Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes

References

• Windeckers S, Meyer BJ, Bonzel T, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1994. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 40-54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB, Popma JJ, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM. An overview of US coronary stent trials. Semin Intervent Cardiol 1996; 1: 247–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belli G, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Stenting for ischemic heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1997; 40: 159–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al, Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischman DL, Leon MB, Bairn DS, et al. Stent Restenosis Study I. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwaidi JA, Berger PB, Holmes DR. Coronary artery stents. Clin Cardiol 2000; 284: 1828–34.
   Google Scholar
• Figulla HR, Mudra H, Reifart N, Werner GS. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation: a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 43: 245–52; discussion 253.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman ER, Rogers C. Hoop dreams: stents without restenosis. Circulation 1996; 6: 1199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C, Parikh S, Seifert P, Edelman ER. Endogenous cell seeding: remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996; 94: 2909–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers C, Edelman ER. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 2995–3001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SC, Bairn DS, Schatz RA, et al, Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group. Immediate results and late outcomes after stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions: the multicenter US Palmaz-Schatz stent experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 704–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DR, Jr. Technical aspects. In: Vliestra RE HDJ, eds, Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis 1987: 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wong P, Wong C, Cheng C, et al. Early clinical experience with the Multi-Link coronary stent. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39: 413–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carozza JP, Hermiller JB, Linnemeier TJ, et al. Quantitative coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasound assessment of a new nonarticulated stent: report from the advanced cardiovascular systems Multilink stent pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Oemsrawsingh PV, Schalij MJ, Srimahachota S, Jukema JW, Bruscheke AV. Clinical and angiographic outcome of stent implantation without predilatation using the Jostent Flex stent. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 187–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Ruygrok PN, Webster MWI, et al. Mechanical properties of five long stents compared. J Invas Cardiol 1998; 10: 35A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann M, Werner GS, Ferrari M, Richartz BM, Figulla HR. Direct coronary stent implantation without predilatation - a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design. Z Kardiol 1999; 88: 123–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danzi GB, Capuano C, Fiocca L, et al. Stent implantation without predilatation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1250- 53: A8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Ruygrok PN, et al, on behalf of the NIR Future Trial Investigators. A randomized study of direct coronary stent delivery compared with stenting after predilatation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50: 377–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chevalier B. Select Lesion Indication for Direct Stenting (SLIDE). Presentation during the Guidant Symposium at the Paris Course on Revascularization, 26 May 2000: (www.directstent.org) (abstr).
   Google Scholar
• Bairn DS, Flatley M, Caputo R et al. Comparison of PREDilatation vs. Direct Stenting In Coronary Treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1364–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrie D, Khalife K, Citron B, et al. Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilation in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 693–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laarman GJ, Muthusamy TS, Swart H, et al. Direct coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50: 443–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentoussis D, Guerin Y, Funck F, et al. Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the Multilink stent. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1437–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselka J, Tesar D, Mates M, et al. Treatment of significant coronary stenoses using stents without preliminary balloon angioplasty: present status, results, perspectives. Vnitr Lek 1998; 44: 693–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernandez JM, Riesco Riesco JF, Rodriguez Entem F, Figueroa Olabarria A, Zueco Gil J, Colman T. A direct stent without predilatation. Our experience in 300 lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 1999; 52: 301–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz I, Assali A, Solodky A, et al. Effectiveness of coronary stent deployment without predilatation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 89-91: A8.
   Google Scholar
• Hamon M, Richardeau Y, Lecluse E, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation in acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 55–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigouri C, Sheiban I, De Gregorio J, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1910–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan AW, Carere RG, Solankhi N, Dodek A, Webb JG. Coronary stenting without predilatation in a broad spectrum of clinical and angiographic situations. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SH, Berger BP, Mathew V, et al. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 937–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz I, Assali A, Solodky A, et al. Coronary stent deployment without predilatation in acute myocardial infarction: a feasible, safe and effective technique. Angiology 1999; 50: 901–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz I, Assali A, Solodky A, et al. Coronary stenting without predilatation (SWOP): applicable technique in every day practice. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 384–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez JM, Gomez I, Rodriguez-Entem F, Zueco J, Figueroa A, Colman T. Evaluation of direct stent implantation without predilatation by intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 1028-30: A8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veselka J, Mates M, Tesar DB, Aschermann M, UrbanovaT, Honek T. Direct stenting without predilatation: a new approach to coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis 2000; 11: 503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina A, Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, et al. Primary stent treatment in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Rev Esp Cardiol 1997; 50: 63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolte J, Diefenbach C, von Olshausen K. Coronary stent implantation without preliminary dilatation. Z Kardiol 1999; 87: 707–14.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor AJ, Broughton A, Federman J, et al. Efficacy and safety of direct stenting in coronary angioplasty. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 560–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernandez JM, Gomez Consalez, Rodriquez entem F, et al. Intravascular ultrasonographic evaluation of direct stents implanted without predilatation. Comparison of results according to lesion types. Rev Esp Cardiol 2000; 53: 1335- 41.
   Google Scholar
• Herz I, Assali A, Adler A, et al. Coronary stent deployment without predilatation: prevention of complications of venous graft angioplasty. Angiology 1998; 49: 613–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Hout B, Bonnier H, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet 1998; 352: 673- 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assesment of the mechanisms and predictors of restenosis following coronary angioplasty. J Invas Cardiol 1997; 9: 303–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Hong MK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to discern device-specific effects and mechanisms of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 18–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Bairn DS. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RS, Huber KG, Murphy JG, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 267–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers C, Karnovsky MJ, Edelman ER. Inhibition of experimental neointimal hyperplasia and thrombosis depends on the type of vascular injury and the site of drug administration. Circulation 1993; 88: 1215–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonan R, Paiement P, Scortichini D, Cloutier MJ, Leung TK. Coronary restenosis in a swine model: evaluation of restenosis injury index. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1334–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KKL, et al. Economics of elective coronary revascularization: comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1052–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KKL, et al. Evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of stenting as a treatment for symptomatic single vessel coronary disease: use of a decisionanalytic model. Circulation 1994; 89: 1859–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton JM, Kearney MT, Wainwright RJ. Shifting the balance: direct stenting, a novel approach to improve the cost effectiveness of intra-coronary stenting. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar