- Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS et al, on behalf of the STRESS Investigators. A randomized comparison of coro-nary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treat-ment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
- Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij L et al, on behalf of the Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expand-able-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-495.
- Barragan P, Sainsous J, Silvestri M et al. Ticlopidine and sub-cutaneous heparin as an alternative regimen following coro-nary stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 32: 133-138.
- Hoffmann R, Mintz GS. Coronaiy in-stent restenosis - pre-dictors, treatment and prevention. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1739-1749.
- Weintraub WS. Economics and outcomes of coronary stenting: are stents right for everybody? J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 200-202.
- Nakamura S, Mahon DJ, Maheswaran B et al. An explanation for discrepancy between angiographie and intravascular ultrasound measurements after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 633-639.
- Serruys PW, Di Mario C, Piek J et al. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assess-ing the short and long-term outcome of coronary balloon angioplasty. The DLBATE Study (Doppler End-points Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe) Circulation 1997; 96: 3369-3377.
- Di Mario C, Moses JW, Anderson TJ et al. Randomized com-parison of elective stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler on behalf of the DLSTlNl Study Group (Doppler Endpoint STenting INternational Investiga-tion). Circulation 2000; 102: 2938-2944.
- Lafont A, Dubois-Rande JL, Steg PC, et al. The French ran-domized optimal stenting trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 404-409.
- Waksman R, Bhargava B, Mintz GS et al. Late total occlusion after intracoronaiy brachytherapy for patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 65-68.
- Cantor WJ, Peterson ED, Popma JJ et al. Provisional stenting strategies: systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1142-1151.
- Rodriguez A, Ayala F, Bernardi V et al. Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1351-1357.
- Bech GJ, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angio-plasty. Circulation 1999; 99: 883-888.
- Dupouy P, Pelle G, Carol P et al. Physiologically guided angioplasty in support to a provisional stenting strategy: immediate and six-month outcome. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 2000; 49: 369-375.
- Haase KH, Athanasiadis A, Mahrholdt H et al. Acute and 1 year follow-up results after vessel size adapted FTCA using intracoronary ultrasound. Fur Heart J 1998; 19: 263-272.
- Ormiston JA, Webster MW, Ruygrok PN et al. A randomized study of direct coronary stent delivery compared with stent-ing after predilatation: the NlR future trial. On behalf of the NlR Future Trial Investigators. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50: 377-381.
- Vernon Anderson H, Carabello BA. Provisional versus routine stenting: routine stenting is here to stay. Circulation 2000; 102:2910-2913.
International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume 4, 2001 - Issue 2