Sovereignty and Human Rights: A Comparison Between Western Liberal and Chinese Marxist Traditions

References

• Adorno, Theodor W. Jargon der Eigentlich: Zur Deutschen Ideologie. In Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 6. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, Andrés Beltramo. “Chinos, quienes mejor realizan la doctrina social de la Iglesia.” Vatican Insider, February 2, 2018. Available at http://www.lastampa.it/2018/02/02/vaticaninsider/es/vaticano/chinos-quienes-mejor-realizan-la-doctrina-social-de-la-iglesia-mBmGrdwCpUt2VVswtlkeuN/pagina.html.
   Google Scholar
• Angle, Stephen. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. Osaka: Asia-Pacific Human Rights Center, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Daniel. East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Daniel. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, Sarah. The Stability Imperative: Human Rights and Law in China. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, Jean. Les six Livres de la République. Paris: Librairie générale française, 1993. Originally published in 1576.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, Roland. Red Theology: On the Christian Communist Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, Roland. Socialism with Chinese Characteristics – A Guide for Foreigners. Singapore: Springer, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, Roland, and Christina Petterson. Idols of Nations: Biblical Myth at the Origins of Capitalism. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2006. Originally published in 1559.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Xiaoping. “Zhongguo ben shiji de mubiao shi shixian xiaokang (1979.12.06) [China’s Goal Is to Achieve Xiaokang by the End of the Century].” Deng Xiaoping wenxuan, Vol. 2, 237–38. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Xiaoping. “Zhongguo yongyuan bu yunxu bieguo ganshe neizheng (1990.07.11) [China Will Never Allow Other Countries to Interfere in Its Internal Affairs].” Deng Xiaoping Wenxuan 3: 359–360. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 20008.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, Friedrich. In “Dell’ Autorità [On Authority].” In Marx Engels Gesamtausgabe, Vol. I.24, 82–86. Berlin: Dietz, 1984. Originally published in 1873.
   Google Scholar
• Faggioli, Massimo. “China-Vatican Talks Uphold Historical Legacy.” Global Times, February 21, 2018. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1090048.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Ning. China’s Democratic Path. Translated by Wu Yisheng and Liu Aiyun. Singapore: Springer, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, Rosemary. Rights Beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle Over Human Rights in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Duncan, and Gustaaf Geeraerts. “Europe, China and Expectations for Human Rights.” In Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships, edited by Pan Zhongqi, 98–112. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gianaris, Nicholas. Modern Capitalism: Privatization, Employee Ownership, and Industrial Democracy. Westport: Greenwood Publishing, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gottwald, Joern-Carsten, and Niall Duggan. “Diversity, Pragmatism and Convergence: China, the European Union and the Issue of Sovereignty.” In Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships, edited by Pan Zhongqi, 35–49. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, Dieter. Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept. Translated by Belinda Cooper. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. Translated by John Clarke. Edited by Richard Tuck. 3 Vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005. Originally published in 1625.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Wei, and Zhao Shifa. “Xinshidai Zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi renquan guan jiqi shijian [The Practice of Human Rights from the Perspective of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era].” Lilun Shiye 7 (2018): 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Haldén, Peter. Sovereignty Without Statehood: Lessons from Europe’s History Before the Sovereign State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. Berliner Schriften 1818-1831. In Werke. Vol. 11. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994. Originally published in 1651.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Huiqin. “On the Power of Ideological Discourse.” Marxist Studies in China (2014): 118–135.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Nansen. “Shehuizhuyi shichang jingji lilun de zhexue jichu [The Philosophical Foundations of the Theory of the Socialist Market Economy].” Makesizhuyi yu Xianshi 11 (1994): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Robert. Sovereignty: Evolution of an Idea. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Kai. “Makesizhuyi renquan guan de zhongguohua yu dangdai jiangou [The Sinicization and Contemporary Construction of the Marxist View of Human Rights].” Xibu xuekan 11 (2018): 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Zemin. “Zhengque chuli shehuizhuyi xiandaihua jianshe zhong de ruogan zhongda guanxi (1995.09.28) [Correctly Handle Certain Major Relationships in the Socialist Modernization Drive].” Jiang Zemin Wenxuan 1: 460–475. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jouvenal, Bertrand de. Sovereignty: An Inquiry Into the Political Good. Translated by J. F. Huntingdon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmo, Hent, and Quentin Skinner. Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, John. “Natural Rights.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, edited by Henrik Lagerlund, 867–873. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Long. “Goujian renlei mingyun gongtongti shi shijie renquan shiye de weida chuangju [Building a Community of Common Destiny for Humankind is a Great Initiative in the Global Cause of Human Rights].” Wuhan keji daxue xuebao (shehui kexue ban) 20, no. 1 (2018): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Buyun, and Wang Xuejing. “Renquan guoji baohu yu guojia zhuquan [The International Protection of Human Rights and National Sovereignty].” Faxue Yanjiu 4 (1995): 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Buyun, Chen Youwu, Yang Songcai, Liu Zhiqiang, and Yuan Bingxi. “Zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi renquan lilun tixi lun gang [An Outline of the Theoretical System of Socialist Human Rights with Chinese Characteristics].” Faxue Yanjiu 2 (2015): 56–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Yuchuan. “Pubian renquan de jiegou yu Zhongguo renquan moshi de jiazhi – jiyu makesizhuyi renquan lilun zhongguohua de fenxi [A Deconstruction of Universal Human Rights and the Value of the Chinese Model of Human Rights – Based on the Analysis of the Sinicization of the Marxist Theory of Human Rights].” Jiangsu shehui kexue zhexue yanjiu 2 (2013): 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Losurdo, Domenico. Hegel and the Freedom of the Moderns. Translated by Marella Morris and Jon Morris. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Losurdo, Domenico. Liberalism: A Counter-History. Translated by Gregory Elliott. London: Verso, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, Martin. “Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed.” Luther’s Works 45 (1962): 81–129. Minneapolis: Fortress, Originally Published in 1523.
   Google Scholar
• Maritain, Jacques. Man and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. “Kritik des Gothaer Programms.” Marx Engels Gesamtausgabe I.25: 3–25. Berlin: Dietz, 1985. Originally written in 1875.
   Google Scholar
• Miéville, China. Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law. London: Pluto Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, Carmen. Divided Sovereignty: International Institutions and the Limits of State Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, Daniel. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Pope Francis. “Pope Francis: ‘Trump? I do not judge. I care only if he makes the poor suffer.’” Interviewed by Eugenio Scalfari. Translated by Kathryn Wallace. La Repubblica, November 11, 2016. https://www.repubblica.it/vaticano/2016/11/11/news/pope_francis_trump-151810120/.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Originally published in 1922.
   Google Scholar
• Sima, Qian. Shiji. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Pinghua. Human Rights Protection System in China. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Xiangchen. “Shuangchong benti: xingsu xiandai Zhongguo jiazhi xingtai de jichu [Dual Ontologies: The Foundation for Shaping the Form of Values of Modern China].” Xueshu Yuekan 6 (2015): 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Xiangchen, and Lu Xinyu. “Xiandaixing bushi minmie zishen de chuantong – Sun Xiangchen jiaoshou fangtan [Modernity Does Not Require Us to Relinquish Our Own Tradition – An Interview with Professor Sun Xiangchen].” Xueshu Yuekan 4 (2017): 178–184.
   Google Scholar
• Teschke, Benno. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Feilong, and Xue Haoyuan. “Xianggang guo’an fa yu ‘yiguo liangzhi’ de fazhi gonggu [The Hong Kong National Security Law and the Rule of Law Consolidation of ‘One Country, Two Systems’].” Qingnian Tansuo 5 (2020): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, Brian. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150-1625. Atlanta: Scholar’s Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Resolution 1514. New York: United Nations, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Resolution 2200A (XXI). New York: Office of the United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Resolution 543. New York: Office of the United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. Declaration on the Right to Development. A/RES/41/128. New York: Office of the United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Vasak, Karel. “Human Rights: A Thirty-Year Struggle: The Sustained Efforts to Give Force of Law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” UNESCO Courier 30, no. 11 (1977): 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Qianhui. “Zhongguo tese renquan guan de lishi fazhan yu neizai luoji [The Historical Development and Internal Logic of the View of Human Rights with Chinese Characteristics].” Renquan 5 (2017): 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Xigen, and Cui Yang. “Gaige kaifang 40 nian zhongguo renquan lilun yu shijian de chuangxin fazhan [The Innovative Development of China’s Human Rights Theory and Practice in the Past 40 Years of the Reform and Opening-Up].” Faxue Zazhi 1 (2019): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherley, Robert. The Discourse of Human Rights in China: Historical and Ideological Perspectives. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Hans Julius. Roman Law: An Historical Introduction. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Fan. “Lun xinshidai Zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi renquan sixiang chuangxin [On the Innovation of the Theory of Socialist Human Rights with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era].” Lilun yuekan 12 (2018): 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, Jinping. Juesheng quanmian jiancheng xiaokang shehui, duoqu xinshidai Zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi weida shengli (2017.10.18) [Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era]. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Weimin. “Zhongguo tese zhengdang zhidu de youshi ji dui shijie gongxian – ‘wei renlei dui genghao shehui zhidu de tansuo tigong Zhongguo fang’an’ zhi guanjian [The Advantages of the Political Party System with Chinese Characteristics and Its Global Contribution – A View on ‘Offering a Chinese Proposal for Humanity to Explore a Better Social System’].” Tongyi zhanxian xue yanjiu 1 (2017): 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Enlai. “Heping gongchu wu xiang yuanze (1953.12.31) [Five Principles for Peaceful Coexistence].” Zhou Enlai wenji 2: 113. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Yufu. “Zhongguo fuchi renkou jiao shao minzu de chengjiu, jingyan ji duice [Achievements, Experience, and Countermeasures Involved in Supporting Minority Nationalities in China].” Heilongjiang minzu congkan 5 (2012): 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Tom. “The Contribution of China to the Development of International Human Rights During the Past Seventy Years.” The Journal of Human Rights 19, no. 1 (2020): 116–125.
   Google Scholar