Enduring liminality: voting rights and Tibetan exiles in India

Bibliography

• “About 1450 Tibetans Registered to Vote in Nov 9 Himachal State Elections.” Tibetan Review, November 2, 2017. http://www.tibetanreview.net/about-1450-tibetans-registered-to-vote-in-nov-9-himachal-state-elections/
   Google Scholar
• Anand, D. “(Re)Imagining Nationalism: Identity and Representation in the Tibetan Diaspora of South Asia.” Contemporary South Asia 9, no. 3 (2000): 271–287. doi:10.1080/713658756.
   Google Scholar
• Brox, T. “Constructing a Tibetan Demos in Exile.” Citizenship Studies 16, no. 3–4 (2012): 451–467. doi:10.1080/13621025.2012.683258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Tibetan Administration. “Charter of the Tibetans-in-Exile.” Central Tibetan Administration, 199.1. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://tibet.net/about-cta/constitution/
   Google Scholar
• Dodin, T., and H. Rather. Imagining Tibet. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Election Commission of India. 2016. “Manual on Electoral Rolls.” Election Commission of India. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/HandBooks/Manual_ERoll_22112016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Election Commission of India. 2018. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://ecisveep.nic.in/voters/general-voters/
   Google Scholar
• Falcone, J., and T. Wangchuk. “‘We’re Not Home’: Tibetan Refugees in India in the Twenty-First Century.” India Review 7, no. 3 (2008): 164–199. doi:10.1080/14736480802261459.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S., and R. Wright. “Making and Remaking Tibetan Diasporic Identities.” Social and Cultural Geography 4, no. 2 (2003): 217–232. doi:10.1080/14649360309062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. Geopolitics Reframed: Security and Identity in Europe’s Eastern Enlargement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. “Liminality and Contested Europeanness: Conflicting Memory Politics in the Baltic Space.” In Identity and Foreign Policy: Baltic-Russian Relations in the Context of European Integration, edited by P. Ehin and E. Berg, 65–85. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. The Politics of Becoming European: A Study of Polish and Baltic Post-Cold War Security Imaginaries. New York and London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. “The Challenge of Liminality for International Relations Theory.” Review of International Studies 38, no. 2 (2012): 481–494. doi:10.1017/S0260210511000829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. “Citizens and Refugees: Constructing and Negotiating Tibetan Identities in Exile.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103, no. 4 (2013): 967–983. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.628245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. “Liminal Geopolitics: The Subjectivity and Spatiality of Diplomacy at the Margins.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42, no. 1 (2016): 139–152. doi:10.1111/tran.12156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. Rehearsing the State: The Political Practices of the Tibetan Government in Exile. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, C. “Refusal and the Gift of Citizenship.” Cultural Anthropology 31, no. 3 (2016): 334–341. doi:10.14506/ca31.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGranahan, C. “Refusal as Political Practice: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Tibetan Refugee Status.” American Ethnologist 45, no. 3 (2018): 367–379. doi:10.1111/amet.12671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Home Affairs. 2016. “Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3111.” December 14. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://mha1.nic.in/par2013/par2016-pdfs/rs-141216/3111.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Monlam, T. 2017. “Exile Tibetans Vote in Himachal Assembly Elections.” Phayul.Com. November 9. http://www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx?id=39778.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Commission, Central Tibetan Administration. Demographic Survey of Tibetans in Exile - 2009. Accessed October 20, 2018. http://tibet.net/about-cta/tibet-in-exile/
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B. “Liminal Identities and Processes of Domestication and Subversion in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 38, no. 2 (2012): 495–508. doi:10.1017/S0260210511000830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santianni, M. “The Movement for a Free Tibet: Cyberspace and Ambivalence of Cultural Translation.” In The Media of Diaspora: Mapping the Globe, edited by K. H. Karim, 189–203. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Siganporia, H., and F. G. Karioris. “Introduction: Rupture and Exile: Permanent Liminality in Spaces for Movement and Abandonment.” Culture Unbound 8, no. 1 (2016): 20–25. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.168120.
   Google Scholar
• Szakolczai, A. “Liminality and Experience: Structuring Transitory Situations and Transformative Events.” International Political Anthropology 2, no. 1 (2009): 141–172.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, B. “The Uses and Meanings of Liminality.” International Political Anthropology 2, no. 1 (2009): 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, New York: Cornell University Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• van Gennep, A. The Rites of Passage. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, E. “Exile Meets Homeland: Politics, Performance, and Authenticity in the Tibetan Diaspora.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25, no. 4 (2007): 648–667. doi:10.1068/d2805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar