Opening the DNA black box: demythologizing forensic genetics

References

• Amorim, A., 2008. A cautionary note on the evaluation of genetic evidence from uniparentally transmitted markers, Forensic Science International: Genetics 2 (4) (2008), pp. 376–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon, , 2007. Launching Forensic Science International daughter journal in 2007: Forensic Science International: Genetics, Forensic Science International: Genetics 1 (2007), pp. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Budowle, B., Kayser, M., and Sajantila, A., 2011. The demise of the United Kingdom's Forensic Science Service (FSS): loss of world-leading engine of innovation and development in the forensic sciences, Investigative Genetics 2 (2011), p. 4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler, J. M., 2005. Forensic DNA typing: biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, J. Y., and Sætnan, A. R., 2009. “It all happened so slowly” – on controlling function creep in forensic DNA databases, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 37 (3) (2009), pp. 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Keijser, J., and Elffers, H., 2012. Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals, Psychology, Crime & Law 18 (2) (2012), pp. 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duster, T., 2006. Explaining differential trust of DNA forensic technology: grounded assessment or inexplicable paranoia?, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2) (2006), pp. 293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmond, E., 2011. The building blocks of forensic science and law: recent work on DNA profiling (and photo comparison), Social Studies of Science 41 (1) (2011), pp. 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink, M., 2011a. Can this DNA sleuth help catch criminals?, Science 331 (6019) (2011a), pp. 838–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink, M., 2011b. Emerging forensics field may hit legal, ethical obstacles, Science 331 (6019) (2011b), p. 840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Hirschfeld, J., et al., 2008. GEP-ISFG proficiency testing programs: 2007 update, Forensic Science International: Genetics, Supplement Series 1 (2008), pp. 674–676.
   Google Scholar
• Gershaw, C. J., et al., 2011. Forensic utilization of familial searches in DNA databases, Forensic Science International: Genetics 5 (1) (2011), pp. 16–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., 2010. Science in court: DNA's identity crisis, Nature 464 (7287) (2010), pp. 347–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill, P., 2009. When DNA goes on trial, Nature 460 (7251) (2009), pp. 34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., et al., 2006. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures, Forensic Science International 160 (2006), pp. 90–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjertson, D. W., et al., 2007. ISFG: recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing, Forensic Science International: Genetics 1 (3–4) (2007), pp. 223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R., and Prainsack, B., 2010. Hindmarsh, R., and Prainsack, B., eds. Genetic suspects: global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• James, S. N., Nordby, J. J., and Bell, S., 2009. James, S. N., Nordby, J. J., and Bell, S., eds. Forensic science: an introduction to scientific and investigative techniques. New York: CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, A., 2010. Forensics: stronger scientific scrutiny needed in Britain, Nature 464 (7293) (2010), p. 1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobling, M. A., and Gill, P., 2004. Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis, Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (10) (2004), pp. 739–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, M., Budowle, B., and Sajantila, A., 2010. Welcome to Investigative Genetics, Investigative Genetics 1 (2010), p. 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landsteiner, K., 1900. Zur Kenntnis der antifermentativen, lytischen und agglutinierenden Wirkungen des Blutserums und der Lymphe, Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten 27 (1900), pp. 357–362.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., et al., 2009. Truth machine: the contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, H., and Silva, S., 2009. Informed consent in forensic DNA databases: volunteering, constructions of risk and identity categorization, BioSocieties 4 (2009), pp. 335–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel, J. G., 1866. Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden, Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn 4 Abhandlungen (1866), pp. 3–47, English translation [online]. Available from: http://www.mendelweb.org/ [Accessed 23 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Norton, H. L., et al., 2007. Genetic evidence for the convergent evolution of light skin in Europeans and East Asians, Molecular Biology and Evolution 24 (3) (2007), pp. 710–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, N., Gusmão, L., and Amorim, A., 2010. Likelihood ratios in kinship analysis: contrasting kinship classes, not genealogies, Forensic Science International: Genetics 4 (3) (2010), pp. 218–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, L., et al., 2008. 2006 GEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mtDNA: reflections about interpretation, artefacts and DNA mixtures, Forensic Science International: Genetics 2 (2008), pp. 126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, M. J., and Koehler, J. J., 2005. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science, Science 309 (5736) (2005), pp. 892–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar