Publication Cover
Reflective Practice
International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives
Volume 19, 2018 - Issue 5
3,752
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Depth-hermeneutics: a psychosocial approach to facilitate teachers’ reflective practice?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 638-652 | Received 08 Sep 2017, Accepted 08 Aug 2018, Published online: 09 Nov 2018

References

  • Adamowich, T., Kumsa, M.K., Rego, C., Stoddart, J., & Vito, R. (2014). Playing hide-and-seek: Searching for the use of self in reflective social work practice. Reflective Practice, 15(2), 131–143.
  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.
  • Bereswill, M., Morgenroth, C., & Redman, P. (2010). Alfred Lorenzer and the depth-hermeneutic method. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15(3), 221–250.
  • Bibby, T. (2017). The creative self: Psychoanalysis, teaching and learning in the classroom. London: Routledge.
  • Bion, W.R. (1962). Learning from experience. Nortvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
  • Bion, W.R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London: Routledge.
  • Carrington, G. (2004). Supervision as a reciprocal learning process. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(1), 31–42.
  • Clarke, S. (2002). Learning from experience: Psycho-social research methods in the social sciences. Qualitative Research, 2, 173–194.
  • Clarke, S., & Hoggett, P. (2009). Researching beneath the surface: Psycho-social research methods in practice. London: Karnac.
  • Dausien, B., Hanses, A., Inowlocki, L., & Riemann, G. (2008). The Analysis of Professional Practice, the Self-Reflection of Practitioners, and their Way of Doing Things. Resources of Biography Analysis and Other Interpretative Approaches. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(1). Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative–research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/312
  • Freud, S. (1915). The Unconscious. In J. Strachey & A. Lorenzer (Eds.), On the history of the post psychoanalytic movement, papers on metapsychology and other works (Vol. 14, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Lorenzer ed., pp. 159–209). London: Vintage.
  • Freud, S. (1920–1922). Beyond the pleasure principle; Group psychology; And, other works (Vol. 18). London: Hogarth Press.
  • Froggett, L. (2002). Love, hate and welfare. Psychosocial approaches to policy and practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Froggett, L., Conroy, M., Manley, J., & Roy, A. (2014). Between art and social science: Scenic composition as a methodological device. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(5). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2143/3684
  • Froggett, L., Ramvi, E., & Davies, L. (2014). Thinking from experience in psychosocial practice: reclaiming and teaching ‘use of self’. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community. doi:10.1080/02650533.2014.923389
  • Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis outside the clinic. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gripsrud, BH., Ramvi, E., Froggett, L., Hellstrand, I., & Manley, J. (2018). Psychosocial and symbolic dimensions of the breast explored through a visual matrix. Nora - Nordic Journal Of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(3), 210–229. doi:10.1080/08038740.2018.1482958
  • Hochschild, A.R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
  • Hoggett, P. (2017). Shame and performativity: Thoughts on the psychology of neoliberalism. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society. doi:10.1057/s41282-017-0050-3
  • Hollway, W. (2015). Knowing mothers: Researching maternal identity change. Basingstoke: Pallgrave Macmillan.
  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
  • Hollway, W., & Volmerg, B. (2010). Interpretation Group Method in the Dubrovnik Tradition. Manual.
  • Isenbarger, L., & Zembylas, M. (2006). The emotional labour of caring in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 120–134.
  • Kennedy, E.K., Frederickson, N., & Monse, J. (2008). Do educational psychologists “walk the talk” when consulting? Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(3), 169–187.
  • Klinge, L. (2016). Lærerens relationskompetence [The teacher’s relational competency] (PhD), Copenhagen University, Copenhagen.
  • Krane, V., Karlsson, B., Ness, O., & Kim, H.S. (2016). Teacher-student relationship, student mental health, and dropout from upper secondary school. Scandinavian Psychologist, 3. doi:10.15714/scandpsychol.3.e11
  • Krüger, S. (2017). Dropping depth hermeneutics into Psychosocial Studies – A Lorenzarian perspective. The Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 10(1), 47–66.
  • Krüger, S. (forthcoming). Reinvigorating Scenic Understanding – towards a critical practice of psychoanalytic cultural analysis, 1–47
  • Laursen, P.F. (2006). Den autentiske lærer. Bliv en god og effektiv underviser – Hvis du vil [The authentic teacher: Become a good and effective educator – If you want]. Copenhagen: Gyldendals lærerbibliotek.
  • Layton, L. (2007). What psychoanalysis, culture and society mean to me. Mens Sana Monographs, 5(1), 146–157.
  • Leithäuser, T. (2013). Psychoanalysis, socialization and society – The psychoanalytical thought and Interpretation of Alfred Lorenzer. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3), 56–70.
  • Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.
  • Moos, L., Krejsler, J., & Laursen, P.F. (Eds.). (2004). Relationsprofessioner – Lærere, pædagoger, sygeplejersker, sunhedsplejersker, socialrådgivere og mellemledere [Relational professions – Teachers, pedagogues, nurses, healthcare assistants, social workers and middle managers]. Aarhus: Danmarks Pædagogiske Forlag.
  • Nagbøl, S.P. (2002). Oplevelsesanalyse og subjektivitet [Experiential analysis and subjectivity]. Psyke & Logos, 23(1), 32.
  • Näring, G., Vlerick, P., & Van de Ven, B. (2012). Emotion work and emotional exhaustion in teachers: The job and individual perspective. Educational Studies, 38(1), 63–72.
  • Nordenbo, S.E., Larsen, M.S., Tiftikci, N., Wendt, R.E., & Østergaard, S. (2008). Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i barnehage og skole. Et systematisk review utført for Kunnskapsdepartementet [Teacher competency and children’s learning in kindergarten and school: A systematic review conducted for the Department of Education] (Report No. 8776842487). Aarhus: D. P. Universitetsforlag.
  • Ramvi, E. (2010). Out of control: A teacher’s account. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15(4), 328–345.
  • Ramvi, E. (2017). Passing the buck, or thinking about experience? Conditions for professional development among teachers in a Norwegian middle school. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 139–156.
  • Ramvi, E., & Davies, L. (2010). Gender, mothering and relational work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 24(4), 445–460.
  • Rothe, K., Krüger, S., & Rosengart, D. (forthcoming). Scenic understanding: Translated selections from Alfred Lorenzer’s ‘in-depth hermeneutical cultural analysis’ (1986) (pp. 1–25).
  • Salling Olesen, H. (2012). The societal nature of subjectivity: An interdisciplinary methodological challenge. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1908
  • Salling Olesen, H. (2016). A psycho-societal approach to life histories. In I. Goodson, A. Antikainen, P. Sikes, & M. Andrews (Eds.), The routledge international handbook on narrative and life history (pp. 214–224). London: Routledge.
  • Salling Olesen, H. (2017). Læringsbarrierer, læringsmodstand og læringsforsvar – Prismer for en historisk konfliktutfoldelse [Barriers to learning, resistance to learning and learning defenses – Prisms for a historical conflict expansion]. In K. Mellon (Ed.), Læring eller ikke-læring? (pp. 23–38). Fredrikshavn: Dafolo.
  • Salling Olesen, H., & Weber, K. (2012). Socialization, language, and scenic understanding. Alfred Lorenzer’s contribution to a psycho-societal methodology. 13(3). Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1906
  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Soldz, S., & Andersen, L.L. (2012). Expanding subjectivities: Introduction to the special issue on’new directions in psychodynamic research’. Journal of Research Practice, 8(2), 2.
  • Stray, I.E., & Voreland, H.E. (2017). Refractions of the global educational agenda: Educational possibilities in an ambiguous policy terrain. In T. Rudd & I.F. Goodson (Eds.), Negotiating neoliberalism: Developing alternative educational visions (pp. 87–99). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Thompson, N., & Pascal, J. (2011). Reflective practice: An existentialist perspective. Reflective Practice, 12(1), 15–26.
  • Williams, A. (2013). Critical reflective practice: Exploring a reflective group forum through the use of Bion’s theory of group processes. Reflective Practice, 14(1), 75–87.
  • Youell, B. (2006). The learning relationship: Psychoanalytic thinking in education. London: Karnac.