15
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Intermediate coronary artery stenosis: evidence-based decisions in interventions to avoid the oculostenotic reflex

&
Pages 195-206 | Published online: 10 Jul 2009

  • Meier B, Cruentzig AR, Goebel N, et al. Assessment of stenosis in coronary angioplasty: inter and intraobserver variability. Int J Cardiol 1983; 3: 159-169.
  • Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976; 53: 627-632.
  • DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of the coronary angiograms. Circulation 1977; 55: 324-328.
  • Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, et al. Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 1974; 49: 703-708.
  • Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE. Correlation of the antemortem coronary angiogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973; 47: 162-169.
  • Arnett E, lsner J, Redwood D, et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91: 350-356.
  • Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 529-545.
  • Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Cosgrove DM, et al. Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims database. Circulation 1993; 87: 1489-1497.
  • Sones FM, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1962; 31: 735-738.
  • Could KE, Eipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenosis on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol 1974; 34: 48-55.
  • Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1782-1788.
  • Goldstein RA, Kirkeeide RE, Demer EE, et al. Relation between geometric dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man. J Clin Invest 1987; 79: 1473-1478.
  • Heller El, Gates C, Popma J, et al. lntracoronary doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201 Tl imaging and coronary angiography. Circulation 1997; 96: 484-490.
  • Joye JD, Schulman DS, Easorda D, et al. lntracoronary doppler guidewire versus stress single photon emission computed tomographic Thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 940-947.
  • Kern MJ. Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 2000; 101: 1344-1351.
  • Rensing BJ, Hermans MD, Deckers JW, et al. Eumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty nears a Gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographie study in 1445 successfully dilated lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 939-945.
  • Reiber JHC, Kooijman CJ, Slager CJ, et al. Coronary artery dimensions from cineangiograms-methodology and validation of a computer-assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1984; M12: 131-141.
  • Mancini GB, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, et al. Automated quantitative coronary angiography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographie method. Circulation 1987; 75: 452-460.
  • Reiber J, van der Zwei PMJ, Von Land CD, et al. On line quantification of coronary angiograms with the DCl system. Medicamundi 1989; 34: 89-98.
  • van der Zwei PM, Reiber JH. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 216-224.
  • Akishita M, Ouchi Y, Kozaki K, et al. Accuracy and reliability of quantitative measurement of coronary arterial stenosis by videodensitometiy on coronary angiogram. Jpn Heart) 1992; 33: 631-641.
  • Azuma A, Sawada T, Katsume H, et al. Quantitative measurements of balloon-to-artery ratios in coronary angioplasty. J Cardiol 1991; 21: 879-888.
  • Balkin J, Rosenmann D, Ilan M, Zion MM. Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry and by digital calipers. Cardiology 1992; 81: 238-244.
  • Baptista J, Arnese M, Roelandt JR, et al. Quantitative coronary angiography in the estimation of the functional significance of coronary stenosis: correlations with dobutamine-atropine stress test. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1434-1439.
  • Popma JJ, Dehmer GJ, Eichhorn EJ. Variability of coronary flow reserve obtained immediately after coronary angioplasty. lnt J Cardiac Imaging 1990; 6: 31-38.
  • Lansky AJ, Popma JJ. Qualitative and quantitative angiography. In: Topol EJ, ed., Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1999
  • Stadius ML, Alderman EL. Coronary artery revascularization--critical need for, and consequences of, objective angiographie assessment of lesion severity. Circulation 1990; 82: 2231-2234.
  • Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology-the dissociation between clinical and angiographie findings in ischemie heart disease. Circulation 1995; 92: 2333-2342.
  • Blankenhorn DH, Curry PJ. The accuracy of arteriography and ultrasound imaging for atherosderosis measurement: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1982; 106: 483-490.
  • Nissen SE. Radiographie principles in cardiac catheterization. In: Roubin GS, Califf RM, O'Neill W, Phillips H, Stack R, eds, Interventional Cardiac Catheterization: Principles and Practice. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc, 1993.
  • Nissen SE, Tuzku EM, DeFranco AC, Moliterno D. Evaluation of stenosis severity: quantitative angiography, coronary flow reserve, and intravascular ultrasound. In: Ellis SG, Holmes D, eds. Strategic Approaches to Coronary Intervention. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
  • Dehmer GJ, Popma JJ, van der Berg EK, et al. Reduction in the rate of early restenosis after coronary angioplasty by a diet supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 733-740.
  • Lesperance J, Hudon G, White CW, et al. Comparison by quantitative angiographie assessment of coronary stenosis of one view showing the severest narrowing to two orthogonal views. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 462-465.
  • Loaldi A, Polese A, Montorsi P, et al. Comparison of nifedipine, propranolol and isosorbide dinitrate on angiographie progression and regression of coronary arterial naiTowings in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 433-439.
  • Isner JM, Kishel J, Kent KM. Accuracy of angiographie determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Circulation 1981; 63: 1056-1061.
  • DeFranco AC, Tuzku M, Eaton G, et al. Detection of unrecognized LMCA disease by intravascular ultrasound in patients undergoing interventions: prevalence and severity. Circulation 1993; 88 (Suppl 4 Part 2): 1-411 (abstract).
  • Topol EJ. Coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 970-980.
  • Topol EJ, Califf RW, George BS, et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 581-588.
  • TIMl Research Group. Immediate versus delayed catheterization and angioplasty following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: TlMl 11 A results. JAMA 1988; 260: 2849-2858.
  • Simoons ML, Arnold AER, Betriu A, et al. Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction : no additional benefits from immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Lancet 1988; 1: 197-203.
  • Serruys PW, Van Hout B, Bonnier H, et al, for the Benestent Study Group. Randomized comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet 1998; 352: 673-681.
  • Serruys PW, Kay IP. Benestent II, a remake of Benestent I? Or a step towards the era of stentoplasty? Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 779-781.
  • Ellis SG, Mooney MR, George BS, et al. Randomized trial of late elective angioplasty versus conservative management for patients with residual stenosis after thrombolytic therapy of myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992; 86: 1400-1406.
  • Gruentzig AR, King SB III, Schlumpf M, Siegenthaler W. Long term follow up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the early Zurich experience. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1127-1132.
  • The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1689-1696.
  • The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled and balloon angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. The EPISTENT Investigators. Evaluation of Platelet Ilb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting. Lancet 1998; 352: 87-92.
  • Fishman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
  • Serruys PW, linger F, van Hout BA, et al on behalf of the ARTS study group. The ARTS (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study): backgrounds, goals and methods, lnt J Cardiovasc Intervent 1999; 2: 41-50.
  • Weber KI, Janicki JS. The metabolic demand and oxygen supply of the heart: physiologic and clinical considerations. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44: 722-729.
  • Kern MJ, Donohue TJ. Evaluation of myocardial blood flow and metabolism. In: Bairn DS, Grossman W, eds, Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins: 1996.
  • Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW. Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. Circulation 1987; 75: 723-732.
  • McGinn AL. Coronary vasodilator reserve after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1988: 78: 1200-1209.
  • Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW. Effects of coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty on coronaiy blood flow and flow reserve. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1988; 31: 95-114.
  • Klocke FJ. Measurement of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation 1987; 76: 1183-1189.
  • Leiboff R Bren G, Katz R, et al. Determinants of transstenotic gradients observed during angioplasty: an experimental model. Am J Cardiol 1983: 52: 1311-1317.
  • Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Bach RG, Caracciolo EA, Donohue TJ. Interventional physiology rounds: translesional pressureflow velocity assessment in patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 31: 49-60.
  • Kern MJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ. From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronaiy physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 613-620.
  • De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Paulus WJ, et al. Trans-stenotic coronary pressure gradient measurements in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guidewire. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 119-126.
  • Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, et al. Validation of a doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 1992; 85: 1899-1911.
  • Emanuelsson H, Dohnal M, Lamm C, Tenerz L. Initial experience with a miniaturized pressure transducer during coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991: 24: 127-143.
  • Baumgart D, Haude M, Liu F, et al. Fractional velocity reserve--a new index for stenosis severity assessment with good correlation to fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(suppl A): 126 A.
  • Donohue TJ, Kern MJ, Aguirre FV. Assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis: analysis of translesional pressure-flow relations in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 449-458.
  • Segal J, Kern MJ, Scott NA, et al. Alterations of phasic coronary artery flow velocity in man during percutaneous coronaiy angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 276-286.
  • Kajiya F, Ogasawara Y, Tsujioka K, et al. Analysis of flow characteristics in poststenotic regions of the human coronary artery during bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1987; 76: 1092-1100.
  • De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, et al. Simultaneous coronaiy pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reseive. Circulation 1996; 94: 1842-1849.
  • Strauer BE. The significance of coronaiy reserve in clinical heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 775-783.
  • Danzi GB, Pirelli S, Mauri L, et al. Which variable of stenosis severity best describes the significance of an isolated left anterior descending coronary artery lesion? Correlation between quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary doppler measurements and high dose dipyridamole echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 526-533.
  • Miller DD, Donohue TJ, Younis LT, et al. Correlation of pharmacologie 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 1994: 89: 2150-2160.
  • Schulman SS, Lasorda D, Farah T, et al. Correlations between coronaiy flow reserve measured with doppler guide wire and treadmill exercise testing. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 99-104.
  • Piek JJ, Boersma E, di Mario C, et al on behalf of DEBATE study group. Angiographie and doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 466-474.
  • Melin JA, Piret EJ, Vanbutsele RJM, et al. Diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography and thallium myocardial scintigraphy in patients without previous myocardial infarction: a bayesian approach. Circulation 1981; 63: 1019-1024.
  • Could KE, Eipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiology basis for assessing critical coronaiy stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronaiy hyperemia as measures of coronaiy flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1974: 33: 87-94.
  • Rothman MT, Baim DS, Simpson JB, Harrison DC. Coronaiy hemodynamics during FTCA. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1615-1622.
  • De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Paulus WJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new 0.015" fluid-filled guide wire for distal pressure monitoring during I1TCA. Circulation 1991; 84(Suppl 11): 11-301.
  • Meier B, Euethy P, Finci E, Steffenino G, Rutishauser W. Coronaiy wedge pressure in relation to spontaneously visible and recruitable collaterals. Circulation 1987; 75: 906-913.
  • Maclsaac HC, Knudtson ME, Robinson VJ, Manyari DE. Is the residual translesional pressure gradient useful to predict regional myocardial perfusion after percutaneous transluminal coronaiy angioplasty? Am Heart J 1989; 117: 783-790.
  • Chokshi SK, Meyers S, Abi-Mansour P. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: ten years' experience. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1987; 30: 147-210.
  • De Bruyne B, Meier B, Finci E, Urban P, Rutishauser W. Potential protective effect of high coronaiy wedge pressure on left ventricular function after coronaiy occlusion. Circulation 1988; 78: 566-572.
  • Pijls NHJ, Aengevaeren WRM, Uijen GJH, et al. The concept of maximal flow ratio for immediate evaluation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty result by videodensitometry. Circulation 1991; 83: 854-865.
  • Pijls NHJ, Jacques AM, Kikeeide RE, De Bruyne B, Could KE. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronaiy, myocardial and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous tranluminal coronaiy angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 86: 1354-1367.
  • Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronaiy artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703-1708.
  • Pijls NHJ, Bech GJW, El Carnal MlH, et al. Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemie events. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25; 1522-1528.
  • Could KL. Functional measures of coronary stenosis severity at cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 198-199.
  • Seabra-Gomes R. Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: it does make sense, but why don't I do it more often? Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 422-424.
  • Pijls NHJ, Kern MJ, Yock PC, De Bruyne B. Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 1-16.
  • Pijls NHJ, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92: 3183-3193.
  • De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Heyndrickx GR. Relation between myocardial fractional flow reseive calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1995; 92: 39-46.
  • Van der Voort P, Van Hagen E, Hendrix G, et al. Comparison of intravenous adenosine to intracoronary papaverine for calculation of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39: 120-125.
  • Bartunek J, Van Schuerbeeck E, De Bruyne B. Comparison of exercise electrocardiography with invasively assessed myocardial fractional flow reseive in evaluation of severity of coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 478-481.
  • De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, et al. Coronaiy flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans--validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation 1994; 89: 1013-1022.
  • Huffman JlE. Maximal coronary flow and the concept of coronaiy vascular reseive. Circulation 1984; 70: 153-159.
  • Marcus ML, Mueller TM, Gascho JA, Kerber RE. Effects of cardiac hypertrophy secondaiy to hypertension on the coronary circulation. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44: 1023-1031.
  • Nabel EG, Ganz JB, Alexander RW, Selwyn AP. Dilation of normal and constriction of atherosclerotic coronaiy arteries caused by the cold presser test. Circulation 1988; 77: 43-52.
  • Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B. Coronaiy Pressure. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
  • Seller C, Meier B. To measure pressure for pleasure--or is intracoronary pressure gauging pressing? Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 17-18 (editorial comment).
  • Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, et al. Atherosclerosis in angiographically 'normal' coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1479-1485.
  • Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. lntracoronaiy stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995; 91: 1676-1688.
  • de Jaegere P, Mudra H, Almagor Y, et al. In-hospital and 1-month clinical results of an international study testing the concept of IVUS guided optimized stent expansion alleviating the need of systemic anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27 (Suppl A): 137A (abstr).
  • Popma JJ, Baim DS, Kuntz RE, et al. Early and late quantitative angiographie outcomes in the Optimal Atherectomy Restenosis Study (OARS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27 (Suppl A):291A (abstr).
  • Hosokawa H, Suzuki T, Ueno K, et al. Clinical and angiographie follow-up of Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty following Coronary Atherectomy Study (ABACAS). Circulation 1996,94: 1-318 (abstr).
  • Abizaid A, Mehran R, Pichard AD, et al. Results of highpressure ultrasound-guided Oversized' balloon PTCA to achieve 'stent-like' results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 280A (abstr).
  • Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Small stent size and intimai hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 720-724.
  • Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996; 94: 1247-1254.
  • Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, et al. Chronic arterial responses to stent implantation: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of Palmaz-Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1134-1139.
  • Hermiller JB, Buller CE, Tenaglia AN, et al. Unrecognized left main coronary artery disease in patients undergoing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 173-176.
  • Davies SW, Winterton SJ, Rothman MT, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to assess left main stem coronary artery lesion. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 524-526.
  • Hanekamp CEE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NHJ, Michels HR, Bonnier HJRM. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999; 99: 1015-1021.
  • Kern MJ, Dupouy P, Drury JH, et al. Role of coronary artery lumen enlargement in improving coronary blood flow after balloon angioplasty and stenting: a combined intravascular ultrasound Doppler flow and imaging study. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997; 29: 1520-1527.
  • Ge J, Erbel R, Zamorano J, et al. Improvement of coronary morphology and blood flow after stenting: assessment by intravascular ultrasound and intracoronaiy Doppler. lnt J Cardiac Imaging 1995; 11: 81-87.
  • Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, lshii Y, et al. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999; 100:250-255.
  • Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographie determinants of the coronary flow reseive before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 423-428.
  • Moses JW, Undermir C, Strain JE, et al. Relation between single tomographic intravascular ultrasound image parameters and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity in patients with intermediately severe coronary stenoses. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 988-994
  • Vogel R. Hypolipidemic intervention and plaque stabilization. In: Topol EJ, ed., Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1999.
  • Brown BG, Zhao XQ, Sacco DE, Albers JJ. Eipid lowering and plaque regression: new insights into prevention of plaque disruption and clinical events in coronaiy disease. Circulation 1993; 87: 1781-1790.
  • Fuster V, Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture: mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction: insights from studies of vascular biology. Circulation 1994; 90: 2126-2146.
  • Davies MJ, Krikler DM, Katz D. Atherosclerosis: inhibition or regression as therapeutic possibilities. Br Heart J 1991; 65:302-310.
  • RITA-2 trial participants. Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. Lancet 1997; 350: 461-468.
  • Bech GJW, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, et al on behalf of DEFER Investigators. Deferral versus performance of PTCA based on coronary pressure derived fractional flow reserve: the DEFER study. Eur Heart J 1999; 20 (Abstr Suppl): 371.
  • Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, et al. Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 178-187.
  • Ferrari M, Schnell B, Werner GS, Figulla HR. Safety of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal coronaiy flow velocity reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 82-87.
  • Bech GJW, De Bruyne B, Bonnier HJRM, et al. Long term follow up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronaiy pressure measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:841-847.
  • Eesser JL, Wilson RF, White CW. Physiologic assessment of coronaiy stenoses of intermediate severity can facilitate patient selection for coronaiy angioplasty? Coron Artery Dis 1990; 1: 697-705.
  • Gruberg L, Kapeliovich M, Roguin A, et al. Deferring angioplasty in intermediate coronary lesions based on coronaiy flow criteria is safe: comparison of a deferred group to an intervention group. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 1999; 2:35-40.
  • Serruys PW, di Mario C, Piek J, et al for the DEBATE Study Group. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty. The DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe). Circulation 1997; 96: 3369-3377.
  • Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Sousa E, et al. DEBATE II: Final results of the 6-month follow-up. Eur Heart J 1999; 20 (AbstrSuppl): 371.
  • Eafont AM. The FROST Study Group. The French Optimal Stenting Trial (FROST): a multicenter, prospective randomized study comparing systematic stenting to angiography/ coronary flow reserve guided stenting: 6 month clinical and angiographie follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(Suppl A): 89A.
  • Di Mario C. The DESTINl-CFR (Doppler Endpoints Stent International Investigation) Study group. Doppler and QCA guided aggressive PTCA has the same target lesion revascularization of stent implantation: 6-month-results of the DESTlNl study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(Suppl A): 47A.
  • Di Francesco E, Di Mario C, De Gregorio J, et al on behalf of the DESTlNl-CFR Investigators. Clinical, angiographie and physiologic predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(Suppl A): 12A.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.