Machinima as a learning tool

References

• Ambrosini, V. 1995. “Researching Tacit Knowledge: An Empirical Methodology.” Paper presented at British Academy of Management annual conference, Sheffield, September 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Badaracco, J. L. 1991. The Knowledge Link. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. C., and M.Wade 2006. The Kids are Alright: How the Gamer Generation is Changing the Workplace. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., K.Maton, and L.Kervin 2008. “The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (5): 775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bober, M. 2010. “Games Based Experiences for Learning.” Accessed February 22, 2012. http://www.futurelab.org.uk/projects/games-based-experience.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, M., and J. M.King 2011. “Classroom Remix: Patterns of Pedagogy in a Techno-Literacies Poetry Unit.” Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55 (2). 134–144. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L., and E.Edmonds 2011. Interacting: Art, Research and the Creative Practitioner. Faringdon: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, E. 2011. “Undefining Machinima.” In The Machinima Reader edited by H.Lowood and Nitsche, 219–238. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., and C.Button 2011. “Sustainability Transdisciplinary Education Model: Interface of Arts, Science, and Community (STEM).” International Journal Of Sustainability In Higher Education 12 (1): 41–54. doi: 10.1108/14676371111098294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cova, B., S.Pace, and D.Park 2007. “Global Brand Communities across Borders: The Warhammer Case.” International Marketing Review 24 (3): 313–329. doi: 10.1108/02651330710755311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear Fairy. http://vimeo.com/11618270
   Google Scholar
• Dolling, I., and S.Hark 2000. “She Who Speaks Shadow Speaks Truth: Transdisciplinarity in Women's and Gender Studies.” Signs. Summer: 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosk, K. 2011. “Machinima is Growing Up.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 25–30. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C.Limoges, H.Nowotny, and S.Schwartzman 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway, P. 2010. “Peter Greenaway Speaks at 48Hour Film Machinima 2010.” .” Accessed February 6, 2012. http://vimeo.com/groups/8472/videos/15253336.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R. T. 2001. “A Model of 42 Models of Creativity.” Accessed February 27, 2012. http://www.scribd.com/doc/2149673/A-Model-of-42-Models-of-Creativity-by-Richard-Tabor-Greene-20june06-PDF-for-Global-Distribution-FINAL.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, H., and J.Ingram 2007. Machinima for Dummies. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, T. 2011. “Towards a Manifesto for Machinima.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 6–12. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henagulph, S. 2000. “Three Pillars of Transdisciplinarity.” Accessed August 7, 2010. http://www.goodshare.org/pillars.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., and J. D.Sime 2004. “Living on the Border: Knowledge, Risk and Transdisciplinarity.” Futures, 36. 441–456.
   Google Scholar
• Houtman, C. 2011. “Adventures in Remediation: The Making of Echo.” Digital Creativity 22 (4): 263–274. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2011.622285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M. 2011. “Machinima in a Fanvid Ecology.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 51–54. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, A., and L. L.Bucciarelli 2007. “Transdisciplinary Variation in Engineering Curricula: Problems and Means for Solutions.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3): 295–301. doi: 10.1080/03043790701276809.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. 1972. “Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation.” In Interdisciplinarity. Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities edited by L.Apostel, G.Berger, A.Briggs and G.Michaud, 97–121. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J., and S. A.Selber 2007. “Plagiarism, Originality, Assemblage.” Computers & Composition 24 (4): 375–403. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2007.08.003. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2007.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., and B.Shao 2011. “The Net Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education.” Higher Education Academy, York. Accessed February 6, 2012. http://ora.open.ac.uk/30014/.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., and R.Sternberg 2007. “Creativity.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 59 (4): 55–60. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.39.4.55-C4
   Google Scholar
• Kelland, M., D.Morris, and D.Lloyd 2005. Machinima. London: Thomson/Course Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., and P.McLaren 2005. “Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research Methods edited by N. K.Denzin and Y. S.Lincoln, 303–342. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F. 2011. “Machinima's Promise.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 13–18. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T., W.Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R.Haberli, A.Bill, R. W.Scholz, and M.Welti 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science Technology and Society. Berlin: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., and C.Lankshear 2008. “Remix: The Art and Craft of Endless Hybridization.” Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (1): 22–33. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, P. 2011. “Of Games and Gestures: Machinima and the Suspension of Animation.” In The Machinima Reader edited by H.Lowood and M.Nitsche, 159–174. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, K. 2011. “‘A Counter-Friction to the Machine’: What Game Scholars, Librarians, and Archivists Can Learn from Machinima Makers about User Activism.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 100–112. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronfeldner, M. E. 2009. “Creativity Naturalized.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237): 577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.637.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1969. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S. 2011. “Machinima: The Most Impressive LA Tech Company since Myspace.”.” Accessed December 15, 2012. http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/01/machinima-the-most-impressive-la-tech-company-since-myspace/.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E.Wenger 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, M. 2004. “Issues in Work Based Learning.” Cited in Ives, S., R. Morris, and E. Hunt. 2005. “Practising for the Profession.” Higher Education Academy: Art Design and Communication: Northbrook College, Sussex and the University of Derby. http://www.adm.heacademy.ac.uk/library/files/adm-hea-projects/he-in-fe-n-brook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. E., and B.Nadeau 2010. “Post PostScript Please.” Digital Creativity. , 21 (1): 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., and F.Gao 2003. “Why Nonaka Highlights Tacit Knowledge: A Critical Review.” Journal of Knowledge Management 7v (4): 6–14. doi: 10.1108/13673270310492903
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., L.Horton, J.Olmanson, and P.-Y.Wang 2008. “An Exploration of Mashups and their Potential Educational Uses.” Computers In The Schools 25 (3/4): 243–258. doi: 10.1080/07380560802368090
   Google Scholar
• Loisel, P., and M. J.Durand 2005. “Applying Transdisciplinarity to the Complexity of Work Disability Prevention.” Disability Prevention Research and Training Centre, Quebec. Accessed August 7, 2010.http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:RxwVLpeAbDwJ:www.cetrans.com.br/artigos/Patrick_Loisel.pdf+loisel+2002+transdisciplinary&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjys_yUdu_YRAitKeXCGboW9XcblBjlqQLHSglJcOcMjKzozXV8-di2ORCz5ZCR5gcWwgVNUqeH4a1XEkIssXAaFxzq0lMNlFCZJ42rmGWoNJjZWqiUddAH4sQwuhJqysTQ-qqU&sig=AHIEtbTL_E4AH2blWlr9cKvS17TkYsClgQ.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, A., J.Burton, and K.Turvey 2006. “Developing Conceptual Frameworks for Creativity, ICT and Teacher Education.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 1 (1): 3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowood, H. 2005. “Real-Time Performance: Machinima and Games Studies.” International Digital Media and Arts Journal 2 (1): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lowood, H. 2008. “How They Got Game.” Accessed February 6, 2012. http://www.stanford.edu/group/htgg/cgi-bin/drupal/.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2001. Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2007. “Understanding Hybrid Media.” Accessed February 6, 2012. http://manovich.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2011. “Image Future.” In The Machinima Reader edited by H.Lowood and M.Nitsche, 73–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, P. 2004. 3D Game-based Filmmaking: The Art of Machinima. New York: Paraglyph.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 1996. Qualitative Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E., and S.Dawson 2008. “Teaching for Creativity: Towards Sustainable and Replicable Pedagogical Practice.” Higher Education 56 (6): 633–643. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9115-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. 1999. “Blind Variation or Selective Variation? Evaluative Elements in Creative Thought.” Psychological Inquiry 10344–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2002. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. Translated by Karen-Claire Voss. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nideffer, R. F. 2011. “Eight Questions (and Answers) about Machinima.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 66–73. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. 2011a. “A Look Back at Machinima's Potential.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 13–18. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. 2011b. “Machinima as Media.” In The Machinima Reader edited by H.Lowood and M.Nitsche, 113–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. 1991. “The Knowledge-creating Company.” Harvard Business Review, 69 (6). 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2003. “The Potential of Transdisciplinarity, Rethinking Interdisciplinarity, Interdisciplines.” Accessed August 8, 2010. http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/5.
   Google Scholar
• Paras, B., and J.Bizzocchi 2005. “Games, Motivation and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design.” In Proceedings of DiGRA Conference, ‘Changing Views: Worlds in Play’. Vancouver: DiGRA.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchbech, D., and R.Gras 2011. “Machinima: From Art Object to Cultural Practice.” In The Machinima Reader edited by H.Lowood and M.Nitsche, 143–158. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poell, R. F., G. E.Chivers, F. J.van der Krogt, and D. A.Wildemeersch 2000. “Learning-network Theory: Organizing the Dynamic Relationships between Learning and Work.” Managing Learning 31 (1): 25–50. doi: 10.1177/1350507600311004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2011. “Digital Wisdom and Homo Sapiens Digital.” In Deconstructing Digital Natives: Young People, Technology and the New Literacies edited by M.Thomas, 15–30. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, C. M., D. E.Meyer, N.Davidson, A. L.Patalano, and I.Yaniv 1995. “Demystification of Cognitive Insight.” The Nature of Insight edited by R. J.Sternberg and J. E.Davidson, 65–124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, E., and A.Shreeve 2006. “Evaluating Practice-based Learning and Teaching in Art and Design.” Paper presented at The Inquiring Pedagogies (iPED) Research Network Conference, Coventry, September 10. Accessed March 5, 2012. http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/646/.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, E. 2011. “Massively Multiplayer Machinima Mikusuto.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (1): 42–50. doi: 10.1177/1470412910391556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., S.Misra, R. P.Moser, K. L.Hall, and B. T.Taylor 2008. “The Ecology of Team Science: Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration.” American Journal of Preventative Medicine 35 (2): S96–115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. 2009. Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing your World. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., C.Joseph, J.Laccetti, B.Mason, S.Mills, S.Perril, and K.Pullinger 2007. “Transliteracy: Crossing Divides.” First Monday 12 (12). Accessed February 7, 2012. http://frodo.lib.uic.edu/ojsjournals/index.php/fm/article/view/2060/1908. doi: 10.5210/fm.v12i12.2060
   Google Scholar
• Wall, S., and I.Shankar 2008. “Adventures in Transdisciplinary Learning.” Studies In Higher Education, 33 (5). 551–565.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B., S. M.Smith, and R. A.Finke 1999. “Creative Cognition.” In Handbook of Creativity edited by R. J.Sternberg, 189–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. 1993. Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar