Critical computational relations in design, architecture and the built environment: editorial

References

• Amoore, L. 2020. Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arboleda, M. 2020. Planetary Mine: Territories of Extraction Under Late Capitalism. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Atanasoski, N., and K. Vora. 2019. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J., Y.-W. Lin, and P. Goodale. 2016. “Data Journeys: Capturing the Socio-Material Constitution of Data Objects and Flows.” Big Data & Society 3 (2): 205395171665450. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. M. 2011. The Computational Turn: Thinking About the Digital Humanities. Culture Machine, 12. https://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/10-Computational-Turn-440-893-1-PB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Birhane, A. 2020. “Algorithmic Colonization of Africa.” SCRIPT-Ed 17 (2): 389–409. https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.170220.389.
   Google Scholar
• Boeva, Y., A. Berger, A. Bischof, O. Doggett, H. Heuer, J. Jarke, P. Treusch, R. A. Søraa, Z. Tacheva, and M.-L. Voigt. 2023. “Behind the Scenes of Automation: Ghostly Care-Work, Maintenance, and Interferences.” Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573830.
   Google Scholar
• Bridle, J. 2018. New Dark Age: Technology, Knowledge and the End of the Future. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2013. Objects of Intense Feeling: The Case of the Twitter API. Computational Culture, 13. http://computationalculture.net/objects-of-intense-feeling-the-case-of-the-twitter-api/.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2020. “Nothing to Disconnect From? Being Singular Plural in an Age of Machine Learning.” Media, Culture & Society 42 (4): 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., and T. Gebru. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (pp. 77–91). PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. 2016. “How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 205395171562251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canizares, G. 2020. “Technologies of the Virtual Other.” Journal of Architectural Education 74 (2): 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2020.1790933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso Llach, D. 2015. Builders of the Vision: Software and the Imagination of Design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso Llach, D., and A. Burbano. 2020. “Other Computations: Digital Technologies for Architecture from the Global South.” Dearq 27: 6–19. https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq27.2020.01.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, M. 2022. “Computing Views, Remodeling Environments.” Social Studies of Science 52 (2): 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charitonidou, M. 2022. “Urban Scale Digital Twins in Data-Driven Society: Challenging Digital Universalism in Urban Planning Decision-Making.” International Journal of Architectural Computing 20 (2): 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771211070005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, W. H. K. 2013. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• coons, ginger, and Ratto, M. 2015. “Grease Pencils and the Persistence of Individuality in Computationally Produced Custom Objects.” Design Studies 41: 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Hester, C. 2020. Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691194172
   Google Scholar
• Fazi, M. B. 2018. Contingent Computation: Abstraction, Experience, and Indeterminacy in Computational Aesthetics. Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. 2020. “Smart Forests and Data Practices: From the Internet of Trees to Planetary Governance.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 205395172090487. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720904871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golumbia, D. 2009. The Cultural Logic of Computation. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helmond, A. 2015. “The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready.” Social Media + Society 1 (2): 205630511560308. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, L. 2015. “Difference and Dependence among Digital Workers: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (1): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaton, F. 2021. “Assessing Biases, Relaxing Moralism: On Ground-Truthing Practices in Machine Learning Design and Application.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 205395172110135. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungnickel, K. 2023. “Speculative Sewing: Researching, Reconstructing, and Re-imagining Wearable Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 53 (1): 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221119213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., G. W. Young, and O. Dawkins. 2021. “Planning and 3D Spatial Media: Progress, Prospects, and the Knowledge and Experiences of Local Government Planners in Ireland.” Planning Theory & Practice 22 (3): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1921832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp, C., K. Braun, and Y. Boeva. 2022. “Echo Chambers of Urban Design: Platformization in Architecture and Planning.” In Platformization of Urban Llife: Towards a Technocapitalist Transformation of European Cities, edited by A. Strüver, and S. Bauriedl, 237–258. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839459645-015
   Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., and S. Marvin. 2020. Urban Operating Systems: Producing the Computational City. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malazita, J. W., and K. Resetar. 2019. “Infrastructures of Abstraction: How Computer Science Education Produces Anti-Political Subjects.” Digital Creativity 30 (4): 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1682616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. C. 2021. A City Is Not a Computer: Other Urban Intelligences. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, M., and J. Posada. 2022. “The Data-Production Dispositif.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (CSCW2): 1–460. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mommersteeg, B. 2022. “Approximations: On Some Ways to Listen to a Building “in the Making.”.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 016224392211169. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439221116964.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, L. 2014. “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the Racialization of Early Electronic Manufacture.” American Quarterly 66 (4): 919–941. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2014.0070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel, V. A. A. 2020. “Situated Computations: Bridging Craft and Computation in the Trinidad and Tobago Carnival.” Dearq 27: 62–75. https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq27.2020.05.
   Google Scholar
• Noel, V. A., Y. Boeva, and H. Dortdivanlioglu. 2021. “The question of access: Toward an equitable future of computational design.” International Journal of Architectural Computing 19 (4): 496–511. doi:10.1177/14780771211025311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önal, G. 2020. “Media Ecologies of the ‘Extractive View.’.” Footprint 14 (2), https://doi.org/10.7480/FOOTPRINT.14.2.4694.
   Google Scholar
• Özkar, M. 2020. “The Matter of Shape: A computational Approach to Making in Architectural Heritage (Survey).” In Advances in Mathematical Sciences: AWM Research Symposium, Houston, TX, April 2019, edited by B. Acu, D. Danielli, M. Lewicka, A. Pati, R. V. Saraswathy, and M. Teboh-Ewungkem, 339–347. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42687-3_22
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, J.-C. 2019. “Data Cleaners for Pristine Datasets: Visibility and Invisibility of Data Processors in Social Science.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (1): 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918781268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A. B. 2021. Undoing Optimization: Civic Action in Smart Cities. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K., S. Shorey, B. R. Craft, and H. Remick. 2018. “Making Core Memory: Design Inquiry into Gendered Legacies of Engineering and Craftwork.” Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174105.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2020. “The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism.” Antipode 52 (2): 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toupin, S. 2016. Feminist Hacking/Making: Exploring new gender horizons of possibility. The Journal of Peer Production. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/feminist-hackingmaking-exploring-new-gender-horizons-of-possibility/.
   Google Scholar
• Treusch, P. 2021. Robotic Knitting: Re-crafting Human-Robot Collaboration Through Careful Coboting. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Tubaro, P., A. A. Casilli, and M. Coville. 2020. “The Trainer, the Verifier, the Imitator: Three Ways in Which Human Platform Workers Support Artificial Intelligence.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 205395172091977. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., D. Nieborg, and T. Poell. 2019. “Reframing Platform Power.” Internet Policy Review 8 (2), https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velkova, J., and J.-C. Plantin. 2023. “Data Centers and the Infrastructural Temporalities of Digital Media: An Introduction.” New Media & Society 25 (2): 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221149945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiessner, M. 2022, December 7-10. Substitution, Sequestration, Sink? Parsing Speculative Carbon Flows across Forests and the Built Environment [Paper presentation]. Society for Social Studies of Science/ECOSITE Joint Annual Meeting, Cholula, Mexico.
   Google Scholar