Expert, healer, reassurer, hero and prophet: framing genetics and medical scientists in television news

References

• Allan, S., 2002. Media, Risk and Science. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., 2002. In search of the holy grail: media discourse and the new human genetics, New Genetics and Society 21 (2002), pp. 327–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., et al., 2005. The framing of nanotechnologies in the British press, Science Communication 27 (2) (2005), pp. 200–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., 1998. The medicalisation of science news—from the ‘rocket-scalpel’ to the ‘gene-meteorite’ complex, Social Science Information 37 (1998), pp. 731–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., 2002. Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis, Public Understanding of Science 1 (2002), pp. 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., 2001. "Organising/disorganising the breakthrough motif: Dolly the cloned ewe meets Astrid the hybrid pig". In: Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A., eds. Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2001. pp. 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, P., 1999. Use of expertise: sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news, Public Understanding of Science 8 (1999), pp. 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, J., 1995. Television Form and Public Address. London: Arnold; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J., Bauer, M., and Gaskell, G., 1998. Durant, J., Bauer, M., and Gaskell, G., eds. Biotechnology in the Public Sphere. London: Science Museum; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, E., 1992. Framing science and technology in the Canadian press, Public Understanding of Science 1 (1992), pp. 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., 2000. Information, storytelling and attractions: TV journalism in three modes of communication, Media, Culture & Society 22 (2000), pp. 465–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M., 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication 43 (1993), pp. 51–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer, 2001. Europeans, Science and Technology. Bryssels: Directorate-General for Press and Communication, European Commission; 2001, available at <http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/press/2001/pr0612en-report.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Mass Media, 2004. Culture and the Media 2004: 2. Helsinki: Statistics Finland; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J., 1989. Television Culture. London and New York: Methuen; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., and Lasch, K., 1983. "The political culture of welfare policy". In: Spiro, S. E., ed. Evaluating the Welfare State. New York: Academic Press; 1983. pp. 397–415.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., and Bauer, M., 2001. Gaskell, G., and Bauer, M., eds. Biotechnology 1996–2000, the Years of Controversy. London: Science Museum; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T., 1980. The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., and Dickinson, R., 1992. Science coverage in the British mass media, Communications 17 (1992), pp. 365–77.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., and van Langenhove, L., 1991. Varieties of positioning, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (1991), pp. 393–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R., Brockmeier, J., and Mühlhäusler, P., 1999. Greenspeak. A Study of Environmental Discourse. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, Heikki, 1999. From Companions to Competitors. The Changing Broadcasting Markets and Television Programming in Finland. Tampere: University of Tampere; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hellsten, I., 2003. Promises of a healthier future: medical genetics on Finnish television news, 1987–2000, Nordicom Information 24 (1–2) (2003), pp. 31–7.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, A., 1988. Doctoring the Media. London: Routledge; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kauhanen, E. A., 1997. The River of Ink. Helsinki: University of Helsinki; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusi, H., 2001. Finland—a European leader in biotechnology, Kemia-Kemi 28 (2001), pp. 32–7.
   Google Scholar
• LaFollette, M., 1990. Making Science of Our Own. Public Images of Science 1910–1955. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., and Väliverronen, E., 1999. "In science and technology we trust: on the public understanding of science in Finland". In: Miettinen, R., ed. Biotechnology and Public Understanding of Science. Helsinki: The Academy of Finland; 1999. pp. 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., 1996. An uneasy relationship: the tensions between medicine and the media, Lancet 347 (1996), pp. 1600–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., and Lindee, S., 1995. The DNA-Mystique. The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Norio, R., 2003. The Finnish disease heritage I–III, Human Genetics 112 (5–6) (2003), pp. 470–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A, 2001. Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media, Social Science & Medicine 52 (2001), pp. 1255–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridell, S., 1998. Tolkullistamisen politiikka. Televisiouutisten vastaantotto kriittisestä genrenäkökulmasta. University of Tampere; 1998, (Politics of sense-making: the reception of the TV news from a critical genre perspective), Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 617.
   Google Scholar
• Rusanen, T., 2002. Challenging the risk society: the case of Finland, Science Communication 24 (2002), pp. 198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusanen, T., von Wright, A., and Rusanen, M., 1998. Durant, J., Bauer, M., and Gaskell, G., eds. Biotechnology in the Public Sphere. London: Science Museum; 1998. pp. 43–50, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Rusanen, T., von Wright, A., and Rusanen, M., 2001. "Biotechnology in Finland". In: Gaskell, G., and Bauer, M., eds. Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy. London: Science Museum; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Schienstock, G., and Tulkki, P., 2001. The Fourth Pillar. An assessment of the situation of the Finnish biotechnology, Small Business Economics 17 (1/2) (2001), pp. 105–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, J., and Väliverronen, E., 2003. Visualising biodiversity: the role of photographs in environmental discourse, Science as Culture 12 (1) (2003), pp. 59–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedebarometri, 2001. Tutkimus suomalaisten suhtautumisesta tieteeseen ja tieteellis-tekniseen kehitykseen (Science Barometer: The Attitudes towards Science and Technology in Finland). Helsinki: Tieteen tiedotus; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Väliverronen, E., 2004. Stories of the ‘medicine cow’: representations of future promises in media discourse, Public Understanding of Science 13 (2004), pp. 363–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väliverronen, E., and Hellsten, I., 2002. From ‘burning library’ to ‘green medicine’. The role of metaphors in communicating biodiversity, Science Communication 24 (2) (2002), pp. 229–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., 1998. Imagenation. Popular Images of Genetics. New York: New York University Press; 1998. pp. 171–80.
   Google Scholar