Risky profiles: societal dimensions of forensic uses of DNA profiling technologies

References

• Aas, K. F., 2006. “The body does not lie”: identity, risk and trust in technoculture, Crime Media Culture 2 (2) (2006), pp. 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Aas, K. F., 2011. “Crimmigrant” bodies and bona fide travelers: surveillance, citizenship and global governance, Theoretical Criminology 15 (3) (2011), pp. 331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, J. D., 2007. Genetic witness: science, law, and controversy in the making of DNA profiling. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A., 2001. Suspect identities: a history of fingerprinting and criminal identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A., and Dioso-Villa, R., 2007. CSI and its effects: media, juries, and the burden of proof, New England Law Review 41 (3) (2007), pp. 435–470.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A., and Dioso-Villa, R., 2009. Investigating the “CSI effect”: media and litigation crisis in criminal law, Stanford Law Review 61 (6) (2009), pp. 1335–1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, J. Y., 2010. "DNA the Nor-way: black-boxing the evidence and monopolising the key". In: Hindmarsh, R., and Prainsack, B., eds. Genetic suspects: global governance of DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Duster, T., 2004. "Selective arrests, an ever-expanding DNA forensic database, and the specter of an early-twenty-first-century equivalent of phrenology". In: Lazer, D., ed. DNA and the criminal justice system: the technology of justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004. pp. 315–334.
   Google Scholar
• Duster, T., 2006a. Explaining differential trust of DNA forensic technology: grounded assessment or inexplicable paranoia?, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2) (2006a), pp. 293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duster, T., 2006b. The molecular reinscription of race: unanticipated issues in biotechnology and forensic science, Patterns of Prejudice 40 (4–5) (2006b), pp. 427–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duster, T., 2008. DNA dragnets and race: larger social context, history and future, GeneWatch 21 (3–4) (2008), pp. 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., 2011. "Law, technology, and gender relations: following the path of DNA paternity tests in Brazil". In: Browner, C. H., and Sargent, C. F., eds. Reproduction, globalization, and the state: new theoretical and ethnographic perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2011. pp. 138–153.
   Google Scholar
• Frenz, W., 2008. Begrenzung ausländerrechtlicher Maßnahmen durch europäische Grundrechte. Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 28 (11–12), 385–388..
   Google Scholar
• Funk, V., 2007. Ausländerbehörden setzen auf Gentests: Tausende Zuwanderer lassen fürs Amt ihre DNA analysieren – eine gesetzliche Grundlage dafür gibt es nicht, Frankfurter Rundschau (2007), 12 November, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, V., 2009. DNA-Test für Flüchtlinge, Frankfurter Rundschau [online] (2009), Available from: http://www.fr-online.de/home/dna-test-fuer-fluechtlinge/-/1472778/3347042/-/index.html [Accessed 22 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Gaserow, V., 2007. Grenzen dicht für Birmaner: Anwälte: Zwang zum Gentest bei Familiennachzug ist unüberwindbare Hürde, Frankfurter Rundschau (2007), 22 October, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, T., 2001a. Guilty until proven innocent: an analysis of post-Furman capital errors, Criminal Justice Policy Review 12 (2) (2001a), pp. 113–139.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, T., 2001b. Predictors of miscarriages of justice in capital cases, Justice Quarterly 18 (2001b), pp. 949–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T., and Lemke, T., in press. Suspect families: DNA kinship testing in German immigration policy, Sociology 46 (in press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R., and Prainsack, B., 2010. Hindmarsh, R., and Prainsack, B., eds. Genetic suspects: global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1998. The eye of everyman: witnessing DNA in the Simpson trial, Social Studies of Science 28 (5–6) (1998), pp. 713–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 2004. "DNA's identity crisis". In: Lazer, D., ed. DNA and the criminal justice system: the technology of justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004. pp. 337–355.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 2006. Just evidence: the limits of science in the legal process, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2) (2006), pp. 328–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, M., and Schneider, P. M., 2009. DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations, Forensic Science International: Genetics 3 (3) (2009), pp. 154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobilinsky, L., Liotti, T. F., and Oeser-Sweat, J., 2004. DNA: forensic and legal applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B. J., and Schellekens, M., 2008. Forensic DNA phenotyping: regulatory issues, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 9 (2008), pp. 158–202.
   Google Scholar
• Krimsky, S., and Simoncelli, T., 2011. Genetic justice: DNA data banks, criminal investigations, and civil liberties. New York: Columbia University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., 2004. Lazer, D., ed. DNA and the criminal justice system: the technology of justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. and Rödel, M., 2011. Die Nutzung von DNA-Tests in Einwanderungsverfahren: Das Beispiel Deutschland. In: J. Kehr, J. Niewöhner, and J. Vailly, eds. Leben in Gesellschaft. Biomedizin – Politik – Sozialwissenschaften. Bielefeld: Transcript, 143–178..
   Google Scholar
• Leo, R., 2005. Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: developing a criminology of wrongful conviction, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21 (2005), pp. 201–223.
   Google Scholar
• Lofquist, W., 2001. "Whodunit? An examination of the production of wrongful convictions". In: Westervelt, S., and Humphrey, J., eds. Wrongly convicted: perspectives on failed justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2001. pp. 174–198.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., 2003. God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science, Endeavour 27 (2) (2003), pp. 93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., 2004. "“Science above all else”: the inversion of credibility between forensic DNA profiling and fingerprint evidence". In: Edmond, G., ed. Expertise in regulation and law. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2004. pp. 121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., et al., 2008. Truth machine: the contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, H., and Prainsack, B., 2012. Tracing technologies: prisoners' views in the era of CSI. London: Ashgate; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., 2011. Tax agency: DNA-test no proof of paternity, The Local [online] (2011), Available from: http://www.thelocal.se/33698/20110510/ [Accessed 22 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, C., 2006. Forensic identification and criminal justice: forensic science, justice and risk. Cullompton: Willan; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, C., Wilson, T. J., and Williams, R., 2011. Transnational exchange of forensic DNA: viability, legitimacy, and acceptability, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 17 (2011), pp. 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M'charek, A., 2008a. Contrasts and comparisons: three practices of forensic investigation, Comparative Sociology 7 (3) (2008a), pp. 387–412.
   Google Scholar
• M'charek, A., 2008b. Silent witness, articulate collective: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits, Bioethics 22 (9) (2008b), pp. 519–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M'charek, A., Toom, V., and Prainsack, B., 2012. Bracketing off populations does not advance ethical reflection on EVCs: a reply to Kayser and Schneider, Forensic Science International: Genetics (2012), 6 (1), e16–e17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. R., 2008. Whose child is this? Genetic analysis and family reunification immigration in France, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41 (5) (2008), pp. 1503–1534.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., and Lindee, S. M., 1995. The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. New York: WH Freeman; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., 2012. Unchaining research: towards an emancipatory approach to the study of legal processes in criminal law. London, Unpublished working paper..
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., and Kitzberger, M., 2009. DNA behind bars: other ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies, Social Studies of Science 39 (1) (2009), pp. 51–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., and Toom, V., 2010. The Prüm regime: situated dis/empowerment in transnational DNA profile exchange, British Journal of Criminology 50 (6) (2010), pp. 1117–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, G., 2010. “It is not for me to say whether consent was given or not”: forensic medical examiners' construction of “neutral reports” in rape cases, Social and Legal Studies 19 (3) (2010), pp. 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M., 2010. DNA paternity testing, parentage and kinship. Reflections on some tendencies in the UK and in the USA, L'Homme 21 (2) (2010), pp. 101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Semikhodskii, A., 2007. Dealing with DNA evidence: a legal guide. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Swarns, R. L., 2007. DNA tests offer immigrants hope or despair, The New York Times [online] (2007), Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/us/10dna.html [Accessed 22 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Taitz, J., Weekers, J. E.M., and Mosca, D. T., 2002a. DNA and immigration: the ethical ramifications, The Lancet 359 (9308) (2002a), p. 794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taitz, J., Weekers, J. E.M., and Mosca, D. T., 2002b. The last resort: exploring the use of DNA testing for family reunification, Health and Human Rights [online] 6 (1) (2002b), pp. 20–32, Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4065312 [Accessed 22 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Turney, L., 2011. The denial of paternity: pregnancy as a risk to the “pure relationship.”, Sociology 45 (6) (2011), pp. 1110–1125.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, H., 2010. "Base assumptions? Racial aspects of US DNA forensics". In: Hindmarsh, R., and Prainsack, B., eds. Genetic suspects: global governance of DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., 2010. DNA databases and the forensic imaginary. In: R. Hindmarsh and B. Prainsack, eds. Genetic suspects: global governance of DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–152..
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., and Johnson, P., 2008. Genetic policing: the use of DNA in criminal investigations. Cullompton: Willan; 2008.
   Google Scholar