Promoting teachers’ agency: reflective practice as transformative disposition

References

• Bakhurst, D., Mikhailov, F. T., Bibler, S., Lektorsky, V. A., & Davydov, V. V. (1995). Social being and the human essence: An unresolved issue in Soviet philosophy conducted by David Backhurst. Studies in East European Thought, 47(1-2), 3–60.10.1007/BF01075140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? On judgement, wisdom and virtuosity in teaching and teacher education. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on teacher education (pp. 1–22). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118977859.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Bowring, F. (2000). Andre Gorz and the Sartrean legacy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230288744
   Google Scholar
• Bratus’, B. S., & Lishin, O. V. (1983). Laws of the development of activity and problems in the psychological and pedagogical shaping of the personality. Russian Education & Society, 21(3), 38–50. http://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-939321033810.2753/RES1060-9393210338
   Google Scholar
• Collin, S., & Karsenti, T. (2011). The collective dimension of reflective practice: The how and why. Reflective Practice, 12(4), 569–581.10.1080/14623943.2011.590346
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V., & Kilpatrick, J. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (2008). The future of education: Reimagining our schools from the ground up. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, R. (2009). Who is acting in an activity system? In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 257–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809989
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275. http://doi.org/10.1177/135050760707902610.1177/1350507607079026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, J., & Kerosuo, H. (2013). Expansive learning in a library: Actions, cycles and deviations from instructional intentions. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9089-610.1007/s12186-012-9089-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118–128.10.1080/10749039.2014.891868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2014). ‘I feel like I’ve plateaued professionally … gone a little stale’: Mid-career reflections in a teacher discussion group. Reflective Practice, 15(4), 504–517. http://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.90002910.1080/14623943.2014.900029
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, I. (1998). Hegel and Marx: The concept of need. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galea, S. (2012). Reflecting reflective practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(3), 245–258.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00652.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapasaari, A., & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction , 4(37), 37–47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, C. (2015). Knowing and/or experiencing: A critical examination of the reflective models of John Dewey and Donald Schön. Reflective Practice, 16(3), 361–371.10.1080/14623943.2015.1023281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18.10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2
   Google Scholar
• Lamm, Z. (1976). Conflicting theories of instruction: Conceptual dimensions. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, D. (2007). Approaching worldview structure with ultimate meanings technique. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 47(2), 243–266. http://doi.org/10.1177/002216780629300910.1177/0022167806293009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontiev, D. (2012). From drive to need and further: What is human motivation about? In D. Leontiev (Ed.), Motivation, consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 9–25). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, K. (1982). One is not born a personality. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, J. (1997). Existentialism, feminism and Simone de Beauvoir. London: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230376663
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, K. (2014). Activity theory as a reflective and analytic tool for action research on multi-professional collaborative practice. Reflective Practice, 15(3), 347–362.10.1080/14623943.2014.900007
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., & Pascal, J. (2011). Reflective practice: An existentialist perspective. Reflective Practice, 12(1), 15–26.10.1080/14623943.2011.541089
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., & Pascal, J. (2012). Developing critically reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 13(2), 311–325. http://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.65779510.1080/14623943.2012.657795
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3, 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The change laboratory a tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole (Ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar