Publication Cover
New Genetics and Society
Critical Studies of Contemporary Biosciences
Volume 38, 2019 - Issue 1
4,557
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Social dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a literature review

&
Pages 80-112 | Received 12 Mar 2018, Accepted 15 Oct 2018, Published online: 03 Dec 2018

References

  • Abbate, K. J., P. S. Appelbaum, W. K. Chung, R. Klitzman, C. S. Leu, and R. Ottman. 2014. “Views of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis among Psychiatrists and Neurologists.” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 59 (7–8): 385–392.
  • Abotalib, Z. 2013. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Saudi Arabia.” Bioinformation 9 (8): 388–393.
  • Appel, J. M. 2012. “Toward an Ethical Eugenics: the Case for Mandatory Preimplantation Genetic Selection.” JONA’S Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 14 (1): 7–13.
  • Arribas-Aylon, M., S. Sarangi, and A. Clarke. 2011. Genetic Testing: Accounts of Autonomy, Responsibility and Blame. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bashford, A., and P. Levine, eds. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bayefsky, M. 2015. “The Regulatory Gap for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Hastings Center Report 45 (1): 7–8.
  • Bayefsky, M. 2016. “Comparative Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Policy in Europe and the USA and its Implications for Reproductive Tourism.” Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online 3: 41–47.
  • Bayefsky, M., and B. Jennings. 2015. Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in the United States: The Limits of Unlimited Selection. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1994. “Gesundheit und Verantwortung im Zeitalter der Gentechnologie.” In Riskante Freiheiten, edited by U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim, 316–335. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1996. “Die soziale Konstruktion des Risikos – das Beispiel Pränataldiagnostik.” Soziale Welt 47 (2): 284–296.
  • Bhatia, R. 2010. “Constructing Gender from the Inside Out: Sex-Selection Practices in the United States.” Feminist Studies 36 (2): 260–229.
  • Bhatia, R. 2018a. Gender Before Birth: Sex Selection in a Transnational Context. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Bhatia, R. 2018b. “The Development of Sex-Selective Reproductive Technologies within Fertility, Inc. and the Anticipation of Lifestyle Sex Selection.” In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century, edited by A. Wahlberg and T.M. Gammeltoft, 45–66. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Blumenauer, V., U. Czeromin, D. Fehr, K. Fiedler, C. Gnoth, J. S. Krüssel, M. S. Kupka, A. Ott, and A. Tandler-Schneider. 2017. “D.I.R-Annual 2016 – The German IVF-Registry.” Journal für Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie 14 (6): 272–305.
  • Borght, M. V., and C. Wyns. 2018. “Fertility and Infertility: Definition and Epidemiology.” Clinical Biochemistry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.
  • Borkenhagen, A., E. Brähler, S. Wisch, Y. Stobel-Richter, B. Strauss, and H. Kentenich. 2007. “Attitudes of German Infertile Couples Towards Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Different Uses: A Comparison to International Studies.” Human Reproduction 22 (7): 2051–2057.
  • Brandenburg, K. 2011. “Risk, Parental Autonomy and the Epistemic Divide: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in the Australian Print News Media, 1990–2007.” New Genetics and Society 30 (1): 115–131.
  • Brekke, I., and M. Nadim. 2016. “Gendered Effects of Intensified Care Burdens: Employment and Sickness Absence in Families with Chronically Sick or Disabled Children in Norway.” Work, Employment & Society 31: 391–408. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0950017015625616.
  • Brüninghaus, A. 2011. “Prädiktives genetisches Wissen und individuelle Entscheidung. Eine topologische Skizze.” In Herausforderung Biomedizin. Gesellschaftliche Deutung und soziale Praxis, edited by S. Dickel, M. Franzen, and C. Kehl, 317–332. Bielefeld: Transcript.
  • Byk, C. 2008. “Chapitre 5. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Ambiguous Legal Status for an Ambiguous Medical and Social Practice.” Journal International de Bioéthique 19 (3): 87–104.
  • Campbell, J., and M. Porteous. 2018. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 28 (2): 31–38.
  • Chamayou, S., A. Guglielmino, A. Giambona, S. Siciliano, G. Di Stefano, G. Scibilia, and C. Humeau. (1998). “Attitude of Potential Users in Sicily Towards Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Beta-Thalassaemia and Aneuploidies.” Human Reproduction 13 (7): 1936–1944.
  • Chan, C. L. W., P. S. F. Yip, E. H. Y. Ng, P. C. Ho, C. H. Y. Chan, and J. S. L. Au. 2002. “Gender Selection in China: Its Meaning and Implications.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19 (9): 426–430.
  • Checa, M. A., P. Alonso-Coello, I. Sola, A. Robles, R. Carreras, and J. Balasch. 2009. “IVF/ICSI with or Without Preimplantation Genetic Screening for Aneuploidy in Couples Without Genetic Disorders: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 26 (5): 273–283.
  • Chi, Z., Z. X. Dong, W. X. Lei, Z. W. Jun, L. Lu, and T. Hesketh. 2013. “Changing Gender Preference in China Today: Implications for the Sex Ratio.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 20 (1): 51–68.
  • Clarke, A. 2010. The Sociology of Healthcare. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
  • Couture, V., R. Drouin, A. S. Ponsot, F. Duplain-Laferriere, and C. Bouffard. 2013. “Gender Eugenics Between Medicine, Culture, and Society.” The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10): 57–59.
  • Dahl, E., R. S. Gupta, M. Beutel, Y. Stoebel-Richter, B. Brosig, H.-R. Tinneberg, and T. Jain. 2006. “Preconception Sex Selection Demand and Preferences in the United States.” Fertility and Sterility 85 (2): 468–473.
  • De Rycke, M., F. Belva, V. Goossens, C. Moutou, S. B. SenGupta, J. Traeger-Synodinos, and E. Coonen. 2015. “ESHRE PGD Consortium Data Collection XIII: Cycles from January to December 2010 with Pregnancy Follow-up to October 2011.” Human Reproduction 30 (8): 1763–1789.
  • De Ryke, M., V. Goossens, G. Kokkali, M. Meijer-Hoogeveen, E. Coonen, and C. Moutou. 2017. “ESHRE PGD Consortium Data Collection XIV–XV: Cycles From January 2011 to December 2012 with Pregnancy Follow-up to October 2013.” Human Reproduction 32 (10): 1974–1994.
  • Decruyenaere, M., G. Evers-Kiebooms, A. Boogaerts, K. Philippe, K. Demyttenaere, R. Dom, Wim Vandenberghe, and Jean-Pierre Fryns. 2007. “The Complexity of Reproductive Decision-Making in Asymptomatic Carriers of the Huntington Mutation.” European Journal of Human Genetics 15 (4): 453–462.
  • Dekeuwer, C., and S. Bateman. 2013. “Much More Than a Gene: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Reproductive Choices and Family Life.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2): 231–244.
  • Dennis, C. 2004. “Genetics: Deaf by Design.” Nature 431 (7011): 894–896.
  • Derks-Smeets, I. A., J. J. Gietel-Habets, A. Tibben, V. C. Tjan-Heijnen, M. Meijer-Hoogeveen, J. P. Geraedts, R. van Golde, et al. 2014. “Decision-making on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Prenatal Diagnosis: a Challenge for Couples with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.” Human Reproduction 29 (5): 1103–1112.
  • Dey, I., and R. Chaudhuri. 2009. “Gender Preference and its Implications on Reproductive Behavior of Mothers in a Rural Area of West Bengal.” Indian Journal of Community Medicine 34 (1): 65–67.
  • Douma, K. F., N. K. Aaronson, H. F. Vasen, S. Verhoef, C. M. Gundy, and E. M. Bleiker. 2010. “Attitudes Toward Genetic Testing in Childhood and Reproductive Decision-Making for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.” European Journal of Human Genetics 18 (2): 186–193.
  • Drazba, K. T., M. A. Kelley, and P. E. Hershberger. 2014. “A Qualitative Inquiry of the Financial Concerns of Couples Opting to use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis to Prevent the Transmission of Known Genetic Disorders.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 23 (2): 202–211.
  • Duden, B. 1991. The Woman Beneath the Skin: A Doctor’s Patients in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. 1999. “ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: Preliminary Assessment of Data from January 1997 to September 1998.” Human Reproduction 14 (12): 3138–3148.
  • Farra, C., A. Nassar, T. Arawi, H. Ashkar, C. Monsef, and J. Awwad. 2014. “The Utilization of pre-Implantation Genetic Testing in the Absence of Governance: A Real-Time Experience.” Clinical Genetics 86 (2): 177–180.
  • Ferraretti, A. P., G. Pennings, L. Giaranoli, F. Natali, and M. C. Magli. 2010. “Cross-border Reproductive Care: a Phenomenon Expressing the Controversial Aspects of Reproductive Technologies.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20: 261–266.
  • Finck, C., U. Meister, Y. Stobel-Richter, A. Borkenhagen, and E. Brahler. 2006. “Ambivalent Attitudes Towards pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis in Germany.” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 126 (2): 217–225.
  • Franklin, S. 2013a. “Conception Through a Looking Glass: the Paradox of IVF.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 27 (6): 747–755.
  • Franklin, S. 2013b. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
  • Franklin, S., and C. Roberts. 2006. Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton etc.: Princeton University Press.
  • Freedman, T. G. 1998. “Genetic Susceptibility Testing: Ethical and Social Quandaries.” Health & Social Work 23 (3): 214–222.
  • Gammeltoft, T. M., and A. Wahlberg. 2014. “Selective Reproductive Technologies.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43 (1): 201–216.
  • Geffroy, S., and K. Zerres. 2016. “Präimplantationsdiagnostik im Europavergleich.” Medizinische Genetik 28 (3): 320–325.
  • German Ethics Council. 2011. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Opinion. Berlin: Deutscher Ethikrat.
  • Gianaroli, L., A. P. Ferraretti, M. C. Magli, and S. Sgargi. 2016. “Current Regulatory Arrangements for Assisted Conception Treatment in European Countries.” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 207: 211–213.
  • Gianaroli, L., C. Racowsky, J. Geraedts, M. Cedars, A. Makrigiannakis, and R. A. Lobo. 2012. “Best Practices of ASRM and ESHRE: a Journey Through Reproductive Medicine.” Fertility and Sterility 98 (6): 1380–1394.
  • Gupta, K., and S. M. Freeman. 2013. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Intersex Conditions: Beyond Parental Decision Making.” The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10): 49–51.
  • Habermas, J. 2002. The Future of Human Nature. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Haliburton, R. 2014. Autonomy and the Situated Self: A Challenge to Bioethics. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
  • Hallowell, N. 1999. “Doing the Right Thing: Genetic Risk and Responsibility.” In Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics, edited by P. Conrad and J. Gabe, 97–120. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hank, K., and H.-P. Kohler. 2000. “Gender Preferences for Children in Europe: Empirical Results From 17 FFS Countries.” Demographic Research 2. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.2.1.
  • Haramia, C. 2013. “PGD and Parental Obligations: What Parents Owe to Communities That Do Not Yet Exist.” The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10): 41–42.
  • Haraway, D. 1997. Modest Witness@Second Millenium. FemaleMan Meets Oncomouse. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Harper, J., E. Coonen, M. De Rycke, F. Fiorentino, J. Geraedts, V. Goossens, G. Harton, et al. 2010. “What Next for Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS)? A Position Statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee.” Human Reproduction 25 (4): 821–823.
  • Harper, J. C., E. Coonen, A. H. Handyside, R. M. L. Winston, A. H. N. Hopman, and J. D. A. Delhanty. 1995. “Mosaicism of Autosomes and Sex Chromosomes in Morphologically Normal, Monospermic Preimplantation Human Embryos.” Prenatal Diagnosis 15 (1): 41–49.
  • Harper, J. C., L. Wilton, J. Traeger-Synodinos, V. Goossens, C. Moutou, S. B. SenGupta, Budak T. Pehlivan, et al. 2012. “The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 Years of Data Collection.” Human Reproduction Update 18 (3): 234–247.
  • Hashiloni-Dolev, Y., G. Hirsh-Yechzkel, V. Boyko, T. Wainstock, E. Schiff, and L. Lerner-Geva. 2010. “Attitudes Toward sex Selection: A Survey among Potential Users in Israel.” Prenatal Diagnosis 30 (11): 1019–1025.
  • Hashiloni-Dolev, Y., and S. Shkedi. 2007. “On New Reproductive Technologies and Family Ethics: Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis for Sibling Donor in Israel and Germany.” Social Science & Medicine 65 (10): 2081–2092.
  • Hens, K., W. J. Dondorp, J. P. Geraedts, and G. M. de Wert. 2013. “Comprehensive Embryo Testing. Experts’ Opinions Regarding Future Directions: an Expert Panel Study on Comprehensive Embryo Testing.” Human Reproduction 28 (5): 1418–1425.
  • Hershberger, P. E., and P. F. Pierce. 2010. “Conceptualizing Couples’ Decision Making in PGD: Emerging Cognitive, Emotional, and Moral Dimensions.” Patient Education and Counseling 81 (1): 53–62.
  • Heyen, N. B. 2011. Gendiagnostik als Therapie. Die Behandlung von Unsicherheit in der prädiktiven genetischen Beratung. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.
  • Hollingsworth, L. D. 2005. “Ethical Considerations in Prenatal Sex Selection.” Health & Social Work 30 (2): 126–134.
  • Holm, S. 2004. “Like a Frog in Boiling Water: The Public, the HFEA and Sex Selection.” Health Care Analysis: Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy 12 (1): 27–39.
  • Hurley, K., L. R. Rubin, A. Werner-Lin, M. Sagi, Y. Kemel, R. Stern, Aliza Phillips, et al. 2012. “Incorporating Information Regarding Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Into Discussions Concerning Testing and Risk Management for BRCA1/2 Mutations: A Qualitative Study of Patient Preferences.” Cancer 118 (24): 6270–6277.
  • Järvholm, S., M. Broberg, and A. Thurin-Kjellberg. 2014. “The Choice of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD), a Qualitative Study among Men and Women.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 32 (1): 57–69.
  • Jasanoff, S. 1995. “Product, Process, or Programme: Three Cultures and the Regulation of Biotechnology.” In Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology, edited by M. W. Bauer, 311–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones, B., and C. McMahon. 2003. “Social Representations of Stem Cell Research and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7 (3): 268–275.
  • Kalfoglou, A. L., J. Scott, and K. Hudson. 2005. “PGD Patients’ and Providers’ Attitudes to the Use and Regulation of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11 (4): 486–496.
  • Karatas, J. C., K. Barlow-Stewart, B. Meiser, C. McMahon, K. A. Strong, W. Hill, C. Roberts, and P. Kelly. 2010c. “Psychological Adjustment, Knowledge and Unmet Information Needs in Women Undergoing PGD.” Human Reproduction 25 (6): 1481–1489.
  • Karatas, J. C., K. Barlow-Stewart, K. A. Strong, B. Meiser, C. McMahon, and C. Roberts. 2010a. “Women’s Experience of pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study.” Prenatal Diagnosis 30 (8): 771–777.
  • Karatas, J.C., K. A. Strong, K. Barlow-Stewart, C. McMahon, B. Meiser, and C. Roberts. 2010b. “Psychological Impact of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Review of the Literature.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20 (1): 83–91.
  • Katz, M. G., L. Fitzgerald, A. Bankier, J. Savulescu, and D. S. Cram. 2002. “Issues and Concerns of Couples Presenting for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD).” Prenatal Diagnosis 22 (12): 1117–1122.
  • Kevles, D. J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
  • King, D. S. 1999. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and the ‘New’ Eugenics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2): 176–182.
  • Klitzman, R., W. Chung, K. Marder, A. Shanmugham, L. J. Chin, M. Stark, Cheng-Shiun Leu, and Paul S. Appelbaum. 2013. “Views of Internists Towards Uses of PGD.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 26 (2): 142–147.
  • Klitzman, R., D. Thorne, J. Williamson, W. Chung, and K. Marder. 2007. “Decision-making About Reproductive Choices among Individuals at-Risk for Huntington’s Disease.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 16 (3): 347–362.
  • Knecht, M., M. Klotz, and S. Beck. 2012. “Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Introduction.” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form. Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, edited by M. Knecht, M. Klotz, and S. Beck, 11–26. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.
  • Kollek, R. 2000. Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Embryonenselektion, weibliche Autonomie und Recht. Tübingen und Basel: A. Francke Verlag.
  • Kollek, R., and T. Lemke. 2008. Der medizinische Blick in die Zukunft. Gesellschaftliche Implikationen prädiktiver Gentests. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.
  • Krones, T. 2008. “Pränatal- und Präimplantationsdiagnostik: Diskriminierung von Menschen mit Behinderungen?” In Akzeptanz, Stigmatisierung und Pathologisierung im Kontext der Medizin, edited by D. Groß and G. Buchli, 435–454. Berlin: Med.-Wiss. Verl.-Gesellschaft.
  • Kuhlmann, A. 1999. “Alte Eugenik – neue Eugenik? Die Zukunft der Fortpflanzungskontrolle und die ›Selektion‹.” Frankfurter Rundschau, November 15.
  • Kuhlmann, E., and R. Kollek. 2002. “Konfiguration des Menschen - Entwicklung in den Biowissenschaften und feministischen Theorien.” In Konfiguration des Menschen: Biowissenschaften als Arena der Geschlechterpolitik, edited by E. Kuhlmann and R. Kollek, 7–17. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
  • Lammens, C., E. Bleiker, N. Aaronson, A. Vriends, M. Ausems, M. Jansweijer, A. Wagner, et al. 2009. “Attitude Towards pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis for Hereditary Cancer.” Familial Cancer 8 (4): 457–464.
  • Lavery, S. A., R. Aurell, C. Turner, C. Castello, A. Veiga, P. N. Barri, et al. 2002. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Patients’ Experiences and Attitudes.” Human Reproduction 17 (9): 2464–2467.
  • Leefmann, J., M. Schaper, and S. Schicktanz. 2017. “The Concept of ‘Genetic Responsibility’ and Its Meanings: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Medical Sociology Literature.” Frontiers in Sociology 1. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2016.00018.
  • Lemke, T. 2013. Perspectives on Genetic Discrimination. New York: Routledge.
  • Lemke, T. 2016. “The Tyranny of the Future: G.K. Chesterton and the Paradoxes of Eugenics.” Acta Historiae Medicinae, Stomatologiae, Pharmaciae, Medicinae Veterinariae 35 (1): 50–62.
  • Lemke, T., and J. Rüppel. 2017. Reproduktion und Selektion. Gesellschaftliche Implikationen der Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  • Lopez, J. J., and A. Robertson. 2007. “Ethics or Politics? The Emergence of ELSI Discourse in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 44 (2): 201–218.
  • Malhi, P., G. Raina, D. Malhotra, and J. Jerath. 1999. “Preferences for the Sex of Children and its Implications for Reproductive Behaviour in Urban Himachal Pradesh.” The Journal of Family Welfare 45 (1): 23–30.
  • Mand, C., R. E. Duncan, L. Gillam, V. Collins, and M. B. Delatycki. 2009. “Genetic Selection for Deafness: the Views of Hearing Children of Deaf Adults.” Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (12): 722–728.
  • Mastenbroek, S., and S. Repping. 2014. “Preimplantation Genetic Screening: Back to the Future.” Human Reproduction 29 (9):1846–1850.
  • Mastenbroek, S., M. Twisk, J. van Echten-Arends, B. Sikkema-Raddatz, J. C. Korevaar, H. R. Verhoeve, E. A. Vogel Niels, et al. 2007. “In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening.” New England Journal of Medicine 357 (1): 9–17.
  • Meister, U., C. Finck, Y. Stobel-Richter, G. Schmutzer, and E. Brahler. 2005. “Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Germany.” Human Reproduction 20 (1): 231–238.
  • Middleton, A., J. Hewison, and R. Mueller. 2001. “Prenatal Diagnosis for Inherited Deafness: What is the Potential Demand?” Journal of Genetic Counseling 10 (2): 121–131.
  • Millbank, J. 2017. “Exploring the Ineffable in Women’s Experiences of Relationality with Their Stored IVF Embryos.” Body & Society 23 (4): 95–120.
  • Munné, S., J. Grifo, and D. Wells. 2016. “Mosaicism: ‘Survival of the Fittest’ Versus ‘No Embryo Left Behind’.” Fertility and Sterility 105 (5): 1146–1149.
  • Natesan, S. A., A. J. Bladon, S. Coskun, W. Qubbaj, R. Prates, S. Munne, E. Coonen, et al. 2014. “Genome-wide Karyomapping Accurately Identifies the Inheritance of Single-Gene Defects in Human Preimplantation Embryos in Vitro.” Genetics in Medicine 16 (11): 838–845.
  • Nippert, I. 2006. Präimplantationsdiagnostik - ein Ländervergleich. Die aktuelle Situation hinsichtlich der gesetzlichen Regelung, der Anwendung und der gesellschaftlichen Diskussion in Belgien, Frankreich und Großbritannien. Berlin: Stabsabteilung der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
  • Ormondroyd, E., L. Donnelly, C. Moynihan, C. Savona, E. Bancroft, D. G. Evans, R. Eeles, et al. 2012. “Attitudes to Reproductive Genetic Testing in Women who had a Positive BRCA Test Before Having Children: a Qualitative Analysis.” European Journal of Human Genetics 20 (1): 4–10.
  • Palomba, M. L., G. Monni, R. Lai, G. Cau, G. Olla, and A. Cao. 1994. “Psychological Implications and Acceptability of Preimplantation Diagnosis.” Human Reproduction 9 (2): 360–362.
  • Paul, D. 1998. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature-Nurture Debate. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Pennings, G., C. Autin, W. Decleer, A. Delbaere, L. Delbeke, A. Delvigne, D. De Neubourg, et al. 2009. “Cross-border Reproductive Care in Belgium.” Human Reproduction 24 (12): 3108–3118.
  • Pergament, E. 1991. “Preimplantation Diagnosis: A Patient Perspective.” Prenatal Diagnosis 11 (8): 493–500.
  • Pessach, N., S. Glasser, V. Soskolne, A. Barash, and L. Lerner-Geva. 2014. “The Israeli National Committee for sex Selection by pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis: a Novel Approach (2005–2011).” Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 3 (1): 33.
  • Petersen, T. S. 2005. “Just Diagnosis? Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Injustices to Disabled People.” Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 231–234.
  • Picoult, J. 2005. My Sister’s Keeper: A Novel. New York: Washington Square Press.
  • Quinn, G. P., Susan T. Vadaparampil, Lindsey M. King, Cheryl A. Miree, and Sue Friedman, 2009a. “Conflict between Values and Technology: Perceptions of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis among Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.” Familial Cancer 8 (4): 441–449.
  • Quinn, G. P., S. T. Vadaparampil, B. Bower, S. Friedman, and D. L. Keefe. 2009b. “Decisions and Ethical Issues among BRCA Carriers and the use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Minerva Medica 100 (5): 371–383.
  • Quinn, G. P., T. Pal, D. Murphy, S. T. Vadaparampil, and A. Kumar. 2012. “High-risk Consumers’ Perceptions of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Hereditary Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Genetics in Medicine 14 (2): 191–200.
  • Ray, P. F., A. Munnich, I. Nisand, R. Frydman, M. Vekemans, S. Viville, et al. 2003. “Is Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for ‘Social Sexing’ Desirable in Today’s and Tomorrow’s Society?” Human Reproduction 18 (2): 463–464.
  • Raz, A., C. Schues, N. Wilhelm, and C. Rehmann-Sutter. 2017. “Saving or Subordinating Life? Popular Views in Israel and Germany of Donor Siblings Created Through PGD.” Journal of Medical Humanities. 38 (2): 191–207.
  • Rechitsky, S., A. Kuliev, I. Tur-Kaspa, R. Morris, and A. Verlinsky. 2004. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis with HLA Matching.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 9 (2): 210–221.
  • Reed, L., and P. Saukko, eds. 2010. Governing the Female Body: Gender, Health, and Networks of Power. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Rehmann-Sutter, C. 2011. “Gesellschaftliche, rechtliche und ethische Implikationen der Biomedizin. Zu Rolle und den Aufgan von ELSI-Begleitforschung.” In Herausforderung Biomedizin. Gesellschaftliche Deutung und soziale Praxis, edited by S. Dickel, M. Franzen, and C. Kehl, 49–66. Bielefeld: transcript.
  • Rich, T. A., M. Liu, C. J. Etzel, S. A. Bannon, M. E. Mork, K. Ready, Devki S. Saraiya, et al. 2014. “Comparison of Attitudes Regarding Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis among Patients with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.” Familial Cancer 13 (2): 291–299.
  • Roberts, J. C. 2002. “Customizing Conception: A survey of preimplantation genetic diagnoses and the resulting social, ethical, and legal dilemmas.” Duke Law and Technology Review E1.
  • Roberts, C., and S. Franklin. 2004. “Experiencing New Forms of Genetic Choice: Findings from an Ethnographic Study of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Human Fertility 7 (4): 285–293.
  • Robertson, J. A. 2003. “Is Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for ‘Social Sexing’ Desirable in Today’s and Tomorrow’s Society? – View of the ASRM Ethics Committee.” Human Reproduction 18 (2): 464–464.
  • Robertson, J. A. 2005. “Ethics and the Future of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Ethics, Law and Moral Philosophy of Reproductive Biomedicine 1 (Supp. 1): 97–101.
  • Rödel, M. 2015. Geschlecht im Zeitalter der Reproduktionstechnologien. Natur, Technologie und Körper im Diskurs der Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Bielefeld: transcript.
  • Rödel, M. 2018. “What matters? Natur, Technologie und Geschlecht im Diskurs der Präimplantationsdiagnostik.” Gender – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft 10: 47–62.
  • Rothgang, H., and M. Preuss. 2008. “Ökonomisierung der Sozialpolitik? Neue Begründungsmuster sozialstaatlicher Tätigkeit in der Gesundheits- und Familienpolitik.” In Sozialpolitik. Ökonomisierung und Entgrenzung, edited by A. Evers and R. G. Heinze, 31–48. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Rothman, B. K. 1986. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Rubin, L. R., A. Werner-Lin, M. Sagi, I. Cholst, R. Stern, D. Lilienthal, and K. Hurley, 2014. “‘The BRCA Clock is Ticking!’: Negotiating Medical Concerns and Reproductive Goals in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.” Human Fertility 17 (3): 159–164.
  • Ruhl, L. 1999. “Liberal Governance and Prenatal Care: Risk and Regulation in Pregnancy.” Economy and Society 28 (1): 95–117.
  • Savulescu, J. 2002. “Deaf Lesbians, ‘Designer Disability’ and the Future of Medicine.” British Medical Journal 325 (7367): 771–773.
  • Savulescu, J., and E. Dahl. 2000. “Sex Selection and Preimplantation Diagnosis. A Response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.” Human Reproduction 15 (9): 1879–1880.
  • Scully, J. L., S. Banks, and T. W. Shakespeare. 2006. “Chance, Choice and Control: Lay Debate on Prenatal Social Sex Selection.” Social Science & Medicine 63 (1): 21–31.
  • Seif, R. 2003. “Sex Selection by Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Should it be Carried Out for Social Reasons?” Human Reproduction 18 (2): 461–462.
  • Sensibaugh, C. C., and P. E. Yarab. 1997. “Newlyweds’ Family-Formation Preferences.” The Journal of Psychology 131 (5): 530–540.
  • Sermon, K. 2003. “Sex Selection by Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Should it Be Carried Out for Social Reasons? – A Personal View.” Human Reproduction 18 (2): 462–463.
  • Shenfield, F., J. de Mouzon, G. Pennings, A. P. Ferraretti, A. N. Andersen, G. de Wert, and V. Goossens, 2010. “Cross Border Reproductive Care in Six European Countries.” Human Reproduction 25 (6): 1361–1368.
  • Sills, E. S., and G. D. Palermo. 2002. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Elective Sex Selection, the IVF Market Economy, and the Child – Another Long Day’s Journey Into Night?” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19 (9): 433–437.
  • Snowdon, C., and J. M. Green. 1997. “Preimplantation Diagnosis and Other Reproductive Options: Attitudes of Male and Female Carriers of Recessive Disorders.” Human Reproduction 12 (2): 341–350.
  • Sparrow, R. 2013a. “Gender Eugenics? The Ethics of PGD for Intersex Conditions.” The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10): 29–38.
  • Sparrow, R. 2013b. “Queerin’ the PGD Clinic: Human Enhancement and the Future of Bodily Diversity.” Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2): 177–196.
  • Sureau, C. 1999. “Gender Selection: A Crime Against Humanity or the Exercise of a Fundamental Right?” Human Reproduction 14 (4): 867–868.
  • Testart, J., and B. Sèle. 1995. “Toward an Efficient Medical Eugenics: Is the Desirable Always the Feasible?” Human Reproduction 10: 3086–3090.
  • Thompson, C. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Thornhill, A. R., A. H. Handyside, C. Ottolini, S. A. Natesan, J. Taylor, K. Sage, G. Harton, et al. 2015. “Karyomapping – a Comprehensive Means of Simultaneous Monogenic and Cytogenetic PGD: Comparison with Standard Approaches in Real Time for Marfan Syndrome.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 32 (3): 347–356.
  • Trafimow, D. 2013. “The Ethics of PGD for Intersex Conditions: Problems with the Diversity Argument.” The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (10): 53–55.
  • Tur-Kaspa, I., G. Aljadeff, S. Rechitsky, H. E. Grotjan, and Y. Verlinsky. 2010. “PGD for all Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Couples: Novel Strategy for Preventive Medicine and Cost Analysis.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 21 (2): 186–195.
  • Van Balen, F. 2006. “Attitudes Towards sex Selection in the Western World.” Prenatal Diagnosis 26 (7): 614–618.
  • Van Rij, M. C., M. Gielen, R. Lulofs, J. L. Evers, L. van Osch, N. Muntjewerff, P. M. Geraedts Joep, and E. M. de Die-Smulders Christine. 2011. “Profiles and Motives for PGD: A Prospective Cohort Study of Couples Referred for PGD in the Netherlands.” Human Reproduction 26 (7): 1826–1835.
  • Vanneste, E., T. Voet, C. Le Caignec, M. Ampe, P. Konings, C. Melotte, S. Debrock, et al. 2009. “Chromosome Instability is Common in Human Cleavage-Stage Embryos.” Nature Medicine 15 (5): 577–583.
  • Vaz-de-Macedo, C., and J. Harper. 2017. “A Closer Look at Expanded Carrier Screening from a PGD Perspective.” Human Reproduction 32 (10): 1951–1956.
  • Vergeer, M. M., F. van Balen, and E. Ketting. 1998. “Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis as an Alternative to Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling: Psychosocial and Ethical Aspects.” Patient Education and Counseling 35 (1): 5–13.
  • Verlinsky, Y., J. Cieslak, V. Ivakhnenko, S. Evsikov, G. Wolf, M. White, A. Lifchez, et al. 1999. “Prevention of age-Related Aneuploidies by Polar Body Testing of Oocytes.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 16 (4): 165–169.
  • Wahlberg, A., and T. M. Gammeltoft. 2018. “Introduction: Kinds of Children.” In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century, edited by A. Wahlberg and T. M. Gammeltoft, 1–24. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wang, C. W., and E. C. Hui. 2009. “Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 19: 23–33.
  • Wehling, P. 2014. “Kinderwunsch als Genetisches Risiko? Gesellschaftliche Implikationen Erweiterter Präkonzeptioneller Anlageträgerscreenings.” Medizinische Genetik 26: 411–416.
  • Weingart, P., J. Kroll, and K. Bayertz. 1992. Rasse, Blut und Gene. Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Whittaker, A. 2011. “Reproduction Opportunists in the new Global sex Trade: PGD and non-Medical sex Selection.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23: 609–617.
  • Whittaker, A. 2015. “Media Debates and ‘Ethical Publicity’ on Social sex Selection Through Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Technology in Australia.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 17 (8): 962–976.
  • Wolf, S. M. 1996. Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wüstner, K. 2006. “Technological Development and Society: The Discourse on PGD in Germany.” In New Technologies in Global Societies, edited by P. Law, L. Fortunati, and S. Yang, 75–103. Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Wüstner, K., and U. Heinze. 2007. “Attitudes Towards Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis—A German and Japanese Comparison.” New Genetics and Society 26 (1): 1–27.
  • Zeiler, K. 2004. Reproductive Autonomous Choice – A Cherished Illusion? Reproductive Autonomy Examined in the Context of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (2): 175–183.
  • Zlotogara, J. 2009. “Population Programs for the Detection of Couples at Risk for Severe Monogenic Genetic Diseases.” Human Genetics 126 (2): 247–253.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.