Visibilities, invisibilities and twilight zones at the crime scene in Portugal

References

• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Simon A. 2001. Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, CA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, Susana. 2014. “Os constrangimentos práticos da investigação criminal em Portugal e suas repercussões na aplicabilidade da Base de Dados de ADN.” In Base de Dados genéticos Forenses. Tecnologias de Controlo e Ordem Social, edited by Helena Machado and Helena Moniz, 229–267. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, Susana. 2015. “O tempo que passa é a ciência que foge: a cena do crime numa perspetiva comparativa da atuação das polícias em Portugal e no Reino Unido.” In Ciência, Identificação e Tecnologias de Governo, edited by Claudia Fonseca and Helena Machado, 195–220. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)/CEGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, Susana. 2017. “O aparato forense e os entendimentos socioculturais na investigação criminal em Portugal.” In Genética e Cidadania, edited by Helena Machado and Edições Afrontamento, 87–109. Porto: Afrontamento.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96: 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. “Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2): 328–341. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00038 doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00038.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, Corinna. 2010. “Forensic Evidence: Materializing Bodies.” Materializing Crimes”, European Journal of Women’s Studies, November, 17: 363–377. doi:10.1177/1350506810377699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, Corinna. 2012. “Legal Storytelling in Pre-trial Investigations: Arguing for a Wider Perspective on Forensic Evidence.” New Genetics and Society 31 (3): 299–309. doi:10.1080/14636778.2012.687084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, Corinna. 2016. The Social Life of Forensic Evidence? Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law 49/2008 of 27th August. Diário da República, 1st serie, no. 165, electronic version: http://www.dgpj.mj.pt/sections/noticias/lei-49-2008-de-27de/downloadFile/file/LEI_49.2008.pdf?nocache=1219829003.99 [page consulted on 1st of February 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, Christopher James. 2011. “Policing Markets: The Contested Shaping of Neo-liberal Forensic Science.” British Journal of Criminology, 51 (4): 671–689. doi:10.1093/bjc/azr025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael, Simon Cole, Ruth McNally, and Kathleen Jordan. 2008. Truth Machine. The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Susana Costa. 2013. “Biolegality, the Forensic Imaginary, and Criminal Investigation.” RCCS Annual Review 5: 84–105. doi:10.4000/rccsar.490.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Barbara Prainsack. 2013. Tracing Technologies: Prisoners’ Views in the era of CSI. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, Helena, and Susana Silva. 2010. “Portuguese Forensic DNA Database: Political Enthusiasm, Public Trust and Probable Issues in Future Practice.” In Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing Edited by Richard Hindmarsh and Barbara Prainsack, 218–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Polanyi. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Theodore. 1996. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, Barbara, and Victor Toom. 2013. “Performing Union: The Prűm Decision and the European Dream.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44: 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos, Filipe. 2014. “Making Sense of the Story – the Dialogues Between the Police and Forensic Laboratories in the Construction of DNA Evidence.” New Genetics and Society 33 (2): 181–203. doi:10.1080/14636778.2014.916186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and Anselm Strauss. 1999. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work.” Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing 8 (1–2): 9–30. doi: 10.1023/A:1008651105359
   Google Scholar
• Toom, Victor. 2012. “Forensic DNA Databases in England and the Netherlands: Governance, Structure and Performance Compared.” New Genetics and Society 31 (3): 311–322. doi:10.1080/14636778.2012.687133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Eeden, Claire, Christianne de Poot, and Peter van Koppen. 2016. “Forensic Expectations: Investigating a Crime Scene with Prior Information.” Science and Justice, 56: 475–481. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Robin, and Paul Johnson. 2008. Genetic Policing. The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations. Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, David. 2014a. “Accomplishing Technical and Investigative Expertise in Everyday Crime Scene Investigation.” Phd thesis, University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, David. 2014b. “Practising Crime Scene Investigation: Trace and Contamination in Routine Work.” Policing and Society 24 (4): 443–458. doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.868460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar