7
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original article

Provisional stenting for multivessel PCI

, , , &
Pages 46-51 | Received 12 Nov 2004, Accepted 10 Jan 2005, Published online: 10 Jul 2009

References

  • Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496–501.
  • Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of-balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty-in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent-Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–95.
  • Peterson ED, Cowper PA, DeLong ER, et al. Acute and longterm-cost implications of coronary stenting. J Am Coll-Cardiol. 1999;33:1610–8.
  • Rodriguez A, Ayala F, Bernardi V, et al. Optimal coronary-balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary-stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1351–7.
  • Lansky AJ, Popma JJ, Massullo V, et al. Quantitative-angiographic analysis of stent restenosis in the Scripps-Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Intimal Proliferation Post-Stenting (SCRIPPS) Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:410–4.
  • Waksman R, White RL, Chan RC, et al. Intracoronary-gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence-in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2000;101:2165–71.
  • Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses JW, et al. Localized-intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the-recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med.-2001;344:250–6.
  • Cantor WJ, Hellkamp AS, Peterson ED, et al. Achieving-optimal results with standard balloon angioplasty: can baseline-and angiographic variables predict stent-like outcomes? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1883–90.
  • Schiele F, Meneveau N, Gilard M, et al. Intravascular-ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty compared with stent:-Immediate and 6-month results of the multicenter, randomized-balloon equivalent to stent study (BEST). Circulation.-2003;107:545–51.
  • Dangas G, Ambrose JA, Rehmann D, et al. Balloon-optimization versus stent study (BOSS): provisional stenting-and early recoil after balloon angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:957–61.
  • Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, et al. Use of a-morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:467–71.
  • Lansky AJ, Popma JJ. Quantitative angiography. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1999, pp 725–47.
  • Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, et al. Guidelines for-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of-the American College of Cardiology/American Heart-Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and-Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee-on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation. 1988;78:486–502.
  • Leborgne L, Cheneau E, Pichard A, et al. Effect of direct-stenting on clinical outcome in patients treated with-percutaneous coronary intervention on saphenous vein graft. Am Heart J. 2003;146:501–6.
  • Cohen DJ, Krumholz HM, Sukin CA, et al. In-hospital and-one-year economic outcomes after coronary stenting or-balloon angioplasty. Results from a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 1995;92:2480–7.
  • Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H, et al. Randomized-comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with-balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery-disease (Benestent II). Lancet. 1998;352:673–81.
  • Yock CA, Boothroyd DB, Owens DK, et al. Projected longterm-costs of coronary stenting in multivessel coronary-disease based on the experience of the Bypass Angioplasty-Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Am Heart J. 2000;140:556–64.
  • Park SW, Lee CW, Hong MK, et al. Randomized comparison-of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for-treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1785–9.
  • Weaver WD, Reisman MA, Griffin JJ, et al. Optimum-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared-with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:2199–203.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.