Publication Cover
New Genetics and Society
Critical Studies of Contemporary Biosciences
Volume 27, 2008 - Issue 1
789
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A preliminary study of how multiple exposures to messages about genetics impact on lay attitudes towards racial and genetic discrimination

, , , &
Pages 43-56 | Published online: 07 May 2008

References

  • Bates, B. R., et al., 2004. Evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing of race-based pharmacogenomics: a focus group study of public understandings of applied genomic medication, Journal of Health Communication 9 (2004), pp. 541–559.
  • Bernal, M., 1997. "Race in history". In: VanHorne, W. A., ed. Global convulsions: race, ethnicity and nationalism at the end of the twentieth century. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1997. pp. 75–92.
  • Bevan, J. L., et al., 2003. Informed lay preferences for delivery of racially varied pharmacogenomics, Genetics in Medicine 5 (2003), pp. 393–399.
  • Bloche, M. G., 2004. Race-based therapeutics, New England Journal of Medicine 351 (2004), pp. 2035–2037.
  • Braun, L., 2002. Race, ethnicity and health: can genetics explain disparities?, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45 (2002), pp. 159–174.
  • Caraco, Y., 2004. Genes and the response to drugs, New England Journal of Medicine 351 (2004), pp. 2867–2869.
  • Caulfield, T., and Bubela, T., 2004. Media representations of genetic discoveries: hype in the headlines?, Health Law Review 12 (2004), pp. 53–61.
  • Clayton, E. W., 2003. Ethical, legal and social implications of genomic medicine, New England Journal of Medicine 349 (2003), pp. 562–569.
  • Collins, F. S., 1999. Medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project, New England Journal of Medicine 341 (1999), pp. 28–37.
  • Collins, F. S., 2004. What we do and don't know about “race”, “ethnicity”, genetics and health at the dawn of the genome era, Nature Genetics 36 (2004), pp. S13–S15.
  • Condit, C. M., 1999. How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor, Public Understanding of Science 8 (1999), pp. 169–180.
  • Condit, C. M., and Parrott, R. L., 2004. Perceived levels of health risk associated with linguistic descriptors and type of disease, Science Communication 26 (2004), pp. 152–161.
  • Condit, C. M., Parrott, R. L., and O'Grady, B., 2000. "Principles and practice of communication processes for genetics in public health". In: Khoury, M. J., Burke, W., and Thomson, E., eds. Genetics and public health: translating advances in human genetics into disease prevention and health promotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 549–568.
  • Condit, C. M., and Williams, M., 1997. Audience responses to the discourse of medical genetics: evidence against the critique of medicalization, Health Communication 8 (1997), pp. 219–235.
  • Condit, C. M., et al., 2001. An exploratory study of the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism, Science Communication 22 (2001), pp. 379–395.
  • Condit, C. M., et al., 2003. Attitudinal barriers to delivery of race-targeted pharmacogenomics among informed lay persons, Genetics in Medicine 5 (2003), pp. 385–392.
  • Condit, C. M., et al., 2004a. Exploration of the impact of messages about genes and race on lay attitudes, Clinical Genetics 66 (2004a), pp. 402–408.
  • Condit, C. M., et al., 2004b. The role of “genetics” in popular understandings of race in the United States, Public Understanding of Science 13 (2004b), pp. 249–272.
  • Conrad, P., and Weinberg, D., 1996. Has the gene for alcoholism been discovered three times since 1980?, Perspectives on Social Problems 8 (1996), pp. 3–25.
  • Daar, A. S., and Singer, P. A., 2005. Pharmacogenetics and geographical ancestry: implications for drug development and global health, Nature Reviews Genetics 6 (2005), pp. 241–246.
  • Dates, J. L., and Barlow, W., 1990. Dates, J. L., and Barlow, W., eds. Split image: African Americans in the mass media. Washington, DC: Howard University Press; 1990.
  • Dijck, J. V., 1998. Imagenation: popular images of genetics. New York University Press; 1998.
  • Duster, T., 1990. Backdoor to eugenics. New York: Routledge; 1990.
  • Entman, R. M., 1990. Modern racism and the images of black in local television news, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1990), pp. 332–345.
  • Entman, R. M., and Rojecki, A., 2000. The black image in the white mind: media and race in America. University of Chicago Press; 2000.
  • Exner, D. V., et al., 2001. Lesser response to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy in black as compared with white patients with left ventricular dysfunction, New England Journal of Medicine 344 (2001), pp. 1351–1357.
  • Foster, M. W., Sharp, R. R., and Mulvihill, J. J., 2001. Pharmacogenetics, race, and ethnicity: social identities and individualized medical care, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 23 (2001), pp. 232–238.
  • Goodman, A. H., 2000. Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health), American Journal of Public Health 90 (2000), pp. 1699–1702.
  • Graves, J. L., 2001. The emperor's new clothes: biological theories of race at the millennium. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2001.
  • Guttmacher, A. E., and Collins, F. S., 2003. Welcome to the genomic era, New England Journal of Medicine 349 (2003), pp. 996–998.
  • Hansen, A., 2006. Tampering with nature: “nature” and the “natural” in media coverage of genetics and biotechnology, Media, Culture and Society 28 (2006), pp. 811–834.
  • Hasian, M. A., 1996. The rhetoric of eugenics in Anglo-American thought. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press; 1996.
  • Holt, T. C., 2000. Problem of race in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2000.
  • Hubbard, R., and Wald, E., 1993. Exploding the gene myth: how genetic information is produced and manipulated by scientists, physicians, employers, insurance companies, educators and law enforcers. Boston: Beacon Press; 1993.
  • Jhally, S., and Lewis, J., 1992. Enlightened racism: The Cosby Show, racism, and the myth of the American Dream. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1992.
  • Kahn, J., 2006. Genes, race and population: avoiding a collision of categories, American Journal of Public Health 96 (2006), pp. 1965–1970.
  • Kevles, D. J., 1980. In the name of eugenics: genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1980.
  • Kevles, D. J., and Hood, L., 1992. Kevles, D. J., and Hood, L., eds. The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
  • Larson, E. J., 1995. Sex, race, and science: eugenics in the Deep South. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995.
  • Lippman, A., 1992. Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the Human Genome and Health Care, Social Science & Medicine 35 (1992), pp. 1469–1476.
  • Lynch, J. L., 2006. Race and radical renamings: using cluster agon method to assess the radical potential of “European American” as a substitute for “White.”, KB Journal 2 (2) (2006), [online]. Available from: http://kbjournal.org/lynch [Accessed 20 April 2007].
  • Lynch, J. L., and Condit, C. M., 2006. Genes and race in the news: a test of competing theories of news coverage, American Journal of Health Behavior 30 (2006), pp. 125–135.
  • McConahay, J. B., 1986. "Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale". In: Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L., eds. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1986. pp. 91–125.
  • Nelkin, D., and Lindee, S., 1995. The DNA mystique: the gene as cultural icon. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1995.
  • Parrott, R. L., Silk, K. J., and Condit, C. M., 2003. Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors, Social Science & Medicine 56 (2003), pp. 1099–1109.
  • Parrott, R. L., et al., 2005. The development and validation of tools to assess genetic discrimination and genetically based racism, Journal of the National Medical Association 97 (2005), pp. 980–990.
  • Ramsey, M., Achter, P. J., and Condit, C. M., 2001. Genetics, race, and crime: an audience study exploring the effects of, The bell curve and book reviews. Critical Studies in Media Communication 18 (2001), pp. 1–22.
  • Rebbeck, T. R., Halbert, C. H., and Sankar, P., 2006. Genetics, epidemiology and cancer disparities: is it black and white?, Journal of Clinical Oncology 24 (2006), pp. 2164–2169.
  • Reilly, K., Kaufman, S., and Bodino, A., 2003. Racism: a global reader. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe; 2003.
  • Risch, N., et al., 2002. Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease, Genome Biology 3 (2002), pp. 2007–2012.
  • Rothman, B. K., 1998. Genetic maps and human imaginations: the limits of science in understanding who we are. New York: W.W. Norton; 1998.
  • Sankar, P., et al., 2004. Genetic research and health disparities, Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (2004), pp. 2985–2989.
  • Schneider, D. J., 2004. The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press; 2004.
  • Schuman, H., et al., 1998. Racial attitudes in America: trends and interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.
  • Schwartz, R. S., 2001. Racial profiling in medical research, New England Journal of Medicine 344 (2001), pp. 1392–1393.
  • Silva, V. T., 2005. In the beginning was the gene: the hegemony of genetic thinking in contemporary culture, Communication Theory 15 (2005), pp. 100–123.
  • Taylor, A. L., et al., 2004. Combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in blacks with heart failure, New England Journal of Medicine 351 (2004), pp. 2049–2057.
  • Turner, P. A., 1994. Ceramic uncles and celluloid mammies: black images and their influence on culture. New York: Doubleday; 1994.
  • Weijer, C., and Miller, P. B., 2004. Protecting communities in pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic research, The Pharmacogenomics Journal 4 (2004), pp. 9–16.
  • Wetherell, M., and Potter, J., 1992. Mapping the language of racism: discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press; 1992.
  • Wilcox, S. A., 2003. Cultural context and the conventions of science Journalism: drama and contradiction in media coverage of biological ideas about sexuality, Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (2003), pp. 225–247.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.