Leadership in high-level forums on energy governance: China and Russia compared

References

• Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 30(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E. (2017). Real world headwinds for Trump climate change policy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73(6), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1388673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. (2020). The new spheres of influence: Sharing the globe with other great powers. Foreign Affairs, 99(2), 30–40.  https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-02-10/new-spheres-influence
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., & Alexieva, A. (2012). Continuity and change in Russia’s climate negotiations position and strategy. Climate Policy, 12(5), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.691227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpino, B., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2020). Democracy and political trust before and after the great recession 2008: The European Union and the United Nations. Social Indicators Research, 148(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02204-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M., & Kotkin, S. (2014). Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. V. (2015). Russia’s gas export reorientation from West to East: Economic and political considerations. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 8(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwu037
   Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. V., & Goldthau, A. (2015). Between a rock and a hard place: International market dynamics, domestic politics and Gazprom’s strategy (European University Institute 2015/22). European University Institute. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rscrsceui/2015_2f22.htm
   Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. V., & Locatelli, C. (2015). State and markets in Russia’s hydrocarbon sectors: Domestic specificities and interrelations with the West. In Belyi, A.V. and Talus, K. (Eds.), States and markets in hydrocarbon sectors (pp. 103–121). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. V., & Talus, K. (2015). States and Markets in Hydrocarbon Sectors. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BP. (2020). Statistical review of world energy (69th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Brenton, A. (2013). ‘Great powers’ in climate politics. Climate Policy, 13(5), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.774632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demchuk, A. L., Mišić, M., Obydenkova, A., & Tosun, J. (2021). Environmental conflict management: A comparative cross-cultural perspective of China and Russia. Post-Communist Economies, 1–23. forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domorenok, E., Acconcia, G., Bendlin, L., & Campillo, X. R. (2020). Experiments in EU climate governance: The unfulfilled potential of the Covenant of Mayors. Global Environmental Politics, 20(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, L. (2017). Bound to lead? Rethinking China’s role after Paris in UNFCCC negotiations. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 15(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2017.1286144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Democracy and climate change policies: Is history important? Ecological Economics, 95(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., Damania, R., & Gates, S. (2005). Environmentalism, democracy, and pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Wollscheid, J. R. (2007). Democratic institutions versus autocratic regimes: The case of environmental policy. Public Choice, 130(34), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9093-1
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., & Nakicenovic, N. (2014). Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2020). Horses for courses. The roles of IPE and global public policy in global energy research. Policy and Society, 1–17. forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1864100
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2017). The strength of weakness: Pseudo-clubs in the climate regime. Climatic Change, 144(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1481-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haini, H. (2020). The evolution of China’s modern economy and its implications on future growth. Post-Communist Economies, 1–25. forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heal, G., & Kunreuther, H. (2017). An alternative framework for negotiating climate policies. Climatic Change, 144(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2043-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Mitrova, T. (2020). Implications of the global energy transition on Russia. In S. Tagliapietra & M. Hafner (Eds.), Lecture notes in energy. The geopolitics of the global energy transition (Vol. 73, pp. 93–114). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2_5
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Moe, A. (2016). Gazprom’s LNG offensive: A demonstration of monopoly strength or impetus for Russian gas sector reform? Post-Communist Economies, 28(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1203206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, L. A., & Sundstrom, L. M. (2007). Russia and the Kyoto Protocol: Seeking an alignment of interests and image. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, I., & Kerr, O. (2017). The Paris agreement: China’s ‘New Normal’ role in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 17(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1228521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2015). Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.927387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., Sælen, H., & Underdal, A. (2016). Climate change mitigation: A role for climate clubs? Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.20
   Google Scholar
• Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., Sælen, H., & Underdal, A. (2019). The club approach: A gateway to effective climate co-operation? British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1071–1096. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izotov, V. S., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2020). Geopolitical games in Eurasian regionalism: Ideational interactions and regional international organisations. Post-Communist Economies, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793584
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Schoenefeld, J., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018). Governing climate change polycentrically. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 3–26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.002
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J. J., Tosun, J., Forster, J., & Boasson, E. L. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jotzo, F., Depledge, J., & Winkler, H. (2018). US and international climate policy under President Trump. Climate Policy, 18(7), 813–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1490051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korppoo, A., & Kokorin, A. (2017). Russia’s 2020 GHG emissions target: Emission trends and implementation. Climate Policy, 17(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, T., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016b). Authoritarian and democratic diffusion in post-communist regions. Comparative Political Studies, 49(12), 1599–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, T., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016a). Appropriation and subversion. World Politics, 68(2), 229–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanshina, T. A., Laitner, J. A., Potashnikov, V. Y., & Barinova, V. A. (2018). The slow expansion of renewable energy in Russia: Competitiveness and regulation issues. Energy Policy, 120(1), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.052 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.052
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., Jiang, H., Sotnyk, I., Kubatko, O., & Almashaqbeh, Y. A., I. (2020). The CO2 emissions drivers of post-communist economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Atmosphere, 11(9), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11091019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2013). Communism or communists? Soviet legacies and corruption in transition economies. Economics Letters, 119(1), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2014). Governance of commons in a large nondemocratic country: The case of forestry in the Russian Federation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 44(2), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018a). Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: The Eurasian Economic Union and Russian foreign policy. International Affairs, 94(5), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018b). Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: The Eurasian economic Union and Russian foreign policy. International Affairs, 94(5), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., & Wurzel, R. K. W. (2018). Leadership and Pioneership. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 135–151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.009
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2007). Qualitative methodology and comparative politics. Comparative Political Studies, 40(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006296345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarov, I., Chen, H., & Paltsev, S. (2020). Impacts of climate change policies worldwide on the Russian economy. Climate Policy, 20(10), 1242–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1781047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martus, E. (2019). Russian industry responses to climate change: The case of the metals and mining sector. Climate Policy, 19(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1448254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, M., & Rodríguez, M. (2014). Autocracies and international cooperation. International Studies Quarterly, 58(3), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidan, M. (2020). China: Climate leader and villain. In S. Tagliapietra & M. Hafner (Eds.), Lecture notes in energy. The geopolitics of the global energy transition (Vol. 73, pp. 75–91). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Mitrova, T., & Melnikov, Y. (2019). Energy transition in Russia. Energy Transitions, 3(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41825-019-00016-8
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarov, Z., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2020). Democratization and firm innovation: Evidence from European and Central Asian post-Communist States. Post-Communist Economies, 32(7), 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1745565
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obama, B. (2017). The irreversible momentum of clean energy. Science (New York, N.Y.), 355(6321), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., Nazarov, Z., & Salahodjaev, R. (2016). The process of deforestation in weak democracies and the role of Intelligence. Environmental Research, 148(1), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., & Salahodjaev, R. (2016). Intelligence, democracy, and international environmental commitment. Environmental Research, 147(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A. V. (2012). Democratization at the grassroots: The European Union’s external impact. Democratization, 19(2), 230–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.576851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A. V., & Arpino, B. (2018). Corruption and trust in the European Union and National Institutions: Changes over the great recession across European States. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(3), 594–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2012). Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: Must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Economic Theory, 49(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0558-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, R. A. (1995). Freedom and the environment. Journal of Democracy, 6(3), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2017). Communism’s shadow: Historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shandra, J. M. (2007). The world polity and deforestation. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715207072157
   Google Scholar
• Sprinz, D. F., Sælen, H., Underdal, A., & Hovi, J. (2018). The effectiveness of climate clubs under Donald Trump. Climate Policy, 18(7), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1410090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. W. (2011). Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy (1. publ). Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10469103 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793943
   Google Scholar
• Tarasova, E. (2018). (Non-) alternative energy transitions: Examining neoliberal rationality in official nuclear energy discourses of Russia and Poland. Energy Research & Social Science, 41(1), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, P. (2017). Leaders and laggards: Climate policy ambition in developed states. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2011). When the grace period is over: Assessing the new Member States’ compliance with EU requirements for oil stockholding. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7156–7164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., & Schulze, K. (2015). Building the EU’s energy policy Agenda: An introduction. In J. Tosun, S. Biesenbender, & K. Schulze (Eds.), Lecture notes in energy: Vol. 28. Energy policy making in the EU: Building the agenda (Vol. 28, pp. 1–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_1
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Rinscheid, A. (2021). The clean energy ministerial: Motivation for and policy consequences of membership. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120942303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen, N. (2010). A great ecological power in global climate policy? Framing climate change as a policy problem in Russian public discussion. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903574459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen, V.-P., & Tynkkynen, N. (2018). Climate denial revisited: (Re)contextualising Russian public discourse on climate change during putin 2.0. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(7), 1103–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1472218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Graaf, T. (2013). Fragmentation in global energy governance: Explaining the creation of IRENA. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, D. G. (2015). The case for climate clubs. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development/World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Weischer, L., Morgan, J., & Patel, M. (2012). Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change? Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12007
   Google Scholar
• Widerberg, O., & Stenson, D. E. (2013). Climate clubs and the UNFCCC. Stockholm: FORES.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F., & Martus, E. (2020). Contested environmentalism: The politics of waste in China and Russia. Environmental Politics, 12(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1816367
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Jin, W., Jiang, H., Xie, Q., Shen, W., & Han, W. (2017). Car ownership policies in China: Preferences of residents and influence on the choice of electric cars. Transport Policy, 58(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B. (2019). Climate clubs and global decarbonization: A comparison of the APP and the CEM. EGL Working Paper 20191. Toronto. Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar