Reflecting talks: a pedagogical model in the learning organization

References

• Aagaard Nielsen, K., & Nielsen Steen, B. (2006). Methodologies in action research. In K. Aagaard Nielsen & L. Svensson (Eds.), Action research and interactive research. Beyond practice and theory (pp. 63–87). Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Albinsson, G., & Arnesson, K. (2012). Team learning activities: Reciprocal learning through the development of a mediating tool for sustainable learning. The Learning Organization. The International Jounal of Critical Studies in OrganizationalLearning, 19(6), 456–467.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsdotter, E. (2010). Att framkalla och förändra ordningen [To Provoke and Change the Order]. Stockholm: Gestalthuset Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action. A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesson, K., & Albinsson, G. (2012). Integration of theory and practice in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 5, 370–380.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brocbank, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflecting learning in higher education. Bukingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, J., Turner, J., & Barefoot, H. (2010). Enhancing the student learning experience: The perspective of academic staff. Educational Research, 52(3), 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. Hedegaard, M., & Juul Jensen, U. (Eds.). (1999). Activity theory and social practice. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933/1989). The later works, 1925–1953. Essays and how we think. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle. How can learn collectively. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (1997). The qualitative experience. Learning at disruption in automatized production. Stockholm: Department of Pedagogy, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (Eds). (2003). Dialog samspel och lärande [Dialogue, interplay and learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, A. (2004). Lärande organisationer i teori och praktik: Apoteket lär [Learning organizations in theory and practice: The pharmacy learns]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Ellström, P.-E. (1996). Rutin och reflektion. Förutsättningar och hinder för lärande i dagligt arbete. In I. P.-E. Ellström (Ed.), Livslångt lärande [Lifelong learning] (pp. 142–179). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ernsheimer, P. (2005). Reflektionsteorier. [Reflection theories]. In P. Emsheimer., H. Hansson., & T. Koppfeldt. (Eds.), Den svårfångade reflektionen [The elusive reflection] (pp. 35–41). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government report 192003/04:129. (2003). A Swedish strategy for sustainable development - economic, social and environmental. Stockholm: The Swedish Goverment.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, O. (2003). Hinder för kollektivt lärande i team [Obstacles to collective team learning]. Stockholm: Stockholm universitet: Pedagogiska institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmet, P., & Ericksson, G. (Eds). (1988). Reflection in teacher education. New York: Pacific educational press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, E., & Westberg, H. (2007). Att kombinera ett könsperspektiv med interaktiv forskningsansats: En utmaning i praktik och teori [Combining a gender perspective with an interactive research approach: A challenge in practice and theory]. HSS 07: Jönköping: Higher Education Institutions and Society in Collaboration, Jönköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, J. (2008). Integrating progress files into the academic process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, A. (2003). Practically. Action Research in Theory and Practice – in the wake of LOM ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Gothenburg: Department of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2008). Hållbart ledarskap i skolan [Sustainable leadership in school]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, H. (2011). Critical reflection: Reflecting on learning to be reflective. Reflective Practice, 12(6), 829–839.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2001). Lärande i mötet mellan Piaget, Freud och Marx [Learning in the meeting between Piaget, Freud and Marx]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, R. (2010). Collective (team) learning process models: A conceptual review. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 285–299.
   Google Scholar
• Knutagård, H. (2002). Introduktion till verksamhetsteori [Introduction to activity theory]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koppfeldt, T. (2005). Bearbetning genom bildsamtal [Processing through image conversations]. In P. Emsheimer, H. Hansson, & T. Koppfeldt (Eds.), Den svårfångade reflektionen [The elusive reflection] (pp. 169–178). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, P. (2004). Förändringens villkor- en studie om organisatoriskt lärande och förändring inom skolan [The conditions of change: A study of organizational learning and change in school] ( Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm School of Economics Institute for Research (SIR).
   Google Scholar
• Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (2015). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy., A., & Garavan, T. N. (2008). Team learning and metacognition: A neglected area of HRD research and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 509–524.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, B. (1996). Kunskap i handling. [Knowledge in action]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, B. (1997). Arbetets kunskapsteori [Knowledge theory of work]. Stockholm: Dialoger.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (2000). Reflection in learning & professional development- theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2001). Den överhettade arbetsmänniskan [The overheated hard worker]. In I. D. Tedenljung (Ed.), Pedagogik med arbetslivsinriktning [Pedagogy with working life direction] (pp. pp. 30–66). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2013). Team learning: Collective reflection processes in teacher teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(5), 296–309.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson Neve, T. (2006). Capturing and analyzing emotions to support organizational learning: the affect based learning matrix ( Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm University: Department of Computer and Systems Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson Neve, T. (2014). Hållbart organisatoriskt lärande [Sustainable organizational learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Örtenblad, A. (2007). Senge’s many faces: Problem or opportunity? The Learning Organization, 14(2), 108–122.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods- integration theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö., R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in practice. A sociocultural perspective]. Stockholm: Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner – How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. London: Cornerstone.
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, K., Tempest, S., & McKinlay, A. (Eds.). (2005). How organizations learn: managing the search for knowledge. London: Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L., Ellström, P.-E., & Brulin, G. (2007). Introduction – On interactive research. International Journal of Action Research, 3(3), 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Swieringa, J., & Wierdsma, A. (1992). Becoming a learning organization. Beyond the learning curve. Reading. Massachusetts: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotskij, L. (1934/2001). Thinking and language. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl, A. (Eds). (2018). Det ordnar sig alltid [It always works out]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1993). A sociocultural perspective on mental action. SPOV: Studies of the pedagogical fabric, v 20. Härnösand: Department of pedagogical text interpretation.
   Google Scholar