Strategies and challenges of sustainable development in Eurasia

References

• Whitehead, L. (ed.). (1996). International dimension of democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M., and Kotkin, S. (eds.). (2014). Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T., Hall, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2021). Sustainable development agendas of regional international organizations: The European Bank of reconstruction and development and the Eurasian development bank. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–13. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1979412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, T. (2010). Constructing a framework of authoritarian diffusion: Concepts, dynamics, and future research. International Studies Perspective, 11(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., & Tuta, I. A. (2014). Transnational networks and paths to EU environmental compliance: Evidence from new member states. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpino, B., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2020). Democracy and political trust before and after the great recession 2008: The European Union and the United Nations. Social Indicators Research, 148(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02204-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of intergovernmental organizations in international environmental politics. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demchuk, A. L., Mišić, M., Obydenkova, A., & Tosun, J. (2021). Environmental conflict management: A comparative cross-cultural perspective of China and Russia. Post-Communist Economies, 1–23. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dininio, P., & Orttung, R. (2005). Explaining patterns of corruption in the Russian regions. World Politics, 57(4), 500–529. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djalilov, K., & Hartwell, C. (2021). Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 1–23. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1965359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Mohanty, A. (2021). COVID-19 regulations, political institutions, and the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00628-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Democracy and climate change policies: Is history important? Ecological Economics, 95, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Wollscheid, J. R. (2007). Democratic institutions versus autocratic regimes: The case of environmental policy. Public Choice, 130(3–4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutner, T. (2002). Banking on the environment: Multilateral development banks and their environmental performance in central and Eastern Europe. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. G. F., Lenz, T., & Obydenkova, A. (2021). Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: Social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU. Post-Communist Economies, 1–26. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanaček, K., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2021). Nuclear supply chain and environmental justice struggles in Soviet and Post-Soviet countries. Post-Communist Economies, 1–29. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, L. A., & McIntosh Sundstrom, L. (2007). Russia and the Kyoto protocol: Seeking an alignment of interests and image. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izotov, V. S., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2021). Geopolitical games in Eurasian regionalism: Ideational interactions and regional international organisations. Post-Communist Economies, 33(2–3), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneuer, M., & Demmelhuber, T. (2016). Gravity centers of authoritarian rule: A conceptual approach. Democratization, 23(5), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1018898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochtcheeva, L. V. (2021). Foreign policy, national interests, and environmental positioning: Russia’s post Paris climate change actions, discourse, and engagement. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–13. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1968912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopstein, J., & Reilly, D. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics, 53(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100009369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, T. V., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016b). Appropriation and subversion. World Politics, 68(2), 229–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, T., Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2016a). Authoritarian and democratic diffusion in post-communist regions. Comparative Political Studies, 49(12), 1599–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018a). Understanding authoritarian regionalism. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018b). Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: The Eurasian economic union and Russian foreign policy. International Affairs, 94(5), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2014). Governance of commons in a large nondemocratic country: The case of forestry in the Russian federation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 44(2), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2019). Inequality and historical legacies: Evidence from post-communist regions. Post-Communist Economies, 31(6), 699–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1607440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2020). Proletarian internationalism in action? Communist legacies and attitudes towards migrants in Russia. Problems of Post-Communism, 67(4–5), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1640068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mišić, M., & Obydenkova, A. (2021). Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia. Post-Communist Economies, 1–30. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarov, Z., & Obydenkova, A. (2020). Democratization and firm innovation: Evidence from the European and Central Asian post-communist states. Post-Communist Economies, 32(7), 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1745565
   Google Scholar
• Nazarov, Z., & Obydenkova, A. (2021a). Public health, democracy, and transition: Global evidence and post-communism. Social Indicators Research. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02770-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarov, Z., & Obydenkova, A. (2021b). Environmental challenges and political regime transition: The role of historical legacies and the European Union in Eurasia. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–14. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1995437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A. V., & Salahodjaev, R. (2017). Climate change policies: The role of democracy and social cognitive capital. Environmental Research, 157, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., & Libman, A. (2012). The impact of external factors on regime transition: Lessons from the Russian regions. Post-Soviet Affairs, 28(3), 346–401. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.28.3.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., & Libman, A. (2015). The survival of post-communist corruption in contemporary Russia: The influence of historical legacies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(4), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2014.931683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., Rodrigues Vieira, V. G., & Tosun, J. (2021). The impact of new actors in global environmental politics: The European bank for reconstruction and development meets China. Post-Communist Economies. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., & Salahodjaev, R. (2016). Intelligence, democracy, and international environmental commitment. Environmental Research, 147(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., & Swenden, W. (2013). Autocracy-sustaining versus democratic federalism: Explaining the divergent trajectories of territorial politics in Russia and Western Europe. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.763733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A. (2008). Regime transition in the regions of Russia: The freedom of mass media: Transnational impact on sub-national democratization? European Journal of Political Research, 47(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. (2005). Democracy from above? Regional organizations and democratization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poberezhskaya, M., & Bychkova, A. (2021). Kazakhstan’s climate change policy: Reflecting national strength, green economy aspirations and international agenda. Post-Communist Economies, 1–22. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2017). Communism's shadow: Historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Salahodjaev, R., & Isaeva, A. (2021). Post-Soviet states and CO2 emissions: The role of foreign direct investment. Post-Communist Economies, 1–22. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1965360
   Google Scholar
• Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., Mahmood, H., & Arouri, M. (2013). Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Economic Modelling, 35, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. , Börzel, T. A. (2014). Introduction to Presidential Issue: The Politics of International Diffusion—A Symposium. International Studies Review, 16(2), 173–187. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24032870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanov, I. A., & Makarov, I. A. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions regulation in fossil fuels exporting countries: Opportunities and challenges for Russia. Post-Communist Economies, 1–28. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943918
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Alex, L. (2016). Carbon trading in China: Environmental discourse and politics. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_r_00372
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. (2010). Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the World, 1972–2006. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Rinscheid, A. (2021). The clean energy ministerial: Motivation for and policy consequences of membership. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120942303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Shyrokykh, K. (2021). Leadership in high-level forums on energy governance: China and Russia compared. Post-Communist Economies, 1–24. Accessed on 3 December, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable, S. (2011). Red to green: Environmental activism in post-soviet Russia. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 154–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_r_00076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2009). How foreign aid can foster democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J. (2015). Entering the mainstream: An evolution in China’s climate diplomacy. China Dialogue. https://chinadialogue.net/en/climate/8369-entering-the-mainstream-an-evolution-in-china-s-climate-diplomacy/
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Fan, F., & Pak, S. D. (2019). Network analysis of actors and policy keywords for sustainable environmental governance: Focusing on Chinese environmental policy. Sustainability, 11(15), 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., & Xue-Feng, J. (2019). The effect of environmental policy on Chinese firm’s green productivity and shadow price: A metafrontier input distance function approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar