A framework for interactive artwork based on cultural heritage: focused on the evaluation of artistic value in the artwork ‘deBallution’ prototypes

References

• Ahmedien, D. A. M. 2017. “Reactivating the Neural Dimension Role in Interactive Arts.” Leonardo 50 (2): 182–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apperley, T. H. 2013. “The Body of the Gamer: Game Art and Gestural Excess.” Digital Creativity 24 (2): 145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.808967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Reuben M., and A. K. David. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., and B. Moyers. 2011. “The Power of Myth.” Anchor: 121–124.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L., and Ferguson S. 2014. “Evaluation and Experience in Art.” In Springer Series on Cultural Computing, 25–48. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, I. C. 2011. “Digital Media and the Quest for the Spiritual.” In Virtual Worlds: Aesthetics and Semantic Concepts: Aesthetics and Semantic Concepts, edited by Gianluca Mura, 217–227. Pennsylvania: Art. Metaplasticity.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., and W. S. Lai. 2017. “Conceptual and Aesthetic Dimensions of an ECG/RESP Sensor Artwork.” Leonardo 50 (1): 68–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corallo, A., M. Esposito, M. Marra, and C. Pascarelli. 2019. “Transmedia Digital Storytelling for Cultural Heritage Visiting Enhanced Experience.” International conference on augmented reality, virtual reality and computer graphics. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cordeiro, J., F. Martins de Abreu, and G. Estadieu. 2017. “Audience Participation in Interactive Art Systems.” Proceedings of the ARTECH.
   Google Scholar
• Ćosović, Marijana, and Belma Ramić Brkić. 2020. “Game-based Learning in Museums—Cultural Heritage Applications.” Information 11 (1): 22.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, B. 2007. “A Pleasure Framework.” Leonardo 40 (4): 370–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2007.40.4.370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, B., L. Muller, S. Amitani, and E. Edmonds. 2005. “Understanding the Experience of Interactive Art: Iamascope in Beta_space.” Proceedings of the second Australasian conference on interactive entertainment 49–56. Creativity & Cognition Studios Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damiano, R., and V. Lombardo. 2016. “Labyrinth 3D. Cultural Archetypes for Exploring Media Archives.” Digital Creativity 27 (3): 234–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2016.1212899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiano, R., V. Lombardo, A. Lieto, and D. Borra. 2016. “Exploring Cultural Heritage Repositories with Creative Intelligence. The Labyrinth 3D System.” Entertainment Computing 16: 41–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, A. C. C., A. T. Tavares, and V. G. Soares. 2013. “Management of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Digital Media Using Pamin.” Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2013 IEEE International Conference on 1-6. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. D. 2006. “Game Design Narrative for Learning: Appropriating Adventure Game Design Narrative Devices and Techniques for the Design of Interactive Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 54 (3): 245–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-8806-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Franco, P. D. G., J. L. Matthews, and T. Matlock. 2016. “Framing the Past: How Virtual Experience Affects Bodily Description of Artefacts.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 17: 179–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, E. F., and M. C. C. Baranauskas. 2018. “Interart: Learning Human-Computer Interaction through the Making of Interactive Art.” Lecture notes in computer science international conference on human-computer interaction. Cham: Springer, 35–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91238-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, E. 2010. “The Art of Interaction.” Digital Creativity 21 (4): 257–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2010.556347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, E., G. Turner, and L. Candy. 2004. “Approaches to Interactive Art Systems.” Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia. Academic Medicine, 113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Eliade, M. 1998. Myth and Reality. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fels, S. 2000. “Intimacy and Embodiment: Implications for Art and Technology.” Proceedings of the. ACM Workshops on Multimedia 2000, 13–16, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., J. Li, H. Wang, and G. Feng. 2018. “Digiclay: An Interactive Installation for Virtual Pottery Using Motion Sensing Technology.” Proceedings of the 4th international conference on virtual reality.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, Y., and E. A. Kyza. 2017. “The Development and Validation of the ARI Questionnaire: An Instrument for Measuring Immersion in Location-Based Augmented Reality Settings.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98: 24–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., D. Weng, H. B. L. Duh, Y. Liu, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Effects of Using HMDs on Visual Fatigue in Virtual Environments.” In 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 249–250. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Heitlinger, S., and N. Bryan-Kinns. 2013. “Understanding Performative Behaviour Within Content-Rich Digital Live Art.” Digital Creativity 24 (2): 111–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.808962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her, J. 2014. “An Analytical Framework for Facilitating Interactivity Between Participants and Interactive Artwork: Case Studies in MRT Stations.” Digital Creativity 25 (2): 113–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.776974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, J. 2013. Complex/Archetype/Symbol in the Psychology of CG Jung, 21. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, J. Y., H. Byeongwon, and B. Lee. 2019. “Survey and Analysis of Interactive Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America: 1979–2017.” Leonardo 52 (3): 284–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolay, S. 2016. “Cultural Heritage Preservation of Traditional Indian Art Through Virtual New-Media.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 225: 309–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.030
   Google Scholar
• Lieto, A., and R. Damiano. 2013. “Building Narrative Connections among Media Objects in Cultural Heritage Repositories.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, edited by HartmutKoenitz Tonguc Ibrahim Sezen, Gabriele Ferri, Mads Haahr, Digdem Sezen and Güven Çatak. 257–260. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H. L., J. Lin, and Y. P. Hung. 2019. “Interactive Art— Smiling Buddha: Recording the Moment at Which an Observer Smiles Through Sight Detection and Smile Recognition.” Leonardo 52 (2): 179–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, P., T. Martins, H. Amaro, and P. H. Abreu. 2016. “Beyond Interactive Evolution: Expressing Intentions Through Fitness Functions.” Leonardo 49 (3): 251–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, K., L. Loke, and L. Hespanhol. 2020. Designing with Ritual Interaction: A Novel Approach to Compassion Cultivation Through a Buddhist-Inspired Interactive Artwork.” Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Mateas, M. 2001. “A Preliminary Poetics for Interactive Drama and Games.” Digital Creativity 12 (3): 140–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/digc.12.3.140.3224
   Google Scholar
• Mok, S., S. Lee, and J. Paik. 2014. “Between: Interactions among Human Participants as an Interface in Media Art.” Journal of Arts and Imaging Science 1 (1): 6–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.15323/techart.2014.02.1.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, L., E. Edmonds, and M. Connell. 2006. “Living Laboratories for Interactive Art.” CoDesign 2 (4): 195–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880601008109
   Google Scholar
• Nam, H. Y., and M. Nitsche. 2014. “Interactive Installations as Performance: Inspiration for HCI In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction.” Academic Medicine 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Nardelli, E. 2014. “A Viewpoint on the Computing-Art Dialogue: The Classification of Interactive Digital Artworks.” Leonardo 47 (1): 43–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palombini, A. 2017. “Storytelling and Telling History. Towards a Grammar of Narratives for Cultural Heritage Dissemination in the Digital Era.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 24 (2): 134–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.10.017
   Google Scholar
• Pan, M. K. X. J., and G. Niemeyer. 2017. “Catching a Real Ball in Virtual Reality.” In IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 2017, 269–270. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Propp, V. 2010. Morphology of the Folktale, 9. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravetto-Biagioli, K. 2010. “Shadowed by Images: Rafael Lozano-Hemmer and the Art of Surveillance.” Representations 111 (1): 121–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2010.111.1.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieser, M.. 2002. Computers and Art. Second Edition, 81–96. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. L. 2009. “From Narrative Games to Playable Stories: Toward a Poetics of Interactive Narrative.” Storyworlds: a Journal of Narrative Studies 1 (1): 43–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/stw.0.0003
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., and D. Burton. 2013. Virtual Puppetry: Assisting the Elder’s Life Review.
   Google Scholar
• She, J., C. Ng, and D. Leung. 2015. “Drag A Star: The Social Media in Outer Space.” In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 723–726. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Spierling, U., D. Grasbon, N. Braun, and I. Iurgel. 2002. “Setting the Scene: Playing Digital Director in Interactive Storytelling and Creation.” Computers and Graphics 26 (1): 31–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(01)00176-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2013. Interactive Art and Embodiment: The Implicit Body as Performance. Canterbury: Gylphi Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Tzima, S., G. Styliaras, G. Smyris, and A. Bassounas. 2018. “Digital Representations and Cultural Heritage Interactions through the “Greek Type” Watermills Case, 2018.” 9th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Won, H., and J. Yu. 2018. “Interactive Media Art Based on Location and Motion Tracking of Multi-Performers.” Euro-Mediterranean Conference. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaobo, L., and L. Yuelin. 2014. “Embodiment, Interaction and Experience: Aesthetic Trends in Interactive Media Arts.” Leonardo 47 (2): 166–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younan, S., and C. Treadaway. 2015. “Digital 3D Models of Heritage Artefacts: Towards a Digital Dream Space.” Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 2 (4): 240–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2015.11.001.
   Google Scholar