashing Masks the Retrograde Effects of Immigration Reform.” Huffington Post, April 15. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/prerna-lal/pinkwashing-immigration-reform_b_3070788.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S. 1997. “The NGOization of Feminism: Institutionalization and Institution Building Within the German Women’s Movements.” In Transitions, Environments, Translations; Feminism in International Politics, edited by C. Kaplan, J. W. Scott, and D. Keates, 101–120. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lapegna, P. 2014. “Pitfalls of Co-Optation.” Participation and its Discontents, February 18. http://participationanditsdiscontents.tumblr.com/post/77071378901/pitfalls-of-cooptation.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, E., and P. Meier. 2006. “Gender Mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a Feminist Reading?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (2): 151–166. doi: 10.1177/1350506806062753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhok, S., and S. M. Rai. 2012. “Agency, Injury, and Transgressive Politics in Neoliberal Times.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37 (2): 645–669. doi: 10.1086/662939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride Stetson, D., and A. Mazur. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2004. “Post-Feminism and Popular Culture.” Feminist Media Studies 4 (3): 255–264. doi: 10.1080/1468077042000309937
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, N. 2004. Recovering Subversion: Feminist Politics Beyond the Law. Urbana: Permanent Black/University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., and S. Razavi. 1998. Missionaries and Mandarins: Feminist Engagement with Development Institutions. London: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Najam, A. 2000. “The Four C’s of Government Third Sector-Government Relations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10 (4): 375–396. doi: 10.1002/nml.10403
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N. A. 2013. ““It’s Not Fair!”.” Gender and Society 27 (2): 133–157. doi: 10.1177/0891243212472390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivius, E. 2014. Governing Refugees Through Gender Equality: Care, Control, Emancipation. Report: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Orloff, A., and T. Schiff. 2015. “Feminists in Power: Rethinking Gender Equality After the Second Wave.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by R. Kosslyn, and R. Scott, 1–15. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Prügl, E. 2011. “Diversity Management and Gender Mainstreaming as Technologies of Government.” Politics and Gender 7 (1): 71–89. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X10000565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prügl, E. 2015. “Neoliberalising Feminism.” New Political Economy 20 (4): 614–631. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.951614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. 2010. “Israel’s Gay Propaganda War.” The Guardian, July 1. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/jul/01/israels-gay-propaganda-war.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 1998. “Becoming Multilingual: The Challenges of Feminist Policy Advocacy.” In Missionaries and Mandarins: Feminist Engagement with Development Institutions, edited by C. Miller, and S. Razavi, 20–41. London: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, A. 2012. “Feminist Knowledge and Emerging Governmentality in UN Peacekeeping.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (3): 348–369. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2012.659853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. 2015. “The Political Economy of “Transnational Business Feminism”.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 17 (2): 209–231. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2013.849968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. 2015. “The Indian Women’s Movement: Within and Beyond NGOization.” Journal of South Asian Development 10 (1): 96–117. doi: 10.1177/0973174114567368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawer, M. 1998. “Femocrats and Ecorats: Women’s Policy Machinery in Australia, Canada and New Zealand.” In Missionaries and Mandarins: Feminist Engagement with Development Institutions, edited by C. Miller, and S. Razavi, 112–137. London: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Schild, V. 2015. “Feminism and Neoliberalism in Latin America.” New Left Review 96: 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, S. 2011. “Israel and ‘Pinkwashing’.” The New York Times, November 22. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/opinion/pinkwashing-and-israels-use-of-gays-as-a-messaging-tool.html?_r=1.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots; A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2006. “Without Bureaucracy, Beyond Inclusion: Re-centering Feminism,” Left Turn, June 1. http://www.leftturn.org/without-bureaucracy-beyond-inclusion-re-centering-feminism.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., E. B. Rochford Jr., S. K. Worden, and R. D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–481. doi: 10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratigaki, M. 2004. “The Cooptation of Gender Concepts in EU Policies: The Case of ‘Reconciliation of Work and Family’.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 11 (1): 30–56. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxh025
   Google Scholar
• Swan, E., and S. Fox. 2010. “Playing the Game: Strategies of Resistance and Co-Optation in Diversity Work.” Gender, Work, and Organization 17 (5): 567–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J. 2003. “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 5 (3): 368–396. doi: 10.1080/1461674032000122740
   Google Scholar
• Trumpy, A. J. 2008. “Subject to Negotiation: The Mechanisms Behind Co-Optation and Corporate Reform.” Social Problems 55 (4): 480–500. doi: 10.1525/sp.2008.55.4.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2004. “The Co-Optation of Squatters in Amsterdam and the Emergence of a Movement Meritocracy: A Critical Reply to Pruijt.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (3): 687–698. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. 1996. “The Colonizer/Colonized Chicana Ethnographer: Identity, Marginalization, and Co-Optation in the Field.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (4): 711–732. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.4.3483672630865482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von der Lippe, B., and T. Väyrynen. 2011. “Co-Opting Feminist Voices for the War on Terror: Laura Bush Meets Nordic Feminism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 18 (1): 19–33. doi: 10.1177/1350506810386082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. 2008. Respectably Queer: Diversity Culture in LGBT Activist Organisations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. 1992. “The Postmodern Crisis of the Black Intellectuals.” In Cultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, 689–705. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar