On being a (modern) scientist: risks of public engagement in the UK interspecies embryo debate

References

• Academy of Medical Sciences, 2007. Inter-species embryos: a report by the Academy of Medical Sciences [online]. Available from: http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p48prid51.html [Accessed 8 May 2012]..
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G., 2004. The open: man and animal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., 2007. Hope for nanotechnology: anticipatory knowledge and governance of affect, Area 39 (2007), pp. 156–165, (doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00743.x).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., Allum, N., and Miller, S., 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda, Public Understanding of Science 16 (2007), pp. 79–95, (doi:10.1177/0963662506071287).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., and Jensen, P., 2011. The mobilization of scientists for public engagement, Public Understanding of Science 20 (1) (2011), pp. 3–11, (doi:10.1177/0963662510394457).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow, M., 2009. Preface. In: G. Watts, ed. Hype, hope and hybrids: science, policy and media perspectives of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [online]. AMA/MRC/SMC/Wellcome Trust, 7. Available from: http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p101puid151.html [Accessed 9 May 2012]..
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., et al., 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4) (2006), pp. 285–298, (doi:10.1080/09537320600777002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., 2003. Hope against hype: accountability in biopasts, presents and futures, Science Studies 16 (2) (2003), pp. 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., 2009. Beasting the embryo: the metrics of humanness in the transpecies embryo debate, BioSocieties 4 (2009), pp. 147–163, (doi:10.1017/S1745855209990020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and Michael, M., 2003. An analysis of changing expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1) (2003), pp. 3–18, (doi:10.1080/0953732032000046024).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M., and Neresini, F., 2008. "Science and public participation". In: Hackett, E., et al., eds. The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008. pp. 449–472.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, K., 2007. Empiricist selves and contingent “others”: the performative function of the discourse of scientists working in conditions of controversy, Public Understanding of Science 16 (2007), pp. 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, K., Franklin, S., and Holden, K., 2009. 2009, Public culture as professional science: final report of the SCoPE project (Scientists on public engagement: from communication to deliberation?) [online]. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/37115/ [Accessed 9 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 1999. The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge, Science, Technology, and Society 4 (1) (1999), pp. 81–94, (doi:10.1177/097172189900400106).
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, T., 2005. Popular media, biotechnology, and the “cycle of hype.”, Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy 5 (2) (2005), pp. 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., 1999. Tantalus and aliens: publications, audiences, and the search for gravitational waves, Social Studies of Science 29 (2) (1999), pp. 163–197, (doi:10.1177/030631299029002001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, S., 2009. Vital embryo research driven out of Britain. The Independent, 5th October. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/vital-embryo-research-driven-out-of-britain-1797821.html [Accessed 10 May 2012]..
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, K., 2010. The “citizen scientist”: reflections on the public role of scientists in response to emerging biotechnologies in New Zealand, East Asian Science, Technology, and Society: An International Journal 4 (2010), pp. 503–519.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S., 2008. Constructing communication: talking to scientists about talking to the public, Science Communication 29 (4) (2008), pp. 413–434, (doi:10.1177/1075547008316222).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health, 2006. Review of Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. Cm 6989. London: Stationery Office..
   Google Scholar
• Drayson, Lord, 2009. Drayson says REF will give points for public outreach, Times Higher Education (2009), 9 July. Available from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=407326 [Accessed 9 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L., 1998. The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university-industry-government relations, Minerva 36 (3) (1998), pp. 203–208, (doi:10.1023/A:1004348123030).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S., and Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the post-normal age, Futures 25 (1993), pp. 735–755, (doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G., and Mulkay, M., 1984. Opening Pandora's box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E., 2008. "Politics and publics". In: Hackett, E., et al., eds. The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008. pp. 429–432.
   Google Scholar
• Haddow, G., et al., 2010. Not “human” enough to be human but not “animal” enough to be animal – the case of the HFEA, cybrids and xenotransplantation in the UK, New Genetics and Society 29 (1) (2010), pp. 3–17, (doi:10.1080/14636770903561182).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A., and Martin, P., 2003. The drugs don't work: expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics, Social Studies of Science 33 (3) (2003), pp. 327–364, (doi:10.1177/03063127030333002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S., 2002. Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy, Bioethics 16 (6) (2002), pp. 493–507, (doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee, 2005. Report on human reproductive technologies and the law. Fifth Report of Session 2004–2005, 14 March 2005, London: The Stationery Office..
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee, 2007. Government proposals for the regulations of hybrid and chimera embryos. Fifth report of session 2006–2007. 2007, 5 April 2007. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords, 2008. Human fertilisation and embryology bill. Hansard, 21 January, Vol. 698, Column 38..
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., 2006. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance, Social Studies of Science 36 (2) (2006), pp. 299–320, (doi:10.1177/0306312706053350).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., et al., 2008. Scientists who engage with society perform better academically, Science and Public Policy 35 (7) (2008), pp. 527–541, (doi:10.3152/030234208X329130).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., et al., 2010. Why the medical research council refused Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe support for research on human conception in 1971, Human Reproduction 1 (2010), pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, V., 2003. Diffusion of news about research, Science Communication 25 (1) (2003), pp. 3–13, (doi:10.1177/1075547003255297).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2004. The politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D., and Chadwell, M., 2011. 150 human animal hybrid embryos grown in UK labs: embryos have been produced secretively for three years, Daily Mail (2011), 22 July. Available from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2017818/Embryos-involving-genes-animals-mixed-humans-produced-secretively-past-years.html [Accessed 9 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Master, Z. and Resnik, B., 2011. Hype and public trust in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, Online First, 1st November, 2011..
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2002. Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(3), 357–378..
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., 2001. Public understanding of science at the crossroads, Public Understanding of Science 10 (2001), pp. 115–120, (doi:10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M., 1993. Rhetorics of hope and fear in the great embryo debate, Social Studies of Science 23 (1993), pp. 721–742, (doi:10.1177/030631293023004004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, S., 2010. Interspecies entities and the politics of nature, The Sociological Review 58 (2010), pp. 113–129, (doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01914.x).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, T., 2011. Of course scientists can communicate. Nature, 26 January, Vol 469, 445..
   Google Scholar
• Robert, J. and Baylis, F., 2003. Crossing species boundaries. The American Journal of Bioethics, 3 (3), 1–13..
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and Frewer, L. J., 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms, Science, Technology, & Human Values 30 (2) (2005), pp. 251–290, (doi:10.1177/0162243904271724).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, G., 2012. Meet the press. Nature, 18 November, 468, 465–476..
   Google Scholar
• Savilescu, J., 2008. The new on admixed embryos and the genetic heritage of the living kingdom. Practical Ethics Blog, 21 May. Available from: http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2008/05/the-new-law-on-admixed-embryos-and-the-genetic-heritage-of-the-living-kingdom/ [Accessed 9 May 2012]..
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., 2008. The scientific life: a moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., 1961. Science and government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnert, G., 1995. What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists, Social Studies of Science 25 (1) (1995), pp. 35–55, (doi:10.1177/030631295025001003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., and Rip, A., 1998. The rise of membrane technology: from rhetorics to social reality, Social Studies of Science 28 (2) (1998), pp. 221–254, (doi:10.1177/030631298028002002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, F., 2009. 2009, Showing and telling: the broadcaster's view. In: G. Watts, ed. Hype, hope and hybrids: science, policy and media perspectives of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [online]. AMA/MRC/SMC/Wellcome Trust, 19–20. Available from: http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p101puid151.html [Accessed 9 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Watts, G., 2009. 2009, Hype, hope and hybrids: science, policy and media perspectives of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [online]. AMA/MRC/SMC/Wellcome Trust. Available from: http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p101puid151.html [Accessed 9 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., et al., 2009. UK national newspaper coverage of hybrid embryos: source strategies and struggles. Report produced by the Risk, Science and Media Group at Cardiff University..
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and Willis, R., 2004. See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: DEMOS; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B., 1995. "Public understanding of science". In: Jasanoff, S., et al., eds. Handbook of science and technology studies. 1995, Rev. ed. London: Sage, 361–388.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B., 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: hitting the notes, but missing the music?, Community Genetics 9 (3) (2006), pp. 211–220, (doi:10.1159/000092659).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar