Crafting animated parables: an embodied approach to representing lifestyle behaviours for reflection

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antle, A. N., G. Corness, and M. Droumeva. 2009. “What the Body Knows: Exploring the Benefits of Embodied Metaphors in Hybrid Physical Digital Environments.” Interacting with Computers 21: 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyon, D. 2012. “Presence in Blended Spaces.” Interacting with Computers 24: 219–226. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., and C. N. Klokmose. 2016. “Dynamics, Multiplicity and Conceptual Blends in HCI.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 7–12, San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, S. B. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M.-C., S.-P. Chang, Y.-C. Chang, H.-H. Chu, C. C.-H. Chen, F.-H. Hsiao, and J.-C. Ko. 2009. “Playful Bottle: A Mobile Social Persuasion System to Motivate Healthy Water Intake.” Paper presented at the Ubicomp, Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, K. K. N. 2018. “Sketching Imaginative Experiences: From Operation to Reflection via Lively Interactive Artifacts.” International Journal of Design 12 (2): 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, K. K. N. 2019. “Toward a Language of Blended Causality for Transforming Behavioral Data into Reflective User Experiences.” Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, K. K. N., and D. F. Harrell. 2012. “Understanding Material-Based Imagination: Cognitive Coupling of Animation and User Action in Interactive Digital Artworks.” Leonardo Electronic Almanac 17 (2): 50–64. doi:10.5900/SU_9781906897161_2012.17(2)_50.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, K. K. N., B. D. Leong, and B. Y. H. Lee. 2018. “Imagining Consequences of Excessive Smartphone Use via a Character-Based Mobile Application.” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 16 (6): 1404–1419. doi:10.1007/s11469-018-9966-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consolvo, S., P. Klasnja, D. W. McDonald, and J. A. Landay. 2014. “Designing for Healthy Lifestyles: Design Considerations for Mobile Technologies to Encourage Consumer Health and Wellness.” Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 6 (3-4): 167–315.
   Google Scholar
• Consolvo, S., D. W. McDonald, T. Toscos, M. Y. Chen, J. Froehlich, B. Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, et al. 2008. “Activity Sensing in the Wild: A Field Trial of UbiFit Garden.” Paper presented at the CHI ‘08 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 5–10, Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., G. Betley, J. Kahle, L. Abrams, and J. Porac. 1981. “When Trying to Win: Competition and Intrinsic Motivation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7 (1): 79–83. doi:10.1177/014616728171012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke. 2011. “From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining ‘Gamification’.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning future media environments.
   Google Scholar
• Fallman, D. 2008. “The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration.” Design Issues 24 (3): 4–18. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Froehlich, J., T. Dillahunt, P. Klasnja, J. Mankoff, S. Consolvo, B. Harrison, and J. A. Landay. 2009. “UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits.” Paper presented at the CHI ‘09 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 4–9, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Froehlich, J., L. Findlater, M. Ostergren, S. Ramanathan, J. Peterson, I. Wragg, Eric Larson, et al. 2012. “The Design and Evaluation of Prototype Eco-Feedback Displays for Fixture-Level Water Usage Data.” Paper presented at the CHI ‘12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 5–10, Austin, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, K., C. Luginbuhl, Y. Shao, and R. T. Correia. 2020. “Encasing Computation: Using Digital Fabrication Approaches to Make Microcontrollers Wearable.” Paper presented at the TEI ‘20: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, February 14–17, 2016, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• He, H. A., S. Greenberg, and E. M. Huang. 2014. “One Size Does Not Fit All: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design.” Paper presented at the CHI 2010 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Dandan, Melanie Tory, Bon Adriel Aseniero, Lyn Bartram, Scott Bateman, Sheelagh Carpendale, Anthony Tang, and Robert Woodbury. 2015. “Personal Visualization and Personal Visual Analytics.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21 (3): 420–433. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2359887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtienne, J., and J. H. Israel. 2007. “Image Schemas and Their Metaphorical Extensions – Intuitive Patterns for Tangible Interaction.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, February 15–17, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Imaz, M., and D. Benyon. 2007. Designing with Blends: Conceptual Foundations of Human-Computer Interaction and Software Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jetter, H.-C., H. Reiterer, and F. Geyer. 2014. “Blended Interaction: Understanding Natural Human–Computer Interaction in Post-WIMP Interactive Spaces.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18 (5): 1139–1158. doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0725-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, D., and D. F. Harrell. 2018. “The Effects of Badges and Avatar Identification on Play and Making in Educational Games.” Paper presented at the CHI ‘18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and S. S. Sundar. 2012. “Visualizing Ideal Self vs. Actual Self Through Avatars: Impact on Preventive Health Outcomes.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (4): 1356–1364. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., F. Greaves, C. Exeter, and A. Darzi. 2013. “‘Gamification’: Influencing Health Behaviours with Games.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 106 (3): 76–78. doi:10.1177/0141076813480996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 2012. “Explaining Embodied Cognition Results.” Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4): 773–785. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, Nicholas D., Mu Lin, Mashfiqui Mohammod, Xiaochao Yang, Hong Lu, Giuseppe Cardone, Shahid Ali, et al. 2014. “BeWell: Sensing Sleep, Physical Activities and Social Interactions to PromoteWellbeing.” Mobile Networks and Applications 19 (3): 345–359. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0484-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschke, M., and M. Hassenzahl. 2011. “Mayor or Patron? The Difference Between a Badge and a Meaningful Story.” Paper presented at the CHI 2011, May, 7–12, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Li, I., A. Dey, and J. Forlizzi. 2010. “A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems.” Paper presented at the CHI 2010 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 10–15, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B. J., and M. O. Lwin. 2016. “Player See, Player Do: Testing an Exergame Motivation Model Based on the Influence of the Self Avatar.” Computers in Human Behavior 59: 350–357. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J., L. Mamykina, S. Lindtner, G. Delajoux, and H. B. Strub. 2006. “Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game.” Paper presented at the Ubicomp.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M. 1992. “How to Build a Baby: II. Conceptual Primitives.” Psychological Review 99 (4): 587–604. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen, T., and P. G. Krogh. 2008. “Mapping Cultural Frame Shifting in Interaction Design with Blending Theory.” International Journal of Design 2 (2): 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekler, E. D., F. Brühlmann, A. N. Tuch, and K. Opwis. 2017. “Towards Understanding the Effects of Individual Gamification Elements on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 71: 525–534. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima, T., V. Lehdonvirta, E. Tokunaga, and H. Kimura. 2008. “Reflecting Human Behavior to Motivate Desirable Lifestyle.” Paper presented at the DIS 2008 Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems, February 25–27, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, F., N. Verdezoto, G. Fitzpatrick, M. Kyng, E. Grönvall, and C. Storni. 2015. “Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22 (6): 1–45. doi:10.1145/2803173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2013. “A Foundation for the Study of Behavior Change Support Systems.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17 (5): 1223–1235. doi:10.1007/s00779-012-0591-5.
   Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen, H., and M. Harjumaa. 2008. “A Systematic Framework for Designing and Evaluating Persuasive Systems.” Paper presented at the PERSUASIVE 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pinske, D., B. Weyers, W. Luther, and T. Stevens. 2012. “Metaphorical Design of Feedback Interfaces in Activity-Aware Ambient Assisted-Living Applications.” Paper presented at the Ambient Assisted Living and Home Care, 4th International Workshop, IWAAL, December 3–5, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. 2017a. “Designing Interactive Systems Through a Game Lens: An Ethnographic Approach.” Computers in Human Behavior 71: 455–468. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. 2017b. “Drawing Inspiration from World of Warcraft: Gamification Design Elements for Behavior Change Technologies.” Interacting with Computers 29 (5): 648–678. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwx001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A., and F. Cena. 2016. “Personal Informatics for Everyday Life: How Users Without Prior Self-Tracking Experience Engage with Personal Data.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 94: 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A., and M. Tirassa. 2017. “Know Thyself: A Theory of the Self for Personal Informatics.” Human–Computer Interactions 32 (5-6): 335–380. doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1285704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitberger, W., W. Spreicer, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2014. “Situated and Mobile Displays for Reflection on Shopping and Nutritional Choices.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18 (7): 1721–1735. doi:10.1007/s00779-014-0781-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooksby, J., M. Rost, A. Morrison, and M. Chalmers. 2014. “Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics.” Paper presented at the CHI 2014 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 26 to May 1, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiraishi, M., Y. Washio, C. Takayama, V. Lehodonvirta, H. Kimura, and T. Nakajima. 2009. “Using Individual, Social and Economic Persuasion Techniques to Reduce CO2 Emissions in a Family Setting.” Paper presented at the Persuasive ‘09, Claremont, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L., and K. K. N. Chow. 2017. “An Embodied Approach to Designing Meaningful Experiences with Ambient Media.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2 (2): 13.
   Google Scholar
• Wardrip-Fruin, N., and P. Harrigan. 2004. First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. T., T. Bhamra, and D. Lilley. 2015. “The Considerations and Limitations of Feedback as a Strategy for Behaviour Change.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 8 (3): 186–195. doi:10.1080/19397038.2015.1006299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., and J. Forlizzi. 2008. “The Role of Design Artifacts in Design Theory Construction.” Artifact 2 (1), doi:10.1080/17493460802276893.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology 30: 75–89. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, O., and A. Gal-Oz. 2014. “Deconstructing Gamification: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Continuous Measurement, Virtual Rewards, and Social Comparison for Promoting Physical Activity.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18 (7): 1705–1719. doi:10.1007/s00779-014-0783-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar