Publication Cover
New Genetics and Society
Critical Studies of Contemporary Biosciences
Volume 43, 2024 - Issue 1
566
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Recoding the gift relationship: views on introducing genomic testing to blood donation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: e2317709 | Received 25 Jul 2023, Accepted 26 Jan 2024, Published online: 16 Feb 2024

References

  • Alessandrini, M., A. Carr, and P. Coghlan. 2007. “Building social capital through blood donation: the social futures project.” ISBT Science Series 2 (2): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2824.2007.00111.x.
  • Atsma, F., I. Veldhuizen, A. Verbeek, W. de Kort, and F. de Vegt. 2011. “Healthy donor effect: its magnitude in health research among blood donors.” Transfusion 51 (8): 1820–1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03055.x.
  • Avent, N. D. 2009. “Large-scale blood group genotyping – clinical implications.” British Journal of Haematology 144 (1): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07285.x.
  • Bednall, T. C., and L. L. Bove. 2011. “Donating blood: a meta-analytic review of self-reported motivators and deterrents.” Transfusion Medicine Reviews 25 (4): 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.04.005.
  • Best, Denisse, Kevin Burrage, Pamela Burrage, Diane Donovan, Shamila Ginige, Tanya Powley, Bevan Thompson, and James Daly. 2022. “Probabilistic mathematical modelling to predict the red cell phenotyped donor panel size.” PLoS One 17 (11): e0276780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276780.
  • Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Burgdorf, K. S., O. B. V. Pedersen, E. Sørensen, L. W. Thørner, H. Hjalgrim, C. Erikstrup, and H. Ullum. 2015. “Extending the gift of donation: blood donor public health studies.” ISBT Science Series 10 (S1): 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/voxs.12119.
  • Busby, H. 2004. “Blood donation for genetic research – What can be learned from donor’s narratives?” In Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA, edited by Richard Tutton, and Oonagh Corrigan, 40–56. London: Routledge.
  • Busby, H. 2006. “Biobanks, bioethics and concepts of donated blood in the UK.” Sociology of Health & Illness 28 (6): 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00546.x.
  • Busby, H. W. 2010. “Trust, nostalgia and narrative accounts of blood banking in England in the 21st century.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 14 (4): 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309359717.
  • Chmielewski, Danielle, Liliana L. Bove, Jing Lei, Ben Neville, and Anish Nagpal. 2012. “A new perspective on the incentive–blood donation relationship: partnership, congruency, and affirmation of competence.” Transfusion 52 (9): 1889–1900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03545.x.
  • Cohn, Simon. 2016. “Blood and the public body: a study of UK blood donation and research participation.” Critical Public Health 26 (1): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2015.1008997.
  • Critchley, C., D. Nicol, M. Otlowski, and D. Chalmers. 2015. “Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intentions across commercial and conventional providers.” Public Understanding of Science 24 (6): 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513519937.
  • Dalsgaard, Steffen. 2007. “‘I DO IT FOR THE CHOCOLATE’.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 8 (1): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672941.
  • Dixit, Sunil K., and Murali Sambasivan. 2018. “A review of the Australian healthcare system: A policy perspective.” SAGE Open Medicine 6), https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118769211.
  • Finch, J. 1987. “The Vignette Technique in Survey Research.” Sociology 21 (1): 105–114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42854387.
  • Finlay, Teresa. 2017. “Testing the NHS: the tensions between personalized and collective medicine produced by personal genomics in the UK.” New Genetics and Society 36 (3): 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2017.1351873.
  • Fleming, J., C. Critchley, M. Otlowski, C. Stewart, and I. Kerridge. 2015. “Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia.” Internal Medicine Journal 45 (12): 1274–1279. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12911.
  • Germain, M., A. Lewin, and R. Bazin. 2023. “Cohort profile: A Québec-Based Plasma Donor Biobank to Study COVID-19 Immunity (PlasCoV).” BMJ Open 13. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068803.
  • Gleadall, Nicholas S., Barbera Veldhuisen, Jeremy Gollub, Adam S. Butterworth, John Ord, Christopher J. Penkett, Tiffany C. Timmer, et al. 2020. “Development and validation of a universal blood donor genotyping platform: a multinational prospective study.” Blood Advances 4 (15): 3495–3506. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001894.
  • Gordon, J., H. Britt, G. C. Miller, J. Henderson, A. Scott, and C. Harrison. 2022. “General Practice Statistics in Australia: Pushing a Round Peg into a Square Hole.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041912.
  • Gorleer, S., P. Bracke, and L. Hustinx. 2023. “Institutionalizing Voluntary Blood Donation: Explaining the Cross-National Variance in the Approval of Paid Blood or Plasma Donation in Europe.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 52 (6): 1753–1777. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221139818.
  • Graf, C., B. Suanet, P. Wiepking, and E.-M. Merz. 2023. “Social norms offer explanation for inconsistent effects of incentives on prosocial behavior.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 211: 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.003.
  • Hansen, T, F Banasik, K Erikstrup. 2019. “DBDS Genomic Cohort, A Prospective and Comprehensive Resource for Integrative and Temporal Analysis of Genetic, Environmental and Lifestyle Factors Affecting Health of Blood Donors.” BMJ Open 9: e028401. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028401.
  • Haw, Jennie, Rachel Thorpe, and Kelly Holloway. 2022. “Blood Collection Agency Messaging to Donors and the Public in Canada and Australia During the Early Days of COVID-19.” Frontiers in Communication 6.
  • Healy, K. 2000. “Embedded Altruism: Blood Collection Regimes and the European Union's Donor Population.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (6): 1633–1657. https://doi.org/10.1086/210468.
  • Healy, Kieran. 2006. Last best gifts: Altruism and the market for human blood and organs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hirani, R., S. Tarafdar, P. Mondy, T. Powley, J. Daly, and D. O. Irving. 2021. “Understanding the demand for phenotyped red blood cell units and requests to perform molecular red blood cell typing for Australian patients.” Transfusion and Apheresis Science 60 (1): 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2020.102968.
  • Ji, Y., R. Flower, C. Hyland, N. Saiepour, and H. Faddy. 2018. “Genetic factors associated with iron storage in Australian blood donors.” Blood Transfusion 16 (2): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.2450/2016.0138-16.
  • Karki, Surendra, Carley N. Gemelli, Tanya E. Davison, Barbara M. Masser, Denese C. Marks, Katy Bell, Bette Liu, Andrew Hayen, Katja van den Hurk, and David O. Irving. 2021. “Willingness of blood donors in Australia to provide additional data and blood sample for health research.” Transfusion 61 (10): 2855–2861. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16629.
  • Kragh-Furbo, M., and R. Tutton. 2017. “Spitting images: remaking saliva as a promissory substance.” New Genetics and Society 36 (2): 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2017.1320943.
  • Leipnitz, S., M. de Vries, M. Clement, and N. Mazar. 2018. “Providing health checks as incentives to retain blood donors — Evidence from two field experiments.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 35 (4): 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.08.004.
  • Liamputtong, P. 2012. “Focus Groups.” In Qualitative research methods, Oxford University Press Australia and New Zealand. ProQuest Ebook Central. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/latrobe/detail.action?docID = 4882799.
  • Luken, J. S., S. P. Ritsema, M. M. Van der Wal, C. E. van der Schoot, M. de Haas Eaja Rouwette, and M. P. Janssen. 2022. “Mapping anticipated advantages and disadvantages of implementation of extensive donor genotyping: A focus group approach.” Transfusion Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12887.
  • Malakar, Yuwan, Justine Lacey, Natalie A. Twine, and Denis C. Bauer. 2023. “Applying a risk governance approach to examine how professionals perceive the benefits and risks of clinical genomics in Australian healthcare.” New Genetics and Society 42 (1): e2192472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2023.2192472.
  • Masser, Barbara M, Melissa K Hyde, and Eamonn Ferguson. 2020. “Exploring predictors of Australian community members' blood donation intentions and blood donation–related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Transfusion 60 (12): 2907–2917. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16067.
  • Middleton, Anna, Richard Milne, Mohamed A. Almarri, Shamim Anwer, Jerome Atutornu, Elena E. Baranova, Paul Bevan, et al. 2020. “Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data?” The American Journal of Human Genetics 107 (4): 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.023.
  • Milne, Richard, Katherine I. Morley, Mohamed A. Almarri, Jerome Atutornu, Elena E. Baranova, Paul Bevan, Maria Cerezo, et al. 2022. “Return of genomic results does not motivate intent to participate in research for all: Perspectives across 22 countries.” Genetics in Medicine 24 (5): 1120–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.002.
  • Mitchell, R. 2010. “Blood banks, biobanks, and the ethics of donation.” Transfusion 50 (9): 1866–1869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02812.x.
  • Mitchell, R., and C. Waldby. 2010. “National Biobanks: Clinical Labor, Risk Production, and the Creation of Biovalue.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (3): 330–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909340267.
  • Morgan, David L. 2012. “Focus groups and social interaction.” In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Naing, S., R. Thorpe, K. Jensen, B. Masser, and N. Guerin. 2022. “‘Stay at home and limit contact’: The impact of stay-at-home advice on the behavior of Australian donors aged 70 and over in the first year of the pandemic.” Transfusion 62 (12): 2568–2576. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17120.
  • Petersen, Alan. 2022. “Introduction. The new genetics, health, and ‘the public’.” In The New Genetics and the Public's Health, edited by Robin Bunton, and Alan Petersen. Routledge.
  • Petersen, Alan, and Deborah Lupton. 1997. “Introduction.” In The New Public Health: Discourses, Knowledges, Strategies, ix–xvi. SAGE Publications.
  • Pfeffer, N., and S. Laws. 2006. “‘It's only a blood test’: What people know and think about venepuncture and blood.” Social Science & Medicine 62 (12): 3011–3023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.050.
  • Prainsack, Barbara. 2017. “Setting the Stage for Personalized Medicine.” In Personalized Medicine: Empowered Patients in the 21st Century? NYU Press.
  • Raivola, Vera, Karoliina Snell, Ilpo Helén, and Jukka Partanen. 2019. “Attitudes of blood donors to their sample and data donation for biobanking.” European Journal of Human Genetics 27 (11): 1659–1667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0434-1.
  • Reardon, Jenny. 2022. “The pathos of precision.” New Genetics and Society 41 (3): 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2022.2115352.
  • Rice, M. S., B. S. Custer, D. A. Hindes, N. V. Hirschler, K. A. Nguyen, M. P. Busch, and E. L. Murphy. 2010. “Genetic research in the blood bank: acceptability to Northern California donors.” Transfusion 50 (9): 1951–1958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02741.x.
  • Rottenberg, Yakir, Vered Yahalom, Eilat Shinar, Micha Barchana, Bella Adler, and Ora Paltiel. 2009. “Blood donors with positive direct antiglobulin tests are at increased risk for cancer.” Transfusion 49 (5): 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02054.x.
  • Ruckenstein, Minna, and Natasha Dow Schüll. 2017. “The Datafication of Health.” Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1): 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041244.
  • Schwandt, Thomas A. 1998. “Constructivist, Interpretvist approaches to human inquiry.” In The landscape of qualitative research, edited by Y. S. Lincoln, and N. K. Denzin, 221–259. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Scott, E. A., K. S. Schlumpf, S. M. Mathew, A. E. Mast, M. P. Busch, J. L. Gottschall and Lung National Heart, and Study Blood Institute Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor, II. 2010. “Biospecimen repositories: are blood donors willing to participate?” Transfusion 50 (9): 1943–1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02667.x.
  • Snell, K., H. Tarkkala, and A. Tupasela. 2021. “A solidarity paradox - welfare state data in global health data economy.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 27 (5): 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593211069320.
  • Terkildsen, Morten Deleuran, Viola Burau, Ulla Væggemose, and Nina Konstantin Nissen. 2020. “The welfare state driving “me” and “we” medicine – a critical discourse analysis.” New Genetics and Society 39 (4): 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2020.1755635.
  • Thorpe, R., K. Jensen, B. Masser, V. Raivola, A. Kakkos, K. von Wielligh, and J. Wong. 2023. “Donor and non-donor perspectives on receiving information from routine genomic testing of donor blood.” Transfusion 63 (2): 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17215.
  • Timmer, T., M. Tanck, C. Penkett, K. Stirrups, N. Gleadall, W. de Kort, E. van der Schoot, and K. van den Hurk. 2021. “Genetic determinants of ferritin, haemoglobin levels and haemoglobin trajectories: results from Donor InSight.” Vox Sanguinis 116 (7): 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13066.
  • Titmuss, Richard M. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From human blood to social policy. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Toivonen, J., Y. Koski, E. Turkulainen, F. Prinsze, P. Della Briotta Parolo, and M. Heinonen. 2022. “Prediction and Impact of Personalized Donation Intervals.” Vox Sang 117: 504–512.
  • Tordon, B., C. Montemayor, G. Clarke, S. F. O'Brien, and M. Goldman. 2023. “Use of selective phenotyping and genotyping to identify rare blood donors in Canada.” Vox Sanguinis 118 (5): 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13419.
  • Tupasela, A. 2011. “From gift to waste: changing policies in biobanking practices.” Science and Public Policy 38 (7): 510–520. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315268056.
  • Tutton, R., and B. Prainsack. 2011. “Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research.” Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (7): 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.
  • Van Dyke, N., K. Chell, B. Masser, S. P. Kruse, C. N. Gemelli, K. Jensen, and T. E. Davison. 2020. “Thank you for donating: a survey of Australian donors' and nondonors' orientations toward noncash incentives for blood donation.” Transfusion 60 (7): 1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15806.
  • Vears, D. F., J T. Minion, S J. Roberts, J Cummings, M. Machirori, M Blell, I Budin-Ljøsne, et al. 2021. “Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.” PLoS One 16 (11): e0258646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258646.