The midwife case and conscientious objection: new ways of framing abortion in Sweden

References

• Aarter, D. 2008. “The EU Referendum in Finland on 16 October 1994: A Vote for the West, Not for Maastricht.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (3): 361–387.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. 2009. ”Nordic Nostalgia and Nordic Light: The Swedish Model as Utopia 1930–2007.” Scandinavian Journal of History 34 (3): 229–245. doi: 10.1080/03468750903134699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B. 2004. “The Global–Local Nexus: NGOs and the Articulation of Scale.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95 (5): 498–510. doi: 10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannerji, H. 2000. The Dark Side of the Nation: Essays on Multiculturalism, Nationalism and Gender. Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlet, C. 2011. “Taking Tea Parties Seriously: Corporate Globalization, Populism, and Resentment.” Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 10 (1): 11–29. doi: 10.1163/156914911X555071
   Google Scholar
• Boréus, K. 1994. Högervåg: Nyliberalismen och kampen om språket i svensk debatt 1969–1989. Stockholm: Tiden.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström, L. 2017. “Juridik som politik och behovet av kritik.” In Rätten till rättvisa: Om utsatta människors rättigheter och tillgång till rättvisa, edited by P. Hall and L. Pelling, 60–75. Stockholm: Premiss.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S. 2007. “Branding Nordicity: Models, Identity and the Decline of Exceptionalism.” Cooperation and Conflict 42 (1): 27–51. doi: 10.1177/0010836707073475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case T-561/14. 2018. General Court of the European Union Press Release No 52/18, European Citizens' Initiative One of Us and Others v Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Czerwinski, A. 2003. “Sex, Politics, and Religion: The Clash between Poland and the European Union over Abortion.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 32: 653–674.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, A. 2006. “Sweden: Once a Moral Superpower, Always a Moral Superpower?” International Journal 61 (4): 895–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. v Ireland. 2002. Council of Europe. European Court of Human Rights Application no. 39474/98.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, K. 2005. “From the Common Market to the Political Union: The Shifting Opportunity Structure of Contentious Politics in Europe.” In Economic and Political Contention in Comparative Perspective, edited by M. Kousis and C. Tilly, 99–114. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eduards, M. 2009. Kroppspolitik: Om Moder Svea och andra kvinnor. Stockholm: Atlas Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (2): 304–344. doi: 10.1086/378343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., W. A. Gamson, D. Rucht, and J. Gerhards. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, R. Å. 2000. Välfärdstjänstearbetet: Dragkampen mellan offentligt och privat i ett historie-sociologiskt perspektiv. Gothenburg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskyns, C. 1996. Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• King, L., and G. Husting. 2003. “Anti-Abortion Activism in the US and France: Comparing Opportunity Environments of Rescue Tactics.” Mobilization 8 (3): 297–312. doi: 10.17813/maiq.8.3.h735767404671g50
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., and S. Olzack. 2002. “Right-Wing Violence and the Public Sphere in Germany: The Dynamics of Discursive Opportunities.” Paper presented at Stanford, July 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowska, I., D. Béland, and A. Lecours. 2016. “Nationalism, Religion, and Abortion Policy in Four Catholic Societies.” Nations and Nationalism 22 (4): 824–844. doi: 10.1111/nana.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumlin, S. 1997. “Folket och högervågen.” Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 100 (4): 411–440.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, P. 1997. “Scandinavian Exceptionalism and European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 35 (4): 565–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, A. 2004. “Victory and Beyond: A Historical Comparative Analysis of the Outcomes of the Abortion Movements in Sweden and the United States.” Sociological Forum 19 (3): 371–404. doi: 10.1023/B:SOFO.0000042554.66359.1d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker, K. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen, A. M., and A. Banasiak. 2013. “Juridification: Disrupting the Relationship between Law and Politics?” European Law Journal 19 (3): 325–339. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., and D. McAdam. 1996. “Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union.” West European Politics 19 (2): 249–278. doi: 10.1080/01402389608425133
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., F. Nielsen, L. Ray, and J. Salk. 1996. “Competencies, Cracks and Conflicts: Regional Mobilization in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 164–192. doi: 10.1177/0010414096029002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, M. 2017. Law and Social Movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal, J. 2018. “Reproductive Governance and the (Re)Definition of Human Rights in Poland.” Medical Anthropology 23 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Lawless, J. 1993. “Fertility, Bodies and Politics: The Irish Case.” Reproductive Health Matters 1 (2): 53–64. doi: 10.1016/0968-8080(93)90007-G
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. 2011. “Pro-Life, Pro-Woman? Frame Extension in the American Antiabortion Movement.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (1): 1–27. doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2011.537565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and R. D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participation Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1: 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. 1999. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 736–780. doi: 10.1086/210359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. C., and A. Hollis-Brusky. 2014. “Lawyers for God and Neighbor: The Emergence of ‘Law as a Calling’ as a Mobilizing Frame for Christian Lawyers.” Law & Social Inquiry 39 (2): 416–448. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 1996. “Women and the Biological Reproduction of ‘the Nation’.” Women’s Studies International Forum 19 (1–2): 17–24. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(95)00075-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar