Digital prototyping, open design, and sustainability in industrial design education: a case study

References

• Adams, C. 2014. “Techne and Logos at the Edge of Space.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 99–113. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. 2011. “Orchestral Manoeuvres in Design.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 24–31. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Avital, M. 2011. “The Generative Bedrock of Open Design.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 48–58. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bakırlıoğlu, Y., and Ç Doğan. 2020. “Exploring Product/Part Longevity in Open Design of Small Kitchen Appliances.” The Design Journal 23 (6): 885–905. doi:10.1080/14606925.2020.1826635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakırlıoğlu, Y., and C. Kohtala. 2019. “Framing Open Design Through Theoretical Concepts and Practical Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.” Human–Computer Interaction 34 (5–6): 389–432. doi:10.1080/07370024.2019.1574225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beegan, G., and P. Atkinson. 2008. “Professionalism, Amateurism and the Boundaries of Design.” Journal of Design History 21 (4): 305–313. doi:10.1093/jdh/epn037
   Google Scholar
• Bonvoisin, J. 2017. “Limits of Ecodesign: The Case for Open Source Product Development.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 10 (4–5): 198–206. doi:10.1080/19397038.2017.1317875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. I. 2014. “Prototyping for High-Value, Time-Poor Users.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 125–140. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, B., and K. Wood. 2018. “Principles of Maker and DIY Fabrication: Enabling Design Prototypes at low Cost.” Design Studies 58: 63–88. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. D. 2017. “Lay Designers: Grassroots Innovation for Appropriate Change.” Design Issues 33 (1): 30–47. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Mul, J. 2011. “Redesigning Design.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 34–39. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Design Justice. 2018. Design Justice Network Principles. https://designjustice.org/read-the-principles.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, L., G. Adviseurs, J. S. M. Vergeest, and I. Horváth. 1998. “Testing Shape Manipulation Tools Using Abstract Prototypes.” Design Studies 19: 187–201. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00034-3
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2015. Frame Innovation. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Zanfaly, D. 2015. “[I3] Imitation, Iteration and Improvisation: Embodied Interaction in Making and Learning.” Design Studies 41: 79–109. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fab Academy. 2022. What is Fab Academy. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from https://fabacademy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., and E. Giaccardi. 2006. “Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of end User Development.” In End User Development: Empowering People to Flexibly Employ Advanced Information and Communication Technology, edited by H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, and V. Wulf, 427–457. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, K., S. Hielscher, and T. Merritt. 2016. “Making Things in Fab Labs: A Case Study on Sustainability and co-Creation.” Digital Creativity 27 (2): 113–131. doi:10.1080/14626268.2015.1135809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparotto, S. 2019. “Open Source, Collaboration, and Access: A Critical Analysis of “Openness” in the Design Field.” Design Issues 35 (2): 17–27. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. 2005. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop – from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. 2009. “Six Challenges Facing User-Oriented Industrial Design.” Design Journal 12 (1): 41–67. doi:10.2752/175630609X391569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. 2014. “Computer-embedded Design: PAIPR Prototyping.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 141–154. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, G. 2014. “Investigating the Unexplored Possibilities of Digital–Physical Toolkits in Lay Design.” International Journal of Design 8 (2): 15–28. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/viewFile/1513/619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummels, C. 2011. “Teaching Attitudes, Skills, Approaches, Structure and Tools.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 162–167. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, T., and C. Mota. 2011. “A Strategists Guide to Digital Fabrication.” Strategy + Business 64, August 23. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/11307.
   Google Scholar
• Jégou, F., E. Manzini, and A. Meroni. 2004. “Design Plan. A Design Toolbox to Facilitate Solution Oriented Partnerships.” In Solution Oriented Partnership, edited by E. Manzini, L. Collina, and S. Evans, 107–118. Cranfield: Cranfield University.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., C. W. Elverum, and M. Steinert. 2017. “Eliciting Unknown Unknowns with Prototypes: Introducing Prototrials and Prototrial-Driven Cultures.” Design Studies 49: 1–31. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, A., P. Kisch, and M. Mirata. 2005. “Distributed Economies - A new Engine for Innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (10–11): 971–979. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadish, D., and A. Dulic. 2015. “Crafting Sustainability: Approaching Wicked Environmental Problems Through High–low Tech Practice.” Digital Creativity 26 (1): 65–81. doi:10.1080/14626268.2014.998682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, T., and T. Vardouli. 2015. “Editorial: Computational Making.” Design Studies 41: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Kohtala, C. 2017. “Making “Making” Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology.” Design Journal 20 (3): 375–394. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohtala, C., S. Hyysalo, and J. Whalen. 2020. “A Taxonomy of Users’ Active Design Engagement in the 21st Century.” Design Studies 67: 27–54. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnakumar, S., C. Berdanier, C. Lauff, C. McComb, and J. Menold. 2022. “The Story Novice Designers Tell: How Rhetorical Structures and Prototyping Shape Communication with External Audiences.” Design Studies 82: 101–133. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2022.101133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurvinen, E., I. Koskinen, and K. Battarbee. 2008. “Prototyping Social Interaction.” Design Issues 24 (3): 46–57. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitio, T. 2011. “From Best Design to Just Design.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 190–198. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Maldini, I. 2016. “Attachment, Durability and the Environmental Impact of Digital DIY.” Design Journal 19 (1): 141–157. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1085213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, E., and H. Lipson. 2007. “Fab@Home: The Personal Desktop Fabricator Kit.” Rapid Prototyping Journal 13 (4): 245–255. doi:10.1108/13552540710776197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2009. “New Design Knowledge.” Design Studies 30: 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menold, J., K. Jablokow, and T. Simpson. 2017. “Prototype for X (PFX): A Holistic Framework for Structuring Prototyping Methods to Support Engineering Design.” Design Studies 50: 70–112. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., A. Berlin, J. Menold, and M. Parkinson. 2020. “The Role of Digital Prototyping Tools in Learning Factories.” Procedia Manufacturing 45: 528–533. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.073
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, N. 2011. “Variable Property Rapid Prototyping.” Virtual and Physical Prototyping 6 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1080/17452759.2011.558588
   Google Scholar
• Pantzar, M. 2000. “Consumption as Work, Play, and Art: Representation of the Consumer in Future Scenarios.” Design Issues 16 (3): 3–18. doi:10.1162/07479360052053298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peetrakis, K., A. Wodehouse, and A. Hird. 2019. “Physical Prototyping Rationale in Design Student Projects: An Analysis Based on the Concept of Purposeful Prototyping.” Design Science 7: e7. doi:10.1017/dsj.2021.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., S. Baurley, and S. Silve. 2014. “Citizen Science and Open Design: Workshop Findings.” Design Issues 30 (4): 52–66. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijken, D. 2011. “Design Literacy: Organizing Self-Organization.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 152–158. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. 2000. “Dematerializing Consumption Through Service Substitution is a Design Challenge.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 (1): 3–6. doi:10.1162/108819800569230
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N. 2014. “Prototyping for Design Spaces of the Future.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 59–73. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the new Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrage, M. 1999. Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrage, M. 2014. “Crafting Interactions: The Purpose and Practice of Serious Play.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 19–28. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stappers, P. J., F. S. Visser, and S. Kistemaker. 2011. “Creation and Co: User Participation in Design.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 140–148. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stikker, M. 2011. “Introduction.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 14–19. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thackara, J. 2011. “Into the Open.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 42–45. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2015. How to do Your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, L. 2014. “Introduction.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 1–17. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van Abel, B., L. Evers, and R. Klaassen. 2011. “Preface.” In Open Design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by B. van Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen, and P. Troxler, 10–13. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Beek, S. 2012. “From Representation to Rhizome: Open Design from a Relational Perspective.” The Design Journal 15 (4): 423–442. doi:10.2752/175630612X13437472804259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzoli, C., F. Ceschin, L. Osanjo, M. K. M’Rithaa, R. Moalosi, V. Nakazibwe, and J. C. Diehl. 2018. Designing Sustainable Energy for All. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Von Busch, O. 2012. “Generation Open: Contested Creativity and Capabilities.” The Design Journal 15 (4): 443–460. doi:10.2752/175630612X13437472804295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar