Discrepancy between morphologic and functional criteria of optimal stent deployment using intravascular ultrasound and pressure derived myocardial fractional flow reserve

References

• Pijls N. H., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92: 3183–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi A., Tsurumi Y., Ishii Y., Suzuki K., Kawana M., Kasanuki H. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure‐derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999; 100: 250–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama T., Hodgson J. M. Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: validation by direct coronary pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 48–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudra H., di Mario C., de Jaegere P. OPTICUS (OPTimization with ICUS to reduce stent restenosis) Study Investigators. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation 2001; 104: 1343–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jaegere P., Mudra H., Figulla H H. Intravascular ultrasound‐guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study). Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1122–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz R. S., Huber K. C., Murphy J. G. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 275–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farb A., Sangiorgi G., Carter A. J. Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 2002; 105: 2932–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savage M. P., Gischmann D. L., Douglas J. S. The dark side of high pressure stent deployment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1977; 29: 368
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez‐Aviles F., Alonso J. J., Duran J. M. High pressure increases late loss after coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 369
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C., Tseng D. Y., Squire J. C., Edelman E. R. Balloon‐artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. Circ Res 1999; 84: 378–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirschinger J., Kastrati A., Neumann F. J. Influence of balloon pressure during stent placement in native coronary arteries on early and late angiographic and clinical outcome: A randomized evaluation of high‐pressure inflation. Circulation 1999; 100: 918–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu R., Ueda M., Naruko T., Kojima A., Becker A. E. Neointimal tissue response at sites of coronary stenting in humans: macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Circulation 1998; 98: 224–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekamp C., Koolen J., Pijls N. H., Michels R., Bonnier H. Comparsion of Quantitative Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Coronary Pressure Measurement to Assess Optimum Stent Deployment. Circulation 1999; 99: 1015–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux J. T., Carroll J. D., Groves B. M. Optimal deployment of third‐generation stents: an intravascular ultrasound assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 142–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrints C. J., Claeys M. J., Bosmans J., Conraads V., Snoeck J. P. Effect of stenting on coronary flow velocity reserve: comparison of coil and tubular stents. Heart 1999; 82: 465–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon W. F., Luna J., Samady H. Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment. Circulation 2001; 104: 1917–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthys K., Carlier S., Segers P. In vitro study of FFR, QCA, and IVUS for the assessment of optimal stent deployment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54: 363–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katritsis D. G., Ioannidis J. P. A., Korovesis S. Comparison of Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound for the Assessment of Slotted‐Tube Stents. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2001; 52: 322–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls N. H., Klauss V., Siebert U. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Post‐Stent Registry Investigators. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow‐up: a multicenter registry. Circulation 2002; 105: 2950–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel J. J., Krams R., Schuurbiers J. C. Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after Wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2001; 103: 1740–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyne B., Hersbach F., Pijls N. H. Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but “Normal” coronary angiography. Circulation 2001; 104: 2401–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremias A., Whitbourn R. J., Filardo S. D. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine‐induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 2000; 140: 651–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyne B., Pijls N. H., Barbato E. Intracoronary and Intravenous Adenosine 5'‐Triphosphate, Adenosine, Papaverine, and Contrast Medium to Assess Fractional Flow Reserve in Humans. Circulation 2003; 107: 1877–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar