The unexpected and unanticipated announcement of the “world’s first” gene edited babies: breaching, repairing and strengthening community boundaries

References

• Addison, C. 2017. “Spliced: Boundary-Work and the Establishment of Human Gene Therapy.” BioSocieties 12 (2): 257–281. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2016.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology\Building Society, edited by W. Bijker, and J. Law, 205–25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, M., et al. 2020. “Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing.” The CRISPR Journal 3 (5): 332–349. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.man
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anon. 2018a. “Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created ‘World’s First Genetically Edited Babies.” The Telegraph, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2018b. “Chinese Scientist ‘Proud’ of Gene-Editing Trial Despite International Outcry.” The Telegraph, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2018c. “World’s First Gene-Edited Babies Created in China, Claims Scientist.” The Guardian, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B. 2018. “Gene Edited Chinese Twins Usher in the Age Of Unnatural Selection.” The Times, December 2.
   Google Scholar
• Baltimore, D., et al. 2018. On Human Genome Editing II: Statement by the Organizing Committee of the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing (29/11/2018).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., and G. Gaskell (Eds.). 2002. Biotechnology. The making of a global controversy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2019. China Jails ‘Gene-Edited Babies’ Scientist For Three Years. 30/12/2019 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-50944461.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S. 2018. “First Genetically Edited BABIES Created by ‘Dangerous and Irresponsible’ Scientist.” The Mirror, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, R. 2018. “Scientist Claims First Gene-Edited Babies.” The Times, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. 2000. “Organising/Disorganising the Breakthrough Motif: Dolly the Cloned Ewe Meets Astrid the Hybrid pig.” In Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science, edited by N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 87–108. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, C., J. Ding, B. Millam, and G. Barnett. 2020. “The Uproar Over Gene-Edited Babies: A Semantic Network Analysis of CRISPR on Twitter.” Environmental Communication 14 (7): 954–970. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1699135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway, E. 2016. “Dolly at 20: The Inside Story on the World’s Most Famous Sheep.” Nature 534: 604–608. doi: 10.1038/534604a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell, P. 2011. “Boundaries and Risk: Media Framing of Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Older Mothers.” Social Science & Medicine 72 (2): 265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, T., and C. Condit. 2012. “Science and the Sources of Hype.” Public Health Genomics 15 (3-4): 209–217. doi: 10.1159/000336533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekar, C., and J. Kitzinger. 2007. “Science, Patriotism and Discourses of Nation and Culture: Reflections on the South Korean Stem Cell Breakthroughs and Scandals.” New Genetics and Society 26 (3): 289–307. doi: 10.1080/14636770701701790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2019. “The Untold Story of the ‘Circle of Trust’ Behind the World's First Gene-Edited Babies.” Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9400
   Google Scholar
• Cwik, B. 2020. “Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.” The American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8): 7–18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1783024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D. 2019. “China set to Introduce Gene-Editing Regulation Following CRISPR-Baby Furore - The Draft Rules Mean That Anyone who Manipulates Human Genes in Adults or Embryos is Responsible for Adverse Outcomes.” Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01580-1.
   Google Scholar
• Dimond, R., J. Lewis, and G. Thomas. 2021. “Editorial: Themed Issue: Understanding the Technical and Social Landscape of Gene Editing.” New Genetics and Society 40 (4): 361–366. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2004032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimond, R., and N. Stephens. 2018. Legalising Mitochondrial Donation: Enacting Ethical Futures in UK Biomedical Politics. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Doudna, J. A., and E. Charpentier. 2014. “The new Frontier of Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.” Science 346: 6213. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, K. 2017. “‘‘The men who Made the Breakthrough’: How the British Press Represented Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards in 1978.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 4: 59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.07.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feeney, O., et al. 2021. “Ethics, Patents and Genome Editing: A Critical Assessment of Three Options of Technology Governance.” Frontiers in Political Science 3: 731505. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2021.731505
   Google Scholar
• Gabbatiss, J. 2018. “World’s First Genetically Altered Babies Born in China, scientist claims.” The Independent, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 1983: 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
   Google Scholar
• González Santos, S. P., N. Stephens, and R. Dimond. 2018. “Narrating the First “Three-Parent Baby”: The Initial Press Reactions from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Mexico.” Science Communication 40 (4): 419–441. doi: 10.1177/1075547018772312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greely, H. T. 2019. “CRISPR’d Babies: Human Germline Genome Editing in the ‘He Jiankui Affair’.” Journal of Law and Biosciences 6 (1): 111–183. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greely, H. T. 2021. CRISPR People: The Science and Ethics of Editing Humans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J., and S. Miller. 1998. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haran, J., J. Kitzinger, M. McNeil, and K. O'Riordan. 2008. Human Cloning in the Media: From Science Fiction to Science Practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, K., and M. Darnovsky. 2018. “Gene-Edited Babies: No One Has the Moral Warrant to go it Alone.” The Guardian, November 27.
   Google Scholar
• Hesselmann, F., and M. Reinhart. 2019. “Science Means Never Having to say You’re Sorry? Apologies for Scientific Misconduct.” Science Communication 41 (5): 552–579. doi: 10.1177/1075547019860848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iltis, A. S., S. Hoover, and K. R. Matthews. 2021. “Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies: What Does it Mean and What Should it Mean?” Frontiers in Political Science 3: 117. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.730869/full.
   Google Scholar
• Ishii, T. 2017. “Germ Line Genome Editing in Clinics: The Approaches, Objectives and Global Society.” Briefings in Functional Genomics 16 (1): 46–56. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elv053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., B. Hurlbut, and K. Saha. 2015. “CRISPR Democracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation.” Issues in Science and Technology 32 (1): 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., J. B. Hurlbut, and K. Saha. 2019. “Democratic Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing.” The CRISPR Journal 2 (5): 266–271. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen, E. 2010. “Between Credulity and Scepticism: Envisaging the Fourth Estate in 21st-Century Science Journalism.” Media, Culture & Society 32 (4): 615–630. doi: 10.1177/0163443710367695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keach, S. 2018. “EMBRY-NO. Defiant Chinese Scientist Says SECOND Woman Pregnant with ‘Gene-Edited Baby’.” - and More are on the way. The Sun 28/11: 18.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and K. Park. 2013. “Ethical Modernization: Research Misconduct and Research Ethics Reforms in Korea Following the Hwang Affair.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2): 355–380. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9341-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirksey, E. 2021. The Mutant Project: Inside the Global Race to Genetically Modify Humans. New York: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., C. Williams, and L. Henderson. 2000. “Science, media and society: the framing of bioethical debates around embryonic stem cell research between 2000 and 2005.” In New Genetics, New Social Formations, edited by P. Glasner, P. Atkinson, and H. Greenslade, 204–230. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knapton, S. 2018. “Investigation Launched into ‘Monstrous’ Claims Scientist has Genetically Edited Humans.” The Telegraph, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Krimsky, S. 2019. “Breaking the Germline Barrier in a Moral Vacuum.” Accountability in Research 26 (6): 351–368. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1644171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, L. 2018a. “China Orders Inquiry into ‘World’s First Gene-Edited Babies’.” The Guardian, November 27.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, L. 2018b. “Work on Gene-Edited Babies Blatant Violation of the Law, says China.” The Guardian, November 29.
   Google Scholar
• Lander, E. S., et al. 2019. “Adopt a Moratorium on Heritable Genome Editing.” Nature 567: 165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. T., and P. A. Atkinson. 2011. “The Surveillance of Cellular Scientists’ Practice.” BioSocieties 6 (4): 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalatchimy, A., et al. 2021. “Framing and Legitimating EU Legal Regulation of Human Gene-Editing Technologies: Key Facets and Functions of an Imaginary.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 1–30. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, K. 2018. “Don’t Dismiss Gene Editing on Account of One Rogue Case.” The Guardian, December 2.
   Google Scholar
• Marchione, M. 2018. “Chinese Researcher Claims First Gene-Edited Babies.” AP News, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. A., and I. Turkmendag. 2021. “Thinking the Unthinkable: How did Human Germline Genome Editing Become Ethically Acceptable?” New Genetics and Society 4 (40): 384–405.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2022. “Taking Responsibility, Making Irresponsibility: Controversies in Human Gene Editing.” Social Studies of Science 52 (1): 127–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, O. 2017. “Edit Babies’ Genes to Wipe out Inherited Disease, say Scientists.” Times, February 15.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M., and S. De Saille. 2019. “CRISPR in Context: Towards a Socially Responsible Debate on Embryo Editing.” Palgrave Communications 5: 110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. 1993. “Rhetorics of Hope and Fear in the Great Embryo Debate.” Social Studies of Science 23: 721–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAM. 2020. National Academy of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and the Royal Society. Heritable Human Genome Editing. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Medicine. 2017. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics and Governance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. P., C. L. Selin, and C. T. Scott. 2021. “Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (3): 382–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., S. Johnson, and D. D. Clarke. 2003. “THE FIRST ‘DESIGNER BABY’: The Role of Narratives, Clichés and Metaphors in the Year 2000 Media Debate.” Science as Culture 12 (4): 471–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2018. Genome Editing and Human Reproduction: Social and Ethical Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, S. and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion. International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. Stilgoe, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, H. 2018a. “A ‘Monstrous’ Experiment or a Huge Leap For Science? Experts condemn ‘Irresponsible’ Chinese Scientists Who Claim to Have Edited the DNA of Twins to Give the Immunity to HIV.” The Daily Mail, November 26.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, H. 2018b. “Chinese Scientists Who Claims he Made World’s First Gene-Edited Babies Says a SECOND Pregnancy is Underway as Hospital Where he Performed the Scandal-Hit Work Accuses Him of Forgery.” The Daily Mail, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, M. 2012. “The co-production of science, ethics, and emotion.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (6): 579–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. 2008. “Repositioning Documents in Social Research.” Sociology 42 (5): 821–836.
   Google Scholar
• Ranisch, R., and H. J. Ehni. 2020. “Fading red Lines? Bioethics of Germline Genome Editing.” Bioethics 34 (1): 3–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regaldo, A. 2018. “Chinese Scientists are Creating CRISPR Babies.” MIT Technology Review, November 25.
   Google Scholar
• Sataline, S. 2018. “Of Course it’s Not Ethical’: Shock at Gene-Edited Baby Claims.” The Guardian, November 27.
   Google Scholar
• Sataline, S., and I. Sample. 2018. “Scientist in China Defends Human Embryo Gene Editing.” The Guardian, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Science Media Centre. 2022. https://www.sciencemediacentre.org.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, J. L., and C. Rehmann-Suter. 2001. “When Norms Normalize: The Case of Genetic "Enhancement".” Human Gene Therapy 12: 87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 1988. “Understanding the Merton Thesis.” Isis 79 (4): 594–605.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N. J., J. T. Lewis, and P. A. Atkinson. 2013. “Closing the Regulatory Regress: Gmp Accreditation in Stem Cell Laboratories.” Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (3): 345–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, D. 2018. “Chinese Gene-Editing Trial Suspended as Hospital Accuses he Jiankui of forgery.” The Times, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Turkmendag, I. 2018. “It Is Just a “Battery”. Science, Technology.” & Human Values 43 (1): 56–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, A., D. Dong, P. Song, and Z. Jianfeng. 2021. “The Platforming of Human Embryo Editing: Prospecting “Disease Free” Futures.” New Genetics and Society 40 (4): 367–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, M., E. T. Juengst, T. Edwards, et al. 2021. “The View from the Benches: Scientists’ Perspectives on the Uses and Governance of Human Gene-Editing Research.” The CRISPR Journal 4 (4): 609–615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, C., et al. 2019. “Gene-edited Babies: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences’ Response and Action.” The Lancet 393 (10166): 25–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2019. World Health Organization Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing: Report of the Second Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 18–19 March 2019 Geneva, Switzerland, 26–28 August 2019 (No. WHO/SCI/RFH/2019.02).
   Google Scholar
• Wilmut, I., A. E. Schnieke, J. McWhir, et al. 1997. “Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells.” Nature 385: 810–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, S. 2018. “Gene-Editing Babies a Violation of Chinese law, says official.” The Telegraph, November 29.
   Google Scholar