On literary bullshit: discursive wrongdoing and modernity in Fray Gerundio de Campazas

References

• Aradra Sánchez, Rosa María. 1999. “Las formas de la teoría literaria del siglo XVIII: El Fray Gerundio como retórica novelada.” Revista de Literatura 61 (121): 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Edited by G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babbitt, Paul. 2013. “Taking Bulls**t Seriously.” Chronicle of Higher Education 60 (12): b4–b5.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Max. 1983. The Prevalence of Humbug and Other Essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, Sissela. 1999. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Briesemeister, Dietrich. 1986. “La aventura de leer en Fray Gerundio.” Iberoromania: Zeitschrift fur die Iberoromanischen Sprachen und Literaturen in Europa und Amerika/Revista Dedica 23: 125–148.
   Google Scholar
• Cañigral Cortés, Luis de. 1996. “‘Ahí está Menckenio … que no me dejará mentir’: Algunas fuentes latinas de Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Castilla: Estudios de Literatura 21: 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, Stanley. 2002. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Sham, Jorge. 1990. “Hacia una lectura de la estrategia paratextual del Fray Gerundio de Campazas: La fuerza centrípeta del prólogo autorial.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 16 (2): 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1991. “La teoría del paratexto y el Fray Gerundio de Campazas: La puesta en escena de una retórica de lo liminar.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 17 (1–2): 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1992. “Recepción literaria y contrato satírico: Un acercamiento a la polémica desatada por el Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Káñina: Revista de Artes y Letras de la Universidad de Costa Rica 16 (1): 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1994. “El intertexto cervantino en un texto dieciochesco español: El Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Káñina: Revista de Artes y Letras de la Universidad de Costa Rica 18 (2): 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Sham, Jorge.. 1995. “Perfecit y denegación final del contrato historiográfico en el Fray Gerundio de Campazas.” Revista de Filologia y Linguistica de la Universidad de Costa Rica 21 (2): 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Sham, Jorge.. 2002. “La sátira del letrado en el siglo XVIII español: ¿Cliché o sociotipo?” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 25 (2): 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2006. “Deeper into Bullshit.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 117–135. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, Cornelis. 2006. “The Importance of Being Earnest: A Pragmatic Approach to Bullshitting.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 99–113. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, Philip, and John D. Schaeffer. 2008. “A Kind Word for Bullshit: The Problem of Academic Writing.” College Composition and Communication 59 (3): 372–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Mark. 2006. “The Republic of Bullshit: On the Dumbing-up of Democracy.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 185–202. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2001. Dits et écrits, 1954–1988. 4th ed., 2 vols. Edited by François Ewald and Daniel Defert. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry G. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Rebecca. 1994. “Fray Gerundio and Luxury: The Rococo Aesthetics of Feminized Form.” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 17 (2): 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Rebecca.. 2002. Seduction and Sacrilege: Rhetorical Power in Fray Gerundio de Campazas. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle, Gary L., and George A. Reisch, eds. 2006. Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Helman, Edith F. 1955. “Padre Isla and Goya.” Hispania 38 (2): 150–158. doi: 10.2307/335806
   Google Scholar
• Iarocci, Michael. 2006. Properties of Modernity: Romantic Spain, Modern Europe, and the Legacies of Empire. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isla, José Francisco. 1995. Fray Gerundio de Campazas, alias Zotes. Edited by Enrique Rodríguez Cepeda. Madrid: Cátedra.
   Google Scholar
• James, Aaron J. 2014. Assholes: A Theory. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jurado, José. 1989. “El Fray Gerundio y la oratoria sagrada barroca.” Edad de Oro 8: 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “An Answer to the Question: What is the Enlightenment?” In Practical Philosophy, edited by Mary J. Gregor, 11–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbrough, Scott. 2006. “On Letting It Slide.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 3–18. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, Philippe. 1989. On Autobiography. Translated by Katherine Leary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Fernández, José Enrique. 1999. “Burla, sátira y humor en Fray Gerundio de Campazas (huellas de la comicidad carnavalesca).” Epos: Revista de Filología 15: 175–197.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. 2009. 2nd ed. (CD-ROM), s.v. “fiction”.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Joe L. 1973. “‘La juventud triunfante’ and the Origins of Padre Isla’s Satire.” Hispania 56 (1): 75–80. doi: 10.2307/339040
   Google Scholar
• Penny, Laura. 2005. Your Call is Important to Us: The Truth about Bullshit. New York: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Magallón, Jesús. 2002. Construyendo la modernidad: la cultura española en el tiempo de los Novatores (1675–1725). Madrid: CSIC.
   Google Scholar
• Preti, Consuelo. 2006. “A Defense of Common Sense.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 19–32. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, George A. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Bullshit, Intelligently Designed.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 33–47. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Alan. 2006. “Performing Bullshit and the Post-sincere Condition.” In Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time, edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch, 83–97. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Santiáñez, Nil. 2002. Investigaciones literarias: Modernidad, historia de la literatura y modernismos. Barcelona: Crítica.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, Ludger. 2005. “Diálogo de los prólogos: La Historia del famoso predicador Fray Gerundio de Campazas de José Francisco de Isla y el Quijote de Miguel de Cervantes.” In Literatura-Cultura-Media-Lengua: Nuevos planteamientos de la investigación del siglo XVIII en España e Hispanoamérica, edited by Christian von Tschilschke and Andreas Gelz, 177–186. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sebold, Russell P. 1958. “Naturalistic Tendencies and the Descent of the Hero in Isla’s Fray Gerundio.” Hispania 41 (3): 308–314. doi: 10.2307/334814
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Susan M. 1995. “El morrión del padre Isla: La dedicatoria y el prólogo de Fray Gerundio.” Dieciocho: Hispanic Enlightenment 18 (1): 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar