Regulating stem cell research and human cloning in an Australian context: the Lockhart Review

References

• Anon, , 2007. Stem cell ban may cause brain drain, The age (2007), 20 June [online]. Available from: http://www.theage.com.au [Accessed 20 June 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, 2006. "‘Human embryo’ – a biological definition". Canberra. 2006, National Health and Medical Research Council Discussion Paper 2005, National Health and Medical Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology Australia, 2006a. Public support for stem cell research remains strong, (2006a), Biotechnology Australia media release, 3 May [online]. Available from: www.biotechnology.gov.au [Accessed 18 June 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology Australia, 2006b. Key issues on stem cells [online], (2006b), Available from: http://www.biotechnology.gov.au/assets/documents/bainternet/StemCells2006820060502132032.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia, 2001. Human cloning: scientific, ethical, and regulatory aspects of human cloning and stem cell research. Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 2001, The Andrews Report, House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia, 2002a. "Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002". Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 2002a.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia, 2002b. "Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002". Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 2002b.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia, 2005. Legislation review of Australia's Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 and Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002, The Lockhart Report [online]. Canberra: Legislation Review Committee; 2005, Available from: http://www.lockhartreview.com.au [Accessed 19 June 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia, 2006a. "Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Act 2006". Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 2006a.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia, 2006b. "Legislative responses to recommendations of the Lockhart Review". Canberra: Parliament House; 2006b, The Senate Standing Committee on Community Affairs, Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Dickins, A., 2006. Vital issues and theoretical challenges: international political economy and the global bioeconomy, 82 (3) (2006), Working Paper 7, Global Biopolitics Research Group. Published in International Affairs, 2006, Available from: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/biopolitics [Accessed 26 July 2006].
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, S., and Ankeny, R., 2006. Regulation of hESC research in Australia: promises and pitfalls for deliberative democratic approaches, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (2006), pp. 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, R., and Einsiedal, E., 2003. Life and death politics: social movements and stem cell research. Presented at Paper presented at Social Studies of Science Society (4S) Annual Meeting. Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 5–19, October, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• DTI, 2006. An assessment of regenerative medicine and stem cell technology – a mission to Australia. London, UK: Department of Trade and Industry and East of England Stem Cell Network; 2006, Global Watch Mission Report.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., 1999. Review essay: what we know and what we don't know about cloning and society, New Genetics and Society 18 (1999), pp. 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., 2006. Embryonic economies: the double reproductive value of stem cells, BioSocieties 1 (2006), pp. 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ganchoff, C., 2004. Regenerating movements: embryonic stem cells and the politics of potentiality, Sociology of Health and Illness 26 (6) (2004), pp. 757–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W., 2004. The Australian policy debate about human embryonic stem cell research, Health Law Review 12 (2) (2004), pp. 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, O., 2005. Regulating stem-cell research and human cloning in an Australian context: an exercise in protecting the status of the human subject, New Genetics and Society 24 (2) (2005), pp. 125–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA, 2007. Hybrids and chimeras: a report on the findings of the consultation (2007), [online]. Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1517.html [Accessed 26 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Holliman, R., 2004. Media coverage of cloning: a study of media content, production and reception, Public Understanding of Science 13 (2004), pp. 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirejczyk, M., 1999. Parliamentary cultures and human embryos: the Dutch and British debates compared, Social Studies of Science 26 (6) (1999), pp. 889–912.
   Google Scholar
• Nerisini, F., 2000. And man descended from the sheep: the public debate on cloning in the Italian press, Public Understanding of Science 9 (2000), pp. 359–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., Gogarty, B., and Chalmers, D., 2001. Human cloning and stem cell research, Australian Health Law Bulletin 10 (3) (2001), pp. 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neil, G., 2007. Australia ends stem-cell cloning ban, Nature Biotechnology 25 (2) (2007), p. 153, [online]. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nbt/Journal/v25/n2/full/nbt0207-153.html [Accessed 19 March 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Riley, R., 2006. Stem the brain drain, Herald Sun 20 (2006), August [online]. Available from: http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/robynriley/index.php/heraldsun/comments/stem_the_brain_drain/desc/ [Accessed 8 July 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B., 2007. The global politics of human embryonic stem cell science, Global Governance 13 (2007), pp. 277–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., 2002. Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 6 (2002), pp. 305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., 2005. "Stem cell research, biopolitics and globalization". Routledge; 2005, Working Paper 4, Global Biopolitics Research Group [online]. Available from: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/sspp/cbas/research/biopolitics/papers/ [Accessed 19 March 2008]. A revised version will be published in Mapping biopolitics: medical-scientific transformations and the rise of new forms of governance, (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar