Coronary pressure measurements in post‐myocardial infarction patients

References

• White C. W., Wright C. B., Doty D. B., et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiological importance of a coronary stenosis?. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 819–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel R. A. Assessing stenosis significance by coronary angiography. Are the best variables good enough?. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 692–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emanuelsson H., Dohnal M., Lamm C., Tenerz L. Initial experiences with a miniaturized pressure transducer during coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 24: 137–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Bruyne B., Pijls N. H., Paulus W. J., Vantrimpont P. J., Sys S. U., Heyndrickx G. R. Trans‐stenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 119–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gould K. L., Kirkeeide R. L., Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 459–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould K. L., Lipscomb K., Hamilton G. W. Physiology basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33: 87–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIsaac H. C., Knudtson M. L., Robinson V. J., Manyari D. E. Is the residual translesional pressure gradient useful to predict regional myocardial perfusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty?. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 783–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodgson J. M., Reinert S., Most A. S., Williams D. O. Prediction of long‐term clinical outcome with final translesional pressure gradient during coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1986; 74: 563–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson R. J., King SB I. I. I., Fajman W. A., et al. Relation of coronary artery stenosis and pressure gradient to exercise‐induced ischemia before and after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 253–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pijls N. H., van Son J. A., Kirkeeide R. L., De Bruyne B., Gould K. L. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 86: 1354–67
   Google Scholar
• Pijls N. H., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92: 3183–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls N. H. J., De Bruyne B., Peels K., et al. Measurement of myocardial fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekamp C. E. E., Koolen J. J., Pijls N. H. J., Michel H. R., Bonnier H. J. R. M. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999; 99: 1015–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls N. H. J., Klauss V., Siebert U., et al. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow‐up: a multicenter registry. Circulation 2002; 105: 2950–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamuleau S. A. J., Meuwissen M., Koch K. T., et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 377–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leesar M. A., Abdul‐Baki T., Akkus N. I., Sharma A., Kannan T., Bolli R. Use of fractional flow reserve versus stress perfusion scintigraphy after unstable angina: Effect on duration of hospitalization, cost, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1115–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heyndrickx G. R., Amano J., Patrick T. A., et al. Effects of coronary artery reperfusion on regional myocardial blood flow and function in conscious baboons. Circulation 1985; 71: 1029–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suryapranata H., Zijlstra F., MacLeod D. C., et al. Predictive value of reactive hyperemic response on reperfusion on recovery of regional myocardial function after coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994; 89: 1109–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teiger E., Garot J., Aptecar E., et al. Coronary blood flow reserve and wall motion recovery in patients undergoing angioplasty for myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 285–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uren N. G., Crake T., Lefroy D. C., et al. Reduced coronary vasodilator function in infarcted and normal myocardium after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 222–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamita K., Akasaka T., Takagi T., et al. Effects of micro‐vascular dysfunction on myocardial fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 452–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muramatsu T., Tsukahara R., Ho M., et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve guidance for PCI in acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol 2002; 14: 657–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClish J. C., Ragosta M., Powers E. R., et al. Effect of acute myocardial infarction on the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of the severity of coronary artery narrowing. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 1102–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claeys M. J., Bosmans J. M., Hendrix J., et al. Reliability of fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with associated micro‐vascular dysfunction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54: 427–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takeuchi M., Himeno E., Sonoda S., Nakashima Y., Kuroiwa A. Measurement of myocardial fractional flow reserve during coronary angioplasty in patients with old myocardial infarction. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 42: 19–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Bruyne B., Pijls N. H. J., Bartunek J., et al. Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2001; 104: 157–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui Y., Chikamori T., Yanagisawa H., et al. Reliability of pressure‐derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in assessing coronary artery stenosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 699–702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Bruyne B., Bartunek J., Sys S. U., Pijls N. H., Heyndrickx G. R., Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1996; 94: 1842–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K., Sakanoue Y., Kobayashi Y., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability using coronary zero flow pressure after successful angioplasty in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. Heart 2003; 89: 71–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gavin J. B., Maxwell L., Edgar S. C. Macrovascular involvement in cardiac pathology. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1998; 30: 2531–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer W. J., Michael L. H., West M. S., et al. Neutrophil accumulation in ischemic canine myocardium. Insights into time course, distribution, and mechanism of localization during early reperfusion. Circulation 1991; 84: 400–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agati L. Micro‐vascular integrity after reperfusion therapy. Am Heart J 1999; 138((2 Pt 2))S76–8
   Google Scholar
• Kaul S., Ito H. Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Ischemia: Part II. Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Circulation 2004; 31, 109
   Google Scholar
• Gawaz M. Role of platelets in coronary thrombosis and reperfusion of ischemic myocardium. Cardiovasc Res 2004; 61: 498–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalis L. K., Katsouras C. S., Patsouras D., Naka K. K., Sideris D. A. Myocardial viability detection in post‐myocardial infarction patients by pressure wire techniques. Eur Heart J 2003; 24((Suppl))2233
   Google Scholar
• Cobb F. R., Bache R. J., Rivas F., et al. Local effects of acute cellular injury on regional myocardial blood flow. J Clin Invest 1976; 57: 1359–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar