MRI‐guided myocardial cell therapy

References

• Wollert K. C., Meyer G. P., Lotz J., et al. Intracoronary autologous bone‐marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 141–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten M. B., Abolmaali N. D., Assmus B., et al. Infarct remodeling after intracoronary progenitor cell treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (TOPCARE‐AMI): mechanistic insights from serial contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2003; 108: 2212–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanborn T. A., Hackett N. R., Lee L. Y., et al. Percutaneous endocardial transfer and expression of genes to the myocardium utilizing fluoroscopic guidance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 260–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee M., Yeung A. C., Altman P., et al. Evaluation of the percutaneous intramyocardial injection for local myocardial treatment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 271–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornowski R., Fuchs S., Tio F. O., Pierre A., Epstein S. E., Leon M. B. Evaluation of the acute and chronic safety of the biosense injection catheter system in porcine hearts. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 48: 447–53, discussion 454–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs S., Satler L. F., Kornowski R., et al. Catheter‐based autologous bone marrow myocardial injection in no‐option patients with advanced coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1721–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perin E. C., Dohmann H. F. R., Borojevic R., et al. Transendocardial, Autologous Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation for Severe, Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure. Circulation 2003; 107: 2294–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits P. C., van Geuns R. J., Poldermans D., et al. Catheter‐based intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts as a primary treatment of ischemic heart failure: clinical experience with six‐month follow‐up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 2063–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes C. E., Jr, Bashore T. M. Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 348–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick A. J., Raman V. K., Raval A. N., et al. Invasive human magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility during revascularization in a combined XMR suite. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 265–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard C., Susil R. C., Choyke P., et al. MRI‐guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5T scanner. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 1414–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi R., Hill D. L., Keevil S. F., et al. Cardiac catheterisation guided by MRI in children and adults with congenital heart disease. Lancet 2003; 362: 1877–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimsky C., Ganslandt O., Von Keller B., Romstock J., Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative high‐field‐strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients. Radiology 2004; 233: 67–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman M. A. L. R., McVeigh E. R. The cardiovascular interventional MRI suite: design considerations. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Established and Emerging Applications., F Lardo, Fuster, Chronos, editors, London 2003; pp. 391–402, In
   Google Scholar
• Guttman M. A., Lederman R. J., Sorger J. M., McVeigh E. R. Real‐time volume rendered MRI for interventional guidance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002; 4: 431–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunold P., Maderwald S., Ladd M. E., Jellus V., Barkhausen J. Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 506–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhn R. D., Tisdale J. F., Agricola B., Metzger M. E., Donahue R. E., Dunbar C. E. Retroviral marking and transplantation of rhesus hematopoietic cells by nonmyeloablative conditioning. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 1783–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi P. A., Hematti P., von Kalle C., Dunbar C. E. Genetic marking as an approach to studying in vivo hematopoiesis: progress in the non‐human primate model. Oncogene 2002; 21: 3274–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adonai N., Nguyen K. N., Walsh J., et al. Ex vivo cell labeling with 64Cu‐pyruvaldehyde‐bis(N4‐methylthiosemicarbazone) for imaging cell trafficking in mice with positron‐emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 3030–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte J. W., Zhang S., van Gelderen P., et al. Neurotransplantation of magnetically labeled oligodendrocyte progenitors: magnetic resonance tracking of cell migration and myelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 15256–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin M., Carlesso N., Tung C. H., et al. Tat peptide‐derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18: 410–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte J. W., Douglas T., Witwer B., et al. Magnetodendrimers allow endosomal magnetic labeling and in vivo tracking of stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19: 1141–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds K. A., Hill J. M., Shapiro E. M., et al. Highly efficient endosomal labeling of progenitor and stem cells with large magnetic particles allows magnetic resonance imaging of single cells. Blood 2003; 102: 867–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill J. M., Dick A. J., Raman V. K., et al. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of injected mesenchymal stem cells. Circulation 2003; 108: 1009–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraitchman D. L., Heldman A. W., Atalar E., et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of mesenchymal stem cells in myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003; 107: 2290–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank J. A., Miller B. R., Arbab A. S., et al. Clinically applicable labeling of mammalian and stem cells by combining superparamagnetic iron oxides and transfection agents. Radiology 2003; 228: 480–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab A. S., Yocum G. T., Kalish H., et al. Efficient magnetic cell labeling with protamine sulfate complexed to ferumoxides for cellular MRI. Blood 2004; 104: 1217–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham C. H., Arai T., Yang P. C., McConnell M. V., Pauly J. M., Conolly S. M. Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 999–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X., Yeung C. J., Ji H., Serfaty J. M., Atalar E. Thermal effect of intravascular MR imaging using an MR imaging‐guidewire: an in vivo laboratory and histopathological evaluation. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8: MT 113–7
   Google Scholar
• Melzer A. S. D., Busch M. MR‐compatible instruments for interventional MRI. Interventional MRI. Mosby‐Year Book, St Louis 1999; pp. 55–69, In
   Google Scholar
• Unal O., Korosec F. R., Frayne R., Strother C. M., Mistretta C. A. A rapid 2D time‐resolved variable‐rate k‐space sampling MR technique for passive catheter tracking during endovascular procedures. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 356–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omary R. A., Unal O., Koscielski D. S., et al. Real‐time MR imaging‐guided passive catheter tracking with use of gadolinium‐filled catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11: 1079–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C. L., Souza S. P., Darrow R. D. Real‐time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 411–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick A. J., Guttman M. A., Raman V. K., et al. Magnetic resonance fluoroscopy allows targeted delivery of mesenchymal stem cells to infarct borders in Swine. Circulation 2003; 108: 2899–904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman R. J., Guttman M. A., Peters D. C., et al. Catheter‐based endomyocardial injection with real‐time magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002; 105: 1282–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickers C., Gallegos R., Seethamraju R. T., et al. Applications of magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac stem cell therapy. J Interv Cardiol 2004; 17: 37–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karmarkar P. V., Kraitchman D. L., Izbudak I., et al. MR‐trackable intramyocardial injection catheter. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 1163–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed M., Lee R., Martin A., et al. Transendocardial delivery of extracellular myocardial markers by using combination X‐ray/MR fluoroscopic guidance: feasibility study in dogs. Radiology 2004; 231: 689–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corti R., Badimon J., Mizsei G., et al. Real time magnetic resonance guided endomyocardial local delivery. Heart 2005; 91: 348–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim R. J., Wu E., Rafael A., et al. The use of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman M. A., Dick A. J., Raman V. K., Arai A. E., Lederman R. J., McVeigh E. R. Imaging of myocardial infarction for diagnosis and intervention using real‐time interactive MRI without ECG‐gating or breath‐holding. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 354–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraitchman D. L., Sampath S., Castillo E., et al. Quantitative ischemia detection during cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing by use of FastHARP. Circulation 2003; 107: 2025–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters D. C., Lederman R. J., Dick A. J., et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction for active catheter imaging with adaptable temporal resolution and catheter‐only views. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 216–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters D. C., Guttman M. A., Dick A. J., Raman V. K., Lederman R. J., McVeigh E. R. Reduced field of view and undersampled PR combined for interventional imaging of a fully dynamic field of view. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 761–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman P. M., Han Z., Palasis M., Barry J. J., Lederman R. J. Incomplete retention after direct myocardial injection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 55: 392–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits P. C., van Langenhove G., Schaar M., et al. Efficacy of percutaneous intramyocardial injections using a nonfluoroscopic 3‐D mapping based catheter system. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2002; 16: 527–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman V. K., Karmarkar P. V., Guttman M. A., et al. Real‐time magnetic resonance‐guided endovascular repair of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm in swine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 2069–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raval A. N., Telep J. D., Guttman M. A., et al. Real‐time magnetic resonance imaging‐guided stenting of aortic coarctation with commercially available catheter devices in Swine. Circulation 2005; 112: 699–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardo A. C., McVeigh E. R., Jumrussirikul P., et al. Visualization and temporal/spatial characterization of cardiac radiofrequency ablation lesions using magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000; 102: 698–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickers C., Jerosch‐Herold M., Hu X., et al. Magnetic resonance image‐guided transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Circulation 2003; 107: 132–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buecker A., Spuentrup E., Grabitz R., et al. Magnetic resonance‐guided placement of atrial septal closure device in animal model of patent foramen ovale. Circulation 2002; 106: 511–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arepally A., Karmarkar P. V., Weiss C., Rodriguez E. R., Lederman R. J., Atalar E. Magnetic resonance image‐guided trans‐septal puncture in a swine heart. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 463–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee S. T., Ganguly A., Daniel B. L., et al. MR‐guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation with use of a hybrid radiography/MR system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 227–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arepally A., Kamarkar P., Weiss C., Atalar E. Percutaneous MR‐Guided Transvascular Access of the Mesenteric Venous System‐Study in a Swine Model. Radiology 2005, (in press.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar