References
- ABC News Online, 2002. Crippled rat experiment not done with stem cells [online]. 2002, Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200208/s660289.htm [Accessed 30 June 2007].
- Australian Stem Cell Centre, 2010. Fact sheet 6. Ethics & law of stem cell research [online]. 2010, Available from: http://www.stemcellcentre.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/FactSheets/Fact%20Sheet%206%20-%20Law%20and%20Ethics%20of%20Stem%20Cell%20Research.pdf [Accessed 26 October 2010].
- Barnes, B., 1983. "On the conventional character of knowledge and cognition". In: Knorr-Cetina, K. D., and Mulkay, M., eds. Science observed: perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage; 1983. pp. 19–51.
- Bloor, D., 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1976.
- Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L., 1999. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
- Casper, M. J., 1995. "Fetal cyborgs and technomoms on the reproductive frontier: which way to the carnival?". In: Gray, C. H., ed. The cyborg handbook. New York, NY: Routledge; 1995. pp. 183–202.
- Castree, N., and Braun, B., 1998. "The construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures". In: Castree, N., and Braun, B., eds. Remaking reality: nature at the millennium. London: Routledge; 1998. pp. 3–42.
- Dickenson, D., 2006. The lady vanishes: what's missing from the stem cell debate, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1) (2006), pp. 43–54, (doi:10.1007/s11673-006-9003-8).
- Dictionary.Com, 2007. Merriam-Webster's medical dictionary [online]. 2007, Available from: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/embryo [Accessed 22 October 2010].
- Do No Harm, 2002. Stem cell science we can all live with [online]. Submission to the Australian Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee on Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill 2002. Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/emb_cloning/submissions/sub1042.doc [Accessed 1 June 2009].
- Ferber, D. S., 2007. As sure as eggs? Responses to an ethical question posed by Abramov, Elchalal, and Schenker, Journal of Clinical Ethics 18 (1) (2007), pp. 35–55.
- Franklin, S., 1997. Dolly: a new form of transgenic breedwealth, Environmental Values 6 (1997), pp. 427–437, (doi:10.3197/096327197776678997).
- Franklin, S., 2006. The cyborg embryo: our path to transbiology, Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8) (2006), pp. 167–187, (doi:10.1177/0263276406069230).
- Gieryn, T., 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists, American Sociological Review 48 (6) (1983), pp. 781–795, (doi:10.2307/2095325).
- Gieryn, T., 1995. "Boundaries of science". In: Jasanoff, S., et al., eds. Handbook of science and technology studies. London: Sage; 1995. pp. 393–443.
- Gieryn, T., 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press; 1999.
- Gilbert, N. G., and Mulkay, M., 1984. Opening Pandora's box: a sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. London: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
- Gottweis, H., 2002. Stem cell policies in the United States and in Germany: between bioethics and regulation, Policy Studies Journal 30 (4) (2002), pp. 444–469, (doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2002.tb02158.x).
- Goven, J., 2006. Processes of inclusion, cultures of calculation, structures of power: scientific citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (5) (2006), pp. 565–598, (doi:10.1177/0162243906289612).
- Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege on partial perspectives, Feminist Studies 14 (3) (1988), pp. 575–599, (doi:10.2307/3178066).
- Haraway, D. J., 1991. "A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century". In: Haraway, D.J., ed. Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. London: Free Association; 1991. pp. 149–181.
- Haraway, D., 1992. "The promise of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others". In: Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., and Treichler, P., eds. New York, NY: Routledge; 1992. pp. 298–337.
- Haraway, D. J., 1997. Modest_witness@second_millennium.FemaleMan©meets_OncoMouse™: feminism and technoscience. New York, NY: Routledge; 1997.
- Harvey, O., 2005. Regulating stem-cell research and human cloning in an Australian context: an exercise in protecting the status of the human subject, New Genetics and Society 24 (2) (2005), pp. 125–136, (doi:10.1080/14636770500184776).
- Harvey, O., 2008. Regulating stem cell research and human cloning in an Australian context: the Lockhart Review, New Genetics and Society 27 (1) (2008), pp. 33–42, (doi:10.1080/14636770701843600).
- Hauskeller, C., 2005a. "The language of stem cell science". In: Bender, W., Hauskeller, C., and Manzei, A., eds. Crossing borders. Grenzüberschreitungen. Ethische, politische und religiöse kontexte der stammzellforschung. Münster: Agenda Verlag; 2005a. pp. 39–60.
- Hauskeller, C., 2005b. Science in touch: functions of biomedical terminology, Biology and Philosophy 20 (2005b), pp. 815–835, (doi:10.1007/s10539-004-2280-x).
- House of Representatives, 2001. Human cloning: scientific, ethical and regulatory aspects of human cloning and stem cell research (Andrews Report) [online]. 2001, Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/LACA/humancloning/contents.htm [Accessed 22 October 2010].
- House of Representatives, 2002a. Official Hansard, August 21st [online]. 2002a, Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/dailys/dr210802.pdf [Accessed 26 October 2010].
- House of Representatives, 2002b. Official Hansard, August 27th [online]. 2002b, Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/reps/dailys/dr270802.pdf [Accessed 26 October 2010].
- Irwin, A., and Wynne, B., 1996. Irwin, A., and Wynne, B., eds. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
- ISSCR, n.d. Glossary of stem cell-related terms [online]. n.d, Available from: http://www.isscr.org/public/glossary.htm [Accessed 22 October 2010].
- Jasanoff, S., 2004. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge; 2004.
- Jasanoff, S., 2005a. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005a.
- Jasanoff, S., 2005b. In the democracies of DNA: ontological uncertainty and political order in three states, New Genetics and Society 24 (2) (2005b), pp. 139–155, (doi:10.1080/14636770500190864).
- Keller, E. F., 2008. Nature and the natural, BioSocieties 3 (2) (2008), pp. 117–124, (doi:10.1017/S1745855208006054).
- Kent, J., 2008. The fetal tissue economy: from the abortion clinic to the stem cell laboratory, Social Science & Medicine 67 (11) (2008), pp. 1747–1756, (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.027).
- Kerr, D. A., et al., 2003. Human embryonic germ cell derivatives facilitate motor recovery of rats with diffuse motor neuron injury, Journal of Neuroscience 23 (12) (2003), pp. 5131–5140.
- Latimer, H., 2011. Technologies, fetal icons, and genetic freaks: Shelley Jackson's Patchwork Girl and the limits and possibilities of Donna Haraway's cyborg, Modern Fiction Studies 57 (2) (2011), pp. 318–335, (doi:10.1353/mfs.2011.0051).
- Legislation Review Committee, 2005. Legislation review: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 and Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002. 2005, Reports December 2005 (Lockhart Review) [online]. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/research/embryos/review/legislation_review_reports_full_doc_19dec05.pdf [Accessed 11 December 2011].
- Legislation Review Committee, 2011. Independent review of the Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction Act 2002 and Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002. 2011, Reports June 2011 (Heerey Review) [online]. Available from: https://legislationreview.nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/legislation_review_reports.pdf [Accessed 19 December 2011].
- Lynch, J., 2009. Stem cells and the embryo: biorhetoric and scientism in congressional debate, Public Understanding of Science 18 (3) (2009), pp. 309–324, (doi:10.1177/0963662507085164).
- Marks, N. J., 2010. Defining stem cells? Scientists and their classifications of nature, The Sociological Review 58 (s1) (2010), pp. 32–50, (doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01910.x).
- Martin, E., 1987. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1987.
- Mulkay, M., 1994. The triumph of the pre-embryo: interpretations of the human embryo in parliamentary debate over embryo research, Social Studies of Science 24 (4) (1994), pp. 611–639, (doi:10.1177/030631279402400401).
- Mulkay, M., 1997. The embryo research debate: science and the politics of reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
- Nelkin, D., 1975. The political impact of technical expertise, Social Studies of Science 5 (1) (1975), pp. 35–54, (doi:10.1177/030631277500500103).
- Nelkin, D. and Andrews, L., 1998. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. The Hastings Center report, 28 (5), 30–9..
- Newell, C., 2006. Disability, bioethics, and rejected knowledge, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3) (2006), pp. 269–283, (doi:10.1080/03605310600712901).
- NHMRC, 1996. Ethical guidelines on assisted reproductive technology [online]. 1996, Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/e28.pdf [Accessed 11 June 2010].
- NHMRC, 1999. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans [online]. 1999, Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/e35.pdf [Accessed 11 June 2010].
- O'Riordan, K. and Haran, J., 2009. From reproduction to research; sourcing eggs, IVF and cloning in the UK. Feminist Theory, 10 (2), 191–210.
- Parliament of Australia, S, 2002a. Provisions of the Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill: report [online]. 2002a, Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/emb_cloning/report/ [Accessed 6 November 2011].
- Parliament of Australia, S, 2002b. Provisions of the Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill: supplementary report in favour of the legislation [online]. 2002b, Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/emb_cloning/report/d02.htm [Accessed 1 November 2011].
- Parry, S., 2003. The politics of cloning: mapping the rhetorical convergence of embryos and stem cells in parliamentary debates, New Genetics and Society 22 (2) (2003), pp. 177–200, (doi:10.1080/1463677032000102594).
- Parry, S., 2006. (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments, Social Science & Medicine 62 (10) (2006), pp. 2349–2359, (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.024).
- Parry, S., 2009. Stem cell scientists' discursive strategies for cognitive authority, Science as Culture 18 (1) (2009), pp. 89–114, (doi:10.1080/09505430802603837).
- Parry, S., and Dupré, J., 2010. Parry, S., and Dupré, J., eds. Nature after the genome. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell/The Sociological Review; 2010.
- Penley, C., Ross, A., and Haraway, D., 1990. Cyborgs at large: interview with Donna Haraway, Social Text 25/26 (1990), pp. 8–23, (doi:10.2307/466237).
- Petchesky, R. P., 1987. Fetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction, Feminist Studies 13 (2) (1987), pp. 262–292, (doi:10.2307/3177802).
- Pfeffer, N., 2008. What British women say matters to them about donating an aborted fetus to stem cell research: a focus group study, Social Science & Medicine 66 (12) (2008), pp. 2544–2554, (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.050).
- Pfeffer, N., 2009. How work reconfigures an “unwanted” pregnancy into “the right tool for the job” in stem cell research, Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (1) (2009), pp. 98–111, (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01117.x).
- Pfeffer, N., and Kent, J., 2006. Consent to the use of aborted fetuses in stem cell research and therapies, Clinical Ethics 1 (2006), pp. 216–218, (doi:10.1258/147775006779151210).
- Pfeffer, N., and Kent, J., 2007. Framing women, framing fetuses: how Britain regulates arrangements for the collection and use of aborted fetuses in stem cell research and therapies, BioSocieties 2 (4) (2007), pp. 429–447, (doi:10.1017/S1745855207005868).
- Prainsack, B., and Gmeiner, R., 2008. Clean soil and common ground: the biopolitics of human embryonic stem cell research in Austria, Science as Culture 17 (4) (2008), pp. 377–395, (doi:10.1080/09505430802515007).
- PregnancySurvey.com, 2007. Pregnancy glossary – medical terms from A to Z [online]. 2007, Available from: http://www.pregnancysurvey.com/pregnancy_glossary.html [Accessed 22 October 2010].
- Prins, B., 1995. The ethics of hybrid subjects: feminist constructivism according to Donna Haraway, Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (3) (1995), pp. 352–367, (doi:10.1177/016224399502000305).
- Prohibition of Human Cloning Act, 2002. Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 2002.
- Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Act, 2006. Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 2006.
- Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill, 2002 [online]. Available from: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2004B01296 [Accessed 19 December 2011]..
- Research Involving Human Embryos Act, 2002 [online]. Available from: http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/comact/11/6603/pdf/1452002.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2007]..
- Roberts, C., 2007. Messengers of sex: hormones, biomedicine and feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
- Robins, R., 2005. "Biomedical innovation or bioethical precaution: the stem cell debate in Australia". In: Hauskeller, C., Bender, W., and Manzei, A., eds. Crossing borders. Grenzüberschreitungen. Münster: Agenda Verlag; 2005. pp. 391–410.
- Rogers-Hayden, T., 2003. Re-negotiating science in environmentalists' submissions to New Zealand's Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, Environmental Values 12 (2003), pp. 515–534, (doi:10.3197/096327103129341432).
- Ross, K., 2007. Providing “thoughtful feedback”: public participation in the regulation of Australia's first genetically modified food crop, Science and Public Policy 34 (3) (2007), pp. 213–225, (doi:10.3152/030234207X211500).
- Rubin, B. P., 2008. Therapeutic promise in the discourse of human embryonic stem cell research, Science as Culture 17 (1) (2008), pp. 13–27, (doi:10.1080/09505430701872962).
- Satterfield, T., and Roberts, M., 2008. Incommensurate risks and the regulator's dilemma: considering culture in the governance of genetically modified organisms, New Genetics and Society 27 (3) (2008), pp. 201–216, (doi:10.1080/14636770802326877).
- Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee, 2002a. Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill 2002, September 17th [online]. 2002a, Official Committee Hansard. Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/commttee/s5776.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2011].
- Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee, 2002b. Research Involving Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill 2002, September 24th [online]. 2002b, Official Committee Hansard. Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/commttee/s5778.pdf [Accessed 28 May 2007].
- Sexton, S., 1999. If cloning is the answer, what was the question? Power and decision-making in the geneticisation of health [online]. 1999, Available from: http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/item.shtml?x=51972 [Accessed 17 August 2006].
- Shamblott, M. J., et al., 1998. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells, PNAS 95 (23) (1998), pp. 13726–13731, (doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13726).
- Shapin, S., 1995. "Trust, honesty, and the authority of science". In: Bulger, R. E., Bobby, E. M., and Fineberg, H., eds. Society's choices: social and ethical decision making in biomedicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995. pp. 388–408.
- Specialized Information Services, 2009. IUPAC glossary of terms used in toxicology [online]. 2009, Available from: http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/iupacglossary/glossaryf.html [Accessed 22 October 2010].
- Sperling, S., 2008. Converting ethics into reason: German stem cell policy between science and the law, Science as Culture 17 (4) (2008), pp. 363–375, (doi:10.1080/09505430802514919).
- Svendsen, M. N., and Koch, L., 2008. Unpacking the “spare embryo”: facilitating stem cell research in a moral landscape, Social Studies of Science 38 (1) (2008), pp. 93–110, (doi:10.1177/0306312707082502).
- University of South California Department of Surgery, n.d, Glossary of liver terms [online], Available from: http://www.surgery.usc.edu/divisions/hep/patientguide/glossary.html [Accessed 22 October 2010].
- van der Ploeg, I., 1995. Hermaphrodite patients: in vitro fertilization and the transformation of male infertility, Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (4) (1995), pp. 460–481, (doi:10.1177/016224399502000404).
- van der Ploeg, I., 2001. Prosthetic bodies: the construction of the fetus and the couple as patients in reproductive technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2001.
- van der Ploeg, I., 2004. “Only angels can do without skin”: on reproductive technology's hybrids and the politics of body boundaries, Body & Society 10 (2–3) (2004), pp. 153–181, (doi:10.1177/1357034X04042941).
- Wainwright, S., et al., 2006. Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory, Sociology of Health & Illness 28 (6) (2006), pp. 732–748, (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00539.x).
- Waldby, C., and Squier, S., 2003. Ontogeny, ontology, and phylogeny: embryonic life and stem cell technologies, Configurations 11 (1) (2003), pp. 27–46, (doi:10.1353/con.2004.0015).
- Williams, C., Alderson, P., and Farsides, B., 2001. Conflicting perceptions of the fetus: person, patient, “nobody,” commodity?, New Genetics and Society 20 (3) (2001), pp. 225–238, (doi:10.1080/14636770120092994).
- Williams, C., Kitzinger, J., and Henderson, L., 2003. Envisaging the embryo in stem cell research: rhetorical strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates, Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (7) (2003), pp. 793–814, (doi:10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00370.x).
- Wynne, B., 2005. "Risk as globalizing “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens". In: Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Wynne, B., eds. Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement. London: Zed Books; 2005. pp. 66–82.