Publication Cover
New Genetics and Society
Critical Studies of Contemporary Biosciences
Volume 30, 2011 - Issue 1
616
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Media presentation and public understanding of stem cells and stem cell research in Hungary

&
Pages 1-26 | Published online: 03 Mar 2011

References

  • 2006. évi XCVII. törvénnyel módosított 1997. évi CLIV tv. az egészségügyről [Act CLIV of 1997 on Public Health amended by Act XCVII of 2006] [online]. Available from: http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=99700154.TV [Accessed 24 May 2009]..
  • Augoustinos, M., Russin, A., and LeCouteur, A., 2009. Representations of the stem-cell cloning fraud: from scientific breakthrough to managing the stake and interest of science, Public Understanding of Science 18 (6) (2009), pp. 687–703.
  • Bajomi-Lázár, P., 2006. Manipulál-e a média? [Does the media manipulate?], Médiakutató 2 (2006), pp. 56–85.
  • Checar, C. K., and Kitzinger, J., 2007. Science, patriotism and discourses of nation and culture: reflections on the South Korean stem cell breakthroughs and scandals, New Genetics and Society 26 (3) (2007), pp. 289–307.
  • Glasner, P., 2005. Banking on immortality? Exploring the stem cell supply chain from embryo to therapeutic application, Current Sociology 53 (2) (2005), pp. 355–366.
  • Hegedűs, R., 2007. "Újabb adatok a magyar “egyházias vallásosság” társadalmi megjelenéséről [Recent data on the social appearance of Hungarian “church religiousness”]". In: Hegedűs, R., and Révay, E., eds. Úton. Tanulmányok Tomka Miklós tiszteletére. Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem Vallástudományi Tanszék; 2007. pp. 283–296.
  • Henderson, L., and Kitzinger, J., 1999. The human drama of genetics: “hard” and “soft” media representations of inherited breast cancer, Sociology of Health & Illness 21 (5) (1999), pp. 560–578.
  • Hughes, E., Kitzinger, J., and Murdock, G., 2008. "Media discourses and framing of risk. Working Paper 27 [online]". 2008, Available from: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/resources/KitzingerWkPaper27.pdf [Accessed 8 December 2009].
  • Jurberg, C., et al., 2009. Embryonic stem cell: a climax in the reign of the Brazilian media, Public Understanding of Science 18 (6) (2009), pp. 719–729.
  • Karácsony, G., 2001. Értékek és választások [Values and choices], Educatio 3 (2001), pp. 504–516.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., and Gurevitch, M., 1974. "Utilization of mass communication by the individual". In: Blumler, J. G., and Katz, E., eds. The uses of mass communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1974. pp. 19–32.
  • Kitzinger, J., 2008a. "A basic overview of findings from focus groups about stem cell research. Unpublished manuscript". Cardiff. 2008a.
  • Kitzinger, J., 2008b. Questioning hype, rescuing hope? The Hwang stem cells scandal and the reassertion of hopeful horizons, Science as Culture 17 (4) (2008b), pp. 417–434.
  • Kitzinger, J., 1999. A sociology of media power: Key issues in audience reception research. In: G. Philo, ed. Message received. London: Longman, 3–20..
  • Kitzinger, J., and Williams, C., 2005. Forecasting science futures: legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate, Social Science & Medicine 61 (3) (2005), pp. 731–740.
  • Lupton, D., and Tulloch, J., 2001. Risk, the mass media and personal biography, European Journal of Cultural Studies 4 (1) (2001), pp. 5–27.
  • Nisbet, M., Brossard, D., and Kroepsch, A., 2003. Framing science – the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics, Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 8 (2) (2003), pp. 36–70.
  • Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T., and Murdock, G., 2001. Social amplification of risk: the media and the public. Sudbury: HSE Books, Contact research report 329/2001; 2001.
  • Prainsack, B., 2006. “Negotiating life”: the regulation of human cloning and embryonic stem cell research in Israel, Social Studies of Science 36 (2) (2006), pp. 173–205.
  • Reis, P., 2008. How Brazilian and North American newspapers frame the stem cell research debate, Science Communication 29 (3) (2008), pp. 316–334.
  • Tomka, M., 1996. "Vallás és vallásosság [Religion and religiousness]". In: Andorka, R., Kolosi, T., and Vukovich, G., eds. Társadalmi riport 1996 [Social report 1996]. Budapest: Tárki; 1996. pp. 592–616.
  • Vicsek, L., 2004. Bizonytalanságérzet a mai Magyarországon – Egy fókuszcsoportos vizsgálat eredményei [Feeling of insecurity in Hungary today – findings of a focus group study], Társadalomkutatás 22 (2–3) (2004), pp. 279–313.
  • Vicsek, L., 2010. Issues in the analysis of focus groups: generalisability, quantifiability, treatment of context and quotations, The Qualitative Report 15 (1) (2010), pp. 122–141, [online]. Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-1/vicsek.pdf [Accessed 24 February 2010].
  • Weingart, P., Salzmann, C., and Wormann, S., 2008. The social embedding of biomedicine: an analysis of German media debates 1995–2004, Public Understanding of Science 17 (3) (2008), pp. 381–396.
  • Williams, C., Kitzinger, J., and Henderson, L., 2003. Envisaging the embryo in stem cell research: rhetorical strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates, Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (7) (2003), pp. 793–814.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.