Digital eco-art: transformative possibilities

References

• Abram, D. 1996. Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. 2010. Sensibility and Sense: The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World. Exeter: Imprint Academic Philosophy Documentation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. G., J. Jonides, and S. Kaplan. 2008. “Research Report: The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature.” Psychological Science 19: 1207–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. 1996. On Creativity. London: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C., G. G. Colomb, and J. M. Williams. [1995, 2003] 2008. The Craft of Research. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, T. J. 1976. “Field Research Methods: Interviewing, Questionnaires, Participant Observation, Systemic Observation, Unobtrusive Measures.” In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 363–413. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College.
   Google Scholar
• Burtner, M. 2011. “EcoSono: Adventures in Interactive Ecoacoustics in the World.” Organized Sound 16: 234–244. doi: 10.1017/S1355771811000240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler-Kisber, L. 2010. Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, Narrative and Arts Informed Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, L. 2015a. “Technologically Mediated Space and Place: Re-visioning Urban Natural Environments.” Presented at the conference Arts In Society Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, L. 2015b. “LocoMotoArt: Digital Art Practices in Natural Settings.” The International Journal of New Media, Technology and the Arts. Presented at Arts In Society, Budapest, Hungary. Proceedings publication, 10 (1): 1–10. Champaign, IL: Common Grounds.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, L. L., and P. Pasquier. 2011a. “User as Explorer: Interaction with the Natural Environment Using Mobile Projection Technology.” Presented at CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Accessed April 3, 2012. http://side-creative.ncl.ac.uk/userflux/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/LLColes_UserExplorer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coles, L. L., and P. Pasquier. 2011b. “LocoMotoArt: Interacting Within Natural Setting Through Performance Using Pico-projection.” Proceedings of the International Symposium of Electronic Artists, ISEA—Istanbul. Accessed April 3, 2012. http://isea2011.sabanciuniv.edu/ma-candidate.coles
   Google Scholar
• Coles, L. L., P. Pasquier, and D. Gromala. 2012. “Utilizing the Natural Environment for the Exhibition of New Media.” Master thesis. Available from Simon Fraser University Theses Database.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Evernden, N. 1985. The Natural Alien. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning, C. 1995. “Technology, Trauma and the Wild.” In Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth and Healing the Mind, edited by T. G. Rozak, M. E. Gomes, and A. D. Kanne, 41–54. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H. 2011. Technological Nature: Adaptation and the Future of Human Life, xiii. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., and P. H. Hasbach. 2012. “Introduction to Ecopsychology: Science, Totems, and the Technological Species.” In Ecopsychology: Science, Totems, and the Technological Species, edited by P. H. Kahn and P. H. Hasbach, 1–21. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., R. L. Severson, and J. H. Ruckert. 2009. “The Human Relation with Nature and Technological Nature.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 18: 37–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandell, J. J. 1998. “Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of Collage Students.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 1: 1–17. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.11
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. 1997. Kinship To Mastery: Biophilia In Human Evolution and Development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• LocoMotoArt research site. Accessed April 29, 2014. http://www.locomotoart.com/ and http://www.locomotoart.com/locomotoart_field_system
   Google Scholar
• LocoMotoArt residency blog. Accessed April 29, 2014. http://locomotoart.weebly.com/
   Google Scholar
• Lomba-Ortiz, E. A. 2003. “Questioning Ecological Design: A Deep Ecology Perspective.” Accessed May 9, 2012 from Ecotecture: The Journal of Ecological Design. http://www.ecotecture.com/library_eco/appropriate_tech/Lomba-Ortiz_questioningEco.html
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. 2012. The Nature Principle: Reconnecting with Life in a Virtual Age, 4. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, E., and F. Zingrone, eds. 1995. “The Playboy Interview: Marshall McLuhan—A Candid Conversation with the High Priest of Popcult and Metaphysician of Media.” In The Essential McLuhan, 233–269. New York: BasicBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy Hesse-Biber, S., and P. Leavy. 2011. “Designing Qualitative Approaches to Research.” In The Practice of Qualitative Research Second Edition, edited by S. L. Nagy Hesse-Biber, 31–57. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., J. M. Zelenski, and S. A. Murphy. 2011. Happiness Is in Our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well Being. Journal of Happiness Studies 12 (2): 303–322.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2011. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.” In The Digital Divide—Arguments Against Facebook, Google, Texting, and the Age of Social Networking, edited by M. E. Bauerlein, 3–25. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penquin.
   Google Scholar
• Ranciere, J. 2009. Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, S. D. 2012. “The Topophilia Hypothesis: Ecopsychology Meets Evolutionary Psychology.” In Ecopsychology: Science, Totems, and the Technological Species, edited by P. H. Kahn and P. H. Hasbach, 23–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seattle Times, Editorials/Opinion. 2010. “Are we Becoming Addicted to Technology?” May 10. Accessed October 23, 2014. http://seattletimes.com/html/editorials/2011896575_edit19tech.html
   Google Scholar
• Small, G. A., and G. Vorgan. 2011. “Your Brain Is Evolving Right Now.” In The Digital Divide: Arguments for and Against Facebook, Google, Texting, and the Age of Social Networking, edited by M. E. Bauerlein, 76–96. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. 2010. Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, D., with A. McConnell. 1997. The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering Our Place in Nature. Vancouver: Greystone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B. 2005. Nature, Technology and the Sacred. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1974. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• University of Maryland. April, 2010. “Merrill Study: College Students Unable to Disconnect.” http://www.merrill.umd.edu/deadline/index.php/2010/04/22/merrill-study-college-students-unable-to-disconnect/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar