Access to data and material for research: putting empirical evidence into perspective

References

• Aldhous, P., 2000. Prospect of data sharing gives brain mappers a headache, Nature 406 (2000), pp. 445–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson, K., and Eakin, C., 2001. Making sure that the world's paleodata do not get buried, Nature 412 (2001), p. 269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., Seashore, K., and Earle, J., 1994. Disciplinary and departmental effects on observation of faculty and graduate student misconduct, Journal of Higher Education 65 (1994), pp. 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburner, M., 2001. Privatising our genes?, (2001), Open Democracy [online]. Available from: http://www.opendemocracy.net/content/articles/PDF/407.pdf [Accessed 6 January 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Bagioli, M., 2006. Galileo's instruments of credit: telescopes, images, secrecy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., 1987. Meeting on AIDS drugs turns into open forum, Science 237 (1987), pp. 1287–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, K., 2001. The sharing of cDNA microarray data, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001), pp. 438–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, D., et al., 1996. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry, New England Journal of Medicine 335 (1996), pp. 1734–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, D., et al., 1997. Withholding research results in academic life sciences, Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (1997), pp. 1224–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, D., et al., 2006. Data witholding in genetics and the other life sciences: prevalences and predictors, Academic Medicine 81 (2006), pp. 137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok, S., 1982. Secrecy and openness in science: ethical considerations, Science, Technology & Human Values 7 (1982), pp. 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W., 1989. AIDS researchers upset by refusal to share probes on mysterious microbe, Science 244 (1989), p. 416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, E., and Bendavid, E., 2003. Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers, Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 6 (2003), pp. 241–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell, E., et al., 2000. Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials, Research Policy 29 (2000), pp. 303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, E., et al., 2002. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey, Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (2002), pp. 473–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caveman, 2001. Send me all of your reagents and ideas: we want to work on the same experiments, Journal of Cell Science 114 (2001), pp. 1037–1038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ceci, S., 1988. Scientists' attitudes toward data sharing, Science, Technology & Human Values 13 (1988), pp. 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S., and Walker, E., 1983. Private archives and public needs, American Psychologist 38 (1983), pp. 414–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalk, R., 1985. Overview: AAAS project on secrecy and openness in science and technology, Science, Technology & Human Values 10 (1985), pp. 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Chicurel, M., 2000. Databasing the brain, Nature 406 (2000), pp. 822–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M., et al., 2003. Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 5 (2003), pp. 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1995. Share and share alike isn't always the rule in science, Science 268 (1995), pp. 1715–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Deegan, R., and McCormack, S., 2001. Intellectual property: patents, secrecy, and DNA, Science 293 (2001), p. 217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counelis, J., 1993. Toward empirical studies on university ethics: a new role for institutional research, Journal of Higher Education 64 (1993), pp. 74–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R., 2000. Young, worldly and unhelpful all miss out on data sharing, Nature 404 (2000), p. 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., and David, P., 1994. Toward a new economics of science, Research Policy 23 (1994), pp. 487–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittert, N., Diepenbroek, M., and Grobe, H., 2001. Scientific data must be made available to all, Nature 414 (2001), p. 393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, B., et al., 1997. Bioequivalence of generic and brand-name levothyroxine products in the treatment of hypothyroidism, Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (1997), pp. 1205–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, S., 1970. Galileo studies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, R., 2003. Patent swords and shields, Science 299 (2003), pp. 1018–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, P., and Lancaster, J., 2002. Mapping context and content: the BarinMap model, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002), p. 319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D., et al., 2003. Towards effective and rewarding data sharing, Neuroinformatics 1 (2003), pp. 289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind, D., 2001. Sharing gene expression data: an array of options, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001), pp. 435–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobstein, C., 1985. Biotechnology and open university science, Science, Technology & Human Values 10 (1985), pp. 55–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grushcow, J., 2004. Measuring secrecy: a cost of the patent system revealed, Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2004), pp. 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, W., 1974. Competition in science, American Sociological Review 39 (1974), pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., Brewster, A., and Asher, J., 2005. Intellectual property in the AAAS scientific community. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrik, T., 1988. Justifications for the sharing of social science data, Law and Human Behavior 12 (1988), pp. 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, R., and Eisenberg, R., 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research, Science 280 (1998), pp. 698–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, D., 1985. Openness and secrecy in science: their origins and limitations, Science, Technology & Human Values 10 (1985), pp. 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Insel, T., et al., 2003. Data-sharing in an information age, Public Library of Science Biology 1 (2003), pp. 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• King, R., 1996. Bitter pill: how a drug company paid for university study, then undermined it, Wall Street Journal (1996), p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Kornberg, A., 2000. Ten commandments: lessons from the enzymology of DNA replication, Journal of Bacteriology 182 (2000), pp. 3613–3618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg, A., 2003. Ten commandments of enzymology, amended, Trends in Biochemical Sciences 28 (2003), pp. 515–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslow, S., 2000. Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data?, Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000), pp. 863–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslow, S., 2002. Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery?, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002), pp. 311–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Long, P., 2001. Openness, secrecy, authorship: technical arts and the culture of knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K., Anderson, M., and Rosenberg, L., 1995. Academic misconduct and values: the department's influence, Review of Higher Education 18 (1995), pp. 393–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macilwain, C., 2000. Biologists challenge sequencers on parasite genome publication, Nature 405 (2000), pp. 601–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, E., 2002a. DNA sequencer protests being scooped with his own data, Science 295 (2002a), pp. 1206–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, E., 2002b. Clear-cut publication rules prove elusive, Science 295 (2002b), p. 1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain, K., 1991. Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics, Science, Technology & Human Values 16 (1991), pp. 491–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain, K., 1995. Mandating sharing: journal policies in the natural sciences, Science Communication 16 (1995), pp. 403–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, E., 1985. Openness and secrecy in science: some notes on early history, Science, Technology & Human Values 10 (1985), pp. 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R., 1942. Science and technology in a democratic order, Journal of Legal and Political Science 1 (1942), pp. 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mirnics, K., 2001. Microarrays in brain research: the good, the bad and the ugly, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001), pp. 444–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., et al., 2004. Ivory tower and industrial innovation: university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, F., and Stern, S., 2005. "Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis". NBER Working Paper Series 11465. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies, 2003. Sharing publication-related data and materials: responsibilities of authorship in the life sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nature, 1941. The Commonwealth of science, Nature 148 (1941), p. 393.
   Google Scholar
• Nature, 2001. Make the most of paleodata, Nature 411 (2001), p. 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature Neuroscience, 2000. A debate over fMRI data sharing, Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000), pp. 845–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature Neuroscience, 2003. Neuroscience in the post-genome era, Nature Neuroscience 6 (2003), p. 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., 1982. Intellectual property: the control of scientific information, Science 216 (1982), pp. 704–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., 2004. The market economy and the scientific commons, Research Policy 33 (2004), pp. 455–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment, 1984. "Commercial biotechnology: an international analysis [online]". Washington, DC: US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment; 1984, OTA-BA-218. Available from: http://www.princeton.edu/∼ota/disk3/1984/8407_n.html [Accessed 6 January 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Patrinos, A., and Drell, D., 2002. The times they are a-changin', Nature 417 (2002), pp. 589–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A., 1999. Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science, Northwestern University Law Review 94 (1999), pp. 77–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., 1996. Secrecy in medical research, New England Journal of Medicine 334 (1996), pp. 392–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, S., 1989. "Glass works: Newton's prism and the uses of experiment". In: Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S., eds. The uses of experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. pp. 67–104.
   Google Scholar
• Science, 1959. Views on secrecy by American Nobel prize-winners, Science 130 (1959), pp. 85–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shuchman, M., 1998. Secrecy in science: the flock worker's lung investigation, Annals of Internal Medicine 129 (1998), pp. 341–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, B., and Stanley, M., 1988. Data sharing: the primary researcher's perspective, Law and Human Behavior 12 (1988), pp. 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, T., 1988. Analysis and reanalysis of shared scientific data, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 495 (1988), pp. 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, S., 1980. "Stigler's law of eponymy". In: Transactions of the New York Academy of Science. Vol. 39, Series II. 1980. pp. 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Swazey, J., Anderson, M., and Louis, K., 1993. Ethical problems in academic research, American Scientist 81 (1993), pp. 542–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., 2007. Research sharing, ethics and public benefit, Nature Biotechnology 25 (2007), pp. 398–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theologis, A., and Davis, R., 2004. To give or not to give? That is the question, Plant Physiology 135 (2004), pp. 4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toga, A., 2002. Neuroimage databases: the good, the bad and the ugly, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002), pp. 302–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden, A., 1984. "Galileo and the telescope". In: Galluzzi, P., ed. Novità celesti e crisi del sapere. Florence: Giunti; 1984. pp. 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, J., and Gazzaniga, M., 2002. Databasing fMRI studies: towards a “discovery science” of brain function, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002), pp. 314–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, J., et al., 2004. Sharing neuroimaging studies of human cognition, Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004), pp. 473–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogeli, C., et al., 2006. Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey, Academic Medicine 81 (2006), pp. 128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, N., 1998. Scientist's plan: map all DNA within 3 years, New York Times (1998), p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., Cho, C., and Cohen, W., 2005. View from the bench: patents and material transfer, Science 309 (2005), pp. 2002–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, P., and Hong, W., 2003. Secrecy is increasing in step with competition, Nature 422 (2003), pp. 801–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., 2001. The double helix: a personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Touchstone; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R., 1993. Reflections on the current state of data and reagent exchange among biomedical researchers. In: Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, eds. National academies, responsible science: ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R., 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, M., and van Helden, A., 1992. Representing the Heavens: Galileo and visual astronomy, Isis 83 (1992), pp. 214–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, J., 2000. Real science: what it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar