Privatisation and foreign direct investment in 10 transition countries

References

• Acemoglu , D. and Johnson , S. 2005 . Unbundling institutions . Journal of political economy , 113 ( 5 ) : 949 – 995 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano , M. and Bond , S. 1991 . Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations . Review of economic studies , 58 : 277 – 298 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin , R. , François , J. and Portes , R. 1997 . The cost and benefits of Eastern enlargement: the impact on the EU and Central Europe . Economic policy , 12 ( 24 ) : 125 – 176 .
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett , D. 2000 . “ Foreign direct investment and privatisation policy: the causes and consequences of Hungary's route to capitalism ” . In Transitions to capitalism and democracy in Russia and Central Europe: achievements, problems, prospects , Edited by: Hancock , M. and Logue , J. Westport, CT and London : Greenwood, Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• Bevan , A. and Estrin , S. 2004 . The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies . Journal of comparative economics , 32 ( 4 ) : 775 – 787 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan , A. , Estrin , S. and Meyer , K. 2004 . Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies . International business review , 13 : 43 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Blundell , R. and Bond , S. 1998 . Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models . Journal of econometrics , 68 : 29 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , David J. and Earle , John S. 2006 . The productivity effects of privatisation: longitudinal estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia and Ukraine . Journal of political economy , 114 ( 1 ) : 61 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch , C. , Kokta , R. and Piazolo , D. 2003 . Foreign direct investment in Europe: is there a redirection from the South to the East? . Journal of comparative economics , 31 ( 1 ) : 94 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen , K. and Toubal , F. 2004 . Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European economies: a dynamic panel data analysis . Journal of comparative economics , 32 ( 1 ) : 3 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti , A. 2001 . The determinants of foreign direct investment: sensitivity analysis of cross-country regressions . Kyklos , 54 : 89 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng , L. and Kwan , Y. 2000 . What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience . Journal of international economics , 51 : 379 – 400 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euromoney Magazine, London, various issues.
   Google Scholar
• European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Transition Report. London: EBRD, various issues.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat, 2002. European Union foreign direct investment yearbook 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Filatotchev , I. 2003 . Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies . Journal of world business , 38 ( 4 ) : 331 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev , I. , Wright , M. and Bleaney , M. 1999 . Privatisation, insider control and managerial entrenchment in Russia . Economics of transition , 7 ( 2 ) : 481 – 504 .
   Google Scholar
• Frydman , R. 1999 . When does privatisation work? The impact of private ownership on corporate performance in the transition economies . Quarterly journal of economics , 114 ( 4 ) : 1153 – 1191 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibaldi , P. 2001 . What moves capital to transition economies? . IMF staff papers , 48 : 109 – 145 .
   Google Scholar
• Gouret , F. 2007 . Privatization and output behavior during the transition: methods matter! . Journal of comparative economics , 35 : 3 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D. and Pain, N., 1998. The diffusion of innovations in Central and Eastern Europe: a study of the determinants and impact of foreign direct investment. National Institute of Economic and Social Research discussion paper No. 173.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office, Handbook of Labour Statistics, Geneva, various issues.
   Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, Y. and Campos, N., 2003. Why does FDI go where it goes? New evidence from the transition countries. William Davidson Institute working paper No. 573.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, J. and Maskus, K., 2001. General-equilibrium approaches to the multinational firm: a review of theory and evidence. NBER working paper No. 8334.
   Google Scholar
• Merlevede , B. and Schoors , K. 2007 . On the speed of economic reform: tale of the tortoise and the hare – evidence from transition countries . Journal of economic policy reform , 10 ( 1 ) : 29 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, 2001. International direct investment statistics yearbook: 1980–2000 – Edition 2001, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Resmini , L. 2000 . The determinants of foreign direct investment in the CEECs – new evidence from sectoral patterns . Economics of transition , 8 ( 3 ) : 665 – 689 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Audit Office Hungary, 2001. Privatisation in Hungary 1990–2000, presented to the INTOSAI working group on the audit of privatisation, Budapest, June.
   Google Scholar
• Warzynski , F. 2003 . Managerial change, competition, and privatisation in Ukraine . Journal of comparative economics , 31 ( 2 ) : 297 – 314 .
   Google Scholar
• Windmeijer, F., 2000. A finite sample correction for the variance of two-step GMM estimators, Institute for Fiscal Studies working paper W/00/19.
   Google Scholar