Bioethics, politics and the moral economy of human embryonic stem cell science: the case of the European Union's Sixth Framework Programme

References

• Asad, T., 1973. Asad, T., ed. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T., 1979. Anthropology and the analysis of ideology, Man 14 (1979), pp. 607–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bosk, C. L., 1999. Professional ethicist available: logical, secular, friendly, Daedelus 128 (4) (1999), pp. 47–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channelnewsasia, 2004. French parliament bans human cloning, (2004), available at www.channelnewsasiacom/stories/afp_world/view/94729/1/.html. (accessed 21 June 2006).
   Google Scholar
• EGE, 1998a. Ethical Aspects of Human Tissue Banking (1998a), Opinion no. 11 to the European Commission, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/european_group_ethics/docs/avis11_en.pdf (accessed 22 June 2006).
   Google Scholar
• EGE, 2000. Ethical Aspects of Human Stem Cell Research and Use (2000), Opinion no. 15 to the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EGE, 2002. Ethical Aspects of Patenting Inventions Involving Human Stem Cells (2002), Opinion no. 16 to the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2002. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, (2002), procurement, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, COM(2002)319 final, 19/6/02.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2003a. Life Sciences and Biotechnology—a Strategy for Europe. Progress Report and Future Orientations (2003a), COM(2003)96 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2003b. Report on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (2003b), SEC(2003)441, 3 April.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2003c. EU Funding and the Bio-ethics of Stem-cell Research, (2003c), Inter-institutional seminar, news report 25 April, available at http//:www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade2?PUBREF = //EP//TE…/EN&LEVEL = 2&NAV= (accessed 7 June 2006).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2004. Work programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’, (2004), Priority 1: Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health, Commission Decision C(2004)2002, 10 June.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2005. Social Values, Science and Technology (2005), Special Eurobarometer, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf (accessed 23 May 2006).
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2002. Council Decision 2002/834/EC adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ (2002–06), Official Journal (2002), pp. 1–43, L294, 29/10/02.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 1989. Resolution on the ethical and legal problems of genetic engineering, Official Journal (1989), p. 171, C 096, 17/4/1989.
   Google Scholar
• Europea Parliament, 1993. Resolution on the cloning of the human embryo, Official Journal (1993), p. 224, C 315, 22/11/1993.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 1997. Resolution on the cloning of human beings, Official Journal (1997), p. 92, C 115, 14/4/1997.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 1998. Resolution on the cloning of human beings, Official Journal (1998), p. 164, C 034, 2/2/1998.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2000. Resolution on human cloning, (2000), PE T5-0375/2000.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2001a. Proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision concerning the multiannual framework programme 2002–06 of the European Community for research, (2001a), technological development and demonstration activities aimed at contributing towards the creation of the European Research Area, COM(2001)94, 14 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2001b. "Debates of the European Parliament, sitting of 29th November 2001". Human genetics; 2001b.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2003a. European Parliament Resolution on the proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision 2002/834/EC on the specific programme for research, (2003a), technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European research area’ (2002–06), COM(2003)390, 19 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2003b. Report on the Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Setting Standards of Quality and Safety for the Donation, Procurement, Testing, Processing, Storage, and Distribution of Human Tissues and Cells (2003b), A5-0103/2003, Final.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2003c. Amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, storage, and distribution of human tissues and cells (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 (2) of the EC Treaty)/COM/2003/0340final-COD 2002/0128, (2003c), available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexUriServ/LexUriSer.do?uri = CELEX:52003PC0340: EN:HTML (accessed 8 November 2007).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the European Council, 2002. Decision 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and Council concerning the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002–06), Official Journal (2002), L232, 29/8/02.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the European Council, 2004. Directive 2003/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, Official Journal (2004), L102, 31/03/04.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, S., 2005. Live and let…? Measuring and explaining the strictness of embryo research laws in 21 countries. Presented at Paper presented at the Third European Consortium for Political Research Conference. Budapest, 8–10, September, Panel 3–7: The Regulation of the Life Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gearhart, J. D., 1998. New potential for human embryonic stem cells, Science 282 (1998), pp. 1061–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Githens, M., 1996. "Reproductive rights and the struggle with change in Eastern Europe". In: Githens, M., and McBride, Stetson D., eds. Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective. London: Routledge; 1996. pp. 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H., 2003. Human embryonic stem cells, cloning, and the transformation of biopolitics, Biotechnology Between Commerce and Civil Society (2003), pp. 239–65, (Transaction Books).
   Google Scholar
• Gough, K., 1968. New proposals for anthropologists, Current Anthropology 9 (1968), pp. 403–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. P., and Johnson, S. M., 2005. Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: change or continuity?, Sociology of Religion (2005), available at www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0SOR/is_2_66/ai_n14817990 (accessed 28 May 2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. D., 1994. Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America's Culture War. New York: The Free Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Knoppers, B. M., and Chadwick, R., 1994. The Human Genome Project: under an international ethical microscope, Science 265 (1994), pp. 2035–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoppers, B. M., and Chadwick, R., 2005. Human genetics research: emerging trends in ethics, Nature Reviews Genetics 6 (2005), pp. 75–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, J., 2004. How sociology can save bioethics … maybe, Sociology of Health and Illness 25 (7) (2004), pp. 875–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, D., 2001. Whither Hunter's culture war? Shifts in evangelical morality 1988–1998, Sociology of Religion 62 (2001), pp. 149–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M., 2002. Religion and public policy: institutional, cultural and political impact on the shaping of abortion policies in western democracies, Comparative Political Studies 35 (2) (2002), pp. 221–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M., 1997. The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Research Europe, 2003. EU stem cell guidelines raise supply issues, Research Europe (2003), p. 4, 31 July.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B., and Jones, M., 2005. Biobanks and bioethics: the politics of legitimation, Journal of European Public Policy 12 (4) (2005), pp. 710–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spallone, P., 1999. How the pre-embryo got its spots. Presented at Paper presented at Einstein Forum's International Conference on Genetics and Genealogy. Potsdam, 4–6, July, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B., 1993. "Culture is a verb: anthropological aspects of language and cultural process". In: Graddol, D., et al., eds. Language and Culture. Clevedon, Avon: British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Multilingual Matters; 1993. pp. 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• The Scientist, 2004. Big changes afoot in Spain, The Scientist (2004), 29 March, available at www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040329/02/ (accessed, 23 May 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. A., et al., 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts, Science 282 (1998), pp. 1145–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2002. Abortion Policies: A Global Review (2002), available at www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/ (accessed 8 September 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., 1998. The politicisation of culture, Anthropology Today 14 (1) (1998), pp. 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yahoo!news, 2004. Spain to authorise stem cell research, (2004), available at http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl = story&cid = …/spain_health_biotech_04092718073 (accessed 7 June 2006).
   Google Scholar