Friends don't let friends cite the malestream: a case for strategic silence in feminist international relations

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, Jeff. 2017. “Gender Bias in International Relations Graduate Education? New Evidence from Syllabi.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 456–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingli, Sophia. 2015. “We Need to Talk about Silence: Re-examining Silence in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (4): 721–742. doi: 10.1177/1354066114568033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, Daniel W. 2010. “Can I Interest You in an International Studies Encyclopedia?” Foreign Policy. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/03/08/can-i-interest-you-in-an-international-studies-encyclopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Duriesmith, David. 2019. “Negative Space and the Feminist Act of Citation: Strategic Silence and the Limits of Gendering an Unloving Discipline.” In Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains: Beyond the Binary, edited by Jane L. Parpart and Swati Parashar, 66–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, Jamie J. 2016. “Queering Women, Peace and Security.” International Affairs 92 (2): 313–332. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, bell. 1991. “Theory as Liberatory Practice.” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 4 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Valerie M., Mary Caprioli, Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Rose McDermott, and Chad F. Emmett. 2009. “The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States.” International Security 33 (3): 7–45. doi: 10.1162/isec.2009.33.3.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1989. “International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 18 (2): 245–253. doi: 10.1177/03058298890180021001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliniak, Daniel, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney. 2018. “Is International Relations a Global Discipline? Hegemony, Insularity, and Diversity in the Field.” Security Studies 27 (3): 448–484. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2017.1416824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestreich, Joel E. 2007. “Teaching Gender and International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (3): 326–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00296.x
   Google Scholar
• Parashar, Swati. 2014. Women and Militant Wars: The Politics of Injury. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parpart, Jane L., and Swati Parashar, eds. 2019. Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains: Beyond the Binary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. Spike 1992. “Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21 (2): 183–206. doi: 10.1177/03058298920210020401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phull, Kiran, Gokhan Ciflikli, and Gustav Meibauer. 2019. “Gender and Bias in the International Relations Curriculum: Insights from Reading Lists.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (2): 383–407. doi: 10.1177/1354066118791690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Laura J. 2018. “Do the Work: A Thread, with Gifs.” Twitter, February 2. Accessed August 30, 2019. https://twitter.com/drljshepherd/status/959192978425233408.
   Google Scholar
• Soreanu, Raluca, and David Hudson. 2008. “Feminist Scholarship in International Relations and the Politics of Disciplinary Emotion.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37 (1): 123–151. doi: 10.1177/0305829808093768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, Judith, and Jutta Weldes. 2007. “Beyond Being Marginal: Gender and International Relations in Britain.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (2): 185–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00289.x
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, Christine. 2010. “Tensions in Feminist Security Studies.” Security Dialogue 41 (6): 607–614. doi: 10.1177/0967010610388206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, Christine. 2013. War as Experience: Contributions from International Relations and Feminist Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. Ann. 1997. “You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611–632. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.00060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. Ann. 2010. “You May Never Understand: Prospects for Feminist Futures in International Relations.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 32 (1): 9–20. doi: 10.1080/13200968.2010.10854434
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Cynthia. 1994. “Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (2): 337–349. doi: 10.1177/03058298940230021401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Cynthia. 2016. Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wibben, Annick T. R. 2010. Feminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Lauren B. 2015. Bodies of Violence: Theorizing Embodied Subjects in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, Gillian. 2004. “Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World ‘We’ Live In.” International Affairs 80 (1): 75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar