Enacting learning citizenship: a sociomaterial analysis of reflectivity and knowledge negotiation in higher education

References

• Acton, R. (2017). Place-people-practice-process: Using sociomateriality in university physical spaces research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(14), 1441–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adedokun, O., Carleton Parker, L., Henke, J., & Burgess, W. (2017). Student perceptions of a 21st Century learning space. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2008). Education Investment Fund [Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from http://www.innovation.gov.au/highereducation/Funding/EducationInvestmentFund/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2009). Developing agentic professionals through practice-based pedagogies. Office for Learning and Teaching, Department of Education and Training, Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-developing-agentic-professionals-griffith-2009
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes: Literature Review, State of Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development). Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.deakin.edu.au/arts-ed/efi/pubs/deecd-reports-blackmore-learning-spaces.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces: Re-thinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (2002). What makes a capacity a disposition? (Technical Report 10/03). London: London School of Economics, Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smith, J. (2017). Sacred and secret stories in professional knowledge landscapes: Learner agency in teacher professional learning. Reflective Practice, 18(5), 600–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, S. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G., & Carr, M. (2004). A framework for teaching learning: The dynamics of disposition. Early Years: an International Journal of Research and Development, 24, 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, J. (2010). Teaching in student-centred learning environments. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy, & A. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (Vol. 33, pp. 191–202). Melbourne: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, J. (2015). Time to stop building lecture theatres. Melbourne: Woods Bagot. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from https://issuu.com/woods_bagot/docs/time_to_stop_building_lecture_theat
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) technique: A guide to its use. Retrieved from https://www.kepa.fi/tiedostot/most-significant-change-guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R., & Goldspink, C. (2014). Learner dispositions, self-theories and student engagement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, G., & Kamberelis, G. (2006). Theory for education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63. doi:10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2012). The quality of learning at university: Integrative understanding and distinctive ways of thinking. In J.R. Kirby & M.J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions. instruction, and learning processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2015). Sociomateriality and learning: A critical approach. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of learning (pp. 83–93). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grellier, J. (2013). Rhizomatic mapping: Spaces for learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(1), 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. Retrieved May 12, 2013, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/programmerelated/2006/pub_spaces.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Charteris, J. (2017). Transformative professional learning: An ecological approach to agency through critical reflection. Reflective Practice, 18(4), 496–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Sutcliffe, M., Bragg, J., & Harris, D. (2016). To what extent is capital expenditure in UK higher education meeting the pedagogical needs of staff and students? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(4), 477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keppell, M., & Riddle, M. (2012). Distributed learning spaces: Physical, blended and virtual learning spaces in higher education. In M. Kepple, K. Souter, & M. Riddle (Eds.), Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. (2003). Critical ontology: Visions of selfhood and curriculum. JCT: Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 19(1), 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2006). Making a mess with method. Retrieved November 24, 2016, from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2006MakingaMesswithMethod.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(2), 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melhuish, C. (2011). What matters about space for learning: Exploring perceptions. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader (pp. 81–92). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 575–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., & Morrison, C. (2017). Re/assembling ‘innovative’ learning environments: Affective practice and its politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 749–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, M.D. (2013). Turning around the question of ‘transfer’ in education: Tracing the sociomaterial. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(12), 1276–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W., & Scott, S. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D.N. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D.N., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 269–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reushle, S. (2012). Designing and evaluating learning spaces: PaSsPorT and Design-based research. In M. Kepple, K. Souter, & M. Riddle (Eds.), Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education (pp. 87–101). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J., Sweet, L., & Billett, S. (2013). Preparing medical students as agentic learners through enhancing student engagement in clinical education. Asia Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14, 251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., Macfarlane, L., & Savin-Baden, J. (2008). Learning spaces, agency and notions of improvement: What Influencing thinking and practices about teaching and learning in higher education. An interpretive meta-ethnography. London Review of Education, 6(3), 211–229.
   Google Scholar
• Schrittesser, I., Gerharz-Reiter, S., & Paseka, A. (2014). Innovative Learning Environments: About traditional and new patterns of learning. European Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2003). Case Studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, C., & Andrews, T. (2012). Re-imagining teaching for technology-enriched learning spaces: An academic development model. In M. Kepple, K. Souter, & M. Riddle (Eds.), Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education (pp. 242–265). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2011). Learning spaces as social capital. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader (pp. 137–146). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Times Higher Education. (2013). Why well-designed learning spaces pay educational dividends. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/opinion/why-well-designed-learning-spaces-pay-educational-dividends/2006837.article
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 34–40). New York: Scientific American Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2011). Social learning capacity: Four essays on innovation and learning in social systems. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader (pp. 193–210). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar