Are we ready for the genomic era? Insights from judges and lawyers

References

• Amelung, Nina, Rafaela Granja, and Helena Machado. 2020. “Communicating Forensic Genetics: “Enthusiastic” Publics and the Management of Expectations.” In Exploring Science Communication: A Science and Technology Studies Approach, 209–226. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529721256
   Google Scholar
• Amsterdam, Anthony G., and Jerome S. Bruner. 2011. Minding the Law. 1. paperback ed. 2. print., [Nachdr.]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Lori B., Maxwell J. Mehlman, and Mark A Rothstein, eds. 2015. Genetics: Ethics, Law and Policy. 4th ed. St Paul, MN: West Academic. https://faculty.westacademic.com/Book/Detail?id=31475.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, Lisa G., Teneille R. Brown, and James Tabery. 2012. “The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges’ Sentencing of Psychopaths?” Science 337 (6096): 846–849. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, Donald B., Lisa M. Gehtland, Megan A. Lewis, Holly Peay, Melissa Raspa, Scott M. Shone, Jennifer L. Taylor, et al. 2019. “Early Check: Translational Science at the Intersection of Public Health and Newborn Screening.” BMC Pediatrics 19 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1606-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berryessa, Colleen M. 2016. “‘Judges’ Views on Evidence of Genetic Contributions to Mental Disorders in Court.” The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 27 (4): 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1173718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryessa, Colleen M. 2019. “Judicial Stereotyping Associated with Genetic Essentialist Biases toward Mental Disorders and Potential Negative Effects on Sentencing.” Law & Society Review 53 (1): 202–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosley, Katrine S., Michael Botchan, Annelien L. Bredenoord, Dana Carroll, R. Alta Charo, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Ron Cohen, et al. 2015. “CRISPR Germline Engineering—The Community Speaks.” Nature Biotechnology 33 (5): 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, Keith, Fergus Douds, Yasmin Simpson and Scotland, and Scottish Government. 2011. People with Learning Disabilities and the Criminal Justice System. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/03/21142925/0.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Robert, Maxim Likhanov, Fatos Selita, Emily Smith-Woolley, and Yulia Kovas. 2017. “Genetic Literacy and Attitudes Survey (Iglas): International Population-Wide Assessment Instrument.” European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences 45–66. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.12.6.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Robert, Maxim Likhanov, Fatos Selita, Ilya Zakharov, Emily Smith-Woolley, and Yulia Kovas. 2019. “New Literacy Challenge for the Twenty-First Century: Genetic Knowledge Is Poor Even among Well Educated.” Journal of Community Genetics 10 (1): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0363-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, Carolyn Riley, Kripa Sanjay Mehta, Brendan Parent, and Arthur L. Caplan. 2020. “Genetic Discrimination: Emerging Ethical Challenges in the Context of Advancing Technology.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil Justice Council. 2011. “Access to Justice for Litigants in Person (or Self-Represented Litigants).” https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/report-on-access-to-justice-for-litigants-in-person-nov2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Crown Prosecution Service. 2018. “Data Protection Act 2018 - Criminal Offences.” https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/data-protection-act-2018-criminal-offences.
   Google Scholar
• Cyentia Institute. 2016. “Mining for Database Gold: Findings from 2016 Breach Level Index.” https://cyentia.com/library-item/2016-mining-for-database-gold-findings-from-2016-breach-level-index/.
   Google Scholar
• Data Protection Act 2018. n.d. Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament. Accessed September 11, 2021. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted.
   Google Scholar
• Fenn, Jessy, Chee-Seng Tan, and Sanju George. 2020. “Development, Validation and Translation of Psychological Tests.” BJPsych Advances 26 (5): 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2020.33.
   Google Scholar
• Furrow, Barry, Thomas Greaney, Sandra Johnson, Timothy J. Stoltzfus, and Robert L. Schwartz. 2013. Health Law, Cases, Materials and Problems. 7th ed. Minnesota: West Academic Publishing. https://faculty.westacademic.com/Book/Detail?id=2028.
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, Johannes, Harald Dressing, and Peer Briken. 2015. “Neurogenetic Evidence in the Courtroom: A Randomised Controlled Trial with German Judges.” Journal of Medical Genetics 52 (11): 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
   Google Scholar
• Godard, Béatrice, Leo ten Kate, Gerry Evers-Kiebooms, and Ségolène Aymé. 2003. “Population Genetic Screening Programmes: Principles, Techniques, Practices, and Policies.” European Journal of Human Genetics 11 (S2): S49–S87. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Government Office for Science. 2022a. “Genomics Beyond Health.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/genomics-beyond-health.
   Google Scholar
• Government Office for Science. 2022b. “Genomics Beyond Health.” Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/genomics-beyond-health.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. 2006. “What Price Privacy? The Unlawful Trade in Confidential Personal Information.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/21_07_11_icomotorman.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. 2018. “Enforcement Action.” Government. ICO. 10 September 2018. https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/.
   Google Scholar
• Jacko, Anastasia M., Andrea L. Durst, Karen L. Niemchick, Stephen M. Modell, and Amy H. Ponte. 2023. “Public Health Genetics: Surveying Preparedness for the Next Generation of Public Health Professionals.” Genes 14 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, Annie, and Gregory Radick. 2017. “Genetic Determinism in the Genetics Curriculum: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Mendelian and Weldonian Emphases.” Science & Education 26 (10): 1261–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9900-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovas, Yulia, and Fatos Selita. 2021. “DNA: The Greatest Text of All.” In Oedipus Rex in the Genomic Era: Human Behaviour, Law and Society, edited by Yulia Kovas and Fatos Selita, 111–172. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-96048-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Lintern, Shaun. 2021. “Thousands of Patients Hit by NHS Data Breaches.” The Independent, July 3, 2021, sec. News. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/data-nhs-patient-breaches-privacy-b1877154.html.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid-Valero, Juan J., Robert Chapman, Evangelina Bailo, Juan R. Ordoñana, Fatos Selita, Yulia Kovas, and Alice M. Gregory. 2021. “What Do People Know About the Heritability of Sleep?” Behavior Genetics 51 (2): 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-021-10041-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaughey, Tristan, Paul G. Sanfilippo, George E.C. Gooden, David M. Budden, Li Fan, Eva Fenwick, Gwyneth Rees, et al. 2016. “A Global Social Media Survey of Attitudes to Human Genome Editing.” Cell Stem Cell 18 (5): 569–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrick, Rob. 2017. “GPs Urgently Examine 173 Cases of Patients Who May Have Been Harmed after Massive NHS Data Loss.” February 27, 2017. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nhs-data-loss-gps-examine-cases-jeremy-hunt-health-department-a7602531.html.
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, Richard, Mark Sefton, Great Britain, and Department for Constitutional Affairs. 2005. Litigants in Person: Unrepresented Litigants in First Instance Proceedings. London: DCA Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Naddaf, Miryam. 2022. “Researchers Welcome $3.5-Million Haemophilia Gene Therapy — but Questions Remain.” Nature 612 (7940): 388–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04327-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, Nalini M., Caitlin Q. Weber, Shelley V. Goldman, Dennis L. Schatz, Sue Allen, and Rebecca Menlove. 2019. “Beyond the Deficit Model: The Ambassador Approach to Public Engagement.” BioScience 69 (4): 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Human Gene Editing: Scientific, Medical, and Ethical Considerations, National Academy of Medicine, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24623.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Meaghan, Sarah Perrault, Jodi Halpern, Lisa Ikemoto, Mark Yarborough, and UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences. 2015. ““Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polderman, Tinca J. C., Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, and Danielle Posthuma. 2015. “Meta-Analysis of the Heritability of Human Traits Based on Fifty Years of Twin Studies.” Nature Genetics 47 (7): 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, Matilda, Juan Jose Valero, Fatos Selita, Yulia Kovas, and Alice M. Gregory. in press. “What the Public Believe about the Aetiology of Anxiety Disorders and Why It Matters.”
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Jonathan. 2021. “Genetic Information, Insurance and a Pluralistic Approach to Justice.” Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7): 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raposo, Vera. 2019. “The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science.” JBRA Assisted Reproduction 23 (3): 197–199. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, Hannah. 2019. “Genetic Bodily Fragments and Relational Embodiment: Judicial Rhetoric about “Biological Truth” in Paternity Disputes in the Family Courts.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 45 (1): 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2019.1646111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Rincon, Daniela, Sarah Parkinson, Lucy Hocking, Hamish Evans, Emma Hudson, and Katherine I. Morley. 2022. “Assessing the Impact of Developments in Genetic Testing on Insurers’ Risk Exposure.” Rand Health Quarterly 9 (4): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos. 2018. “Unrepresented Litigants in Modern Courts – Ordeal by Combat.” Legal Issues Journal 6 (1): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos. 2019a. “Improving Access to Justice: Community-Based Solutions.” Asian Journal of Legal Education 6 (1–2): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322005819855863.
   Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos. 2019b. “Genetic Data Misuse: Risk to Fundamental Human Rights in Developed Economies.” Legal Issues Journal 7 (1): 53–95. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11423724.
   Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos. 2020. “Justice in the Genomic and Digital Era: A “Different World” Requiring “Different Law”.” Legal Issues Journal 8 (1): 55–70. https://www.legalissuesjournal.com/article/814/.
   Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos, Robert Chapman, and Yulia Kovas. 2019. “To Use or Not to Use: No Consensus on Whether and How to Apply Genetic Information in the Justice System.” Behavioral Sciences 9 (12): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9120149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos, Robert Chapman, Yulia Kovas, Vanessa Smereczynska, Maxim Likhanov, and Teemu Toivainen. 2023. “Consensus Too Soon: Judges’ and Lawyers’ Views on Genetic Information Use.” New Genetics and Society 42 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2023.2197583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos, and Yulia Kovas. 2018. “Genes and Gini: What Inequality Means for Heritability.” Journal of Biosocial Science 51 (1): 18–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932017000645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selita, Fatos, Vanessa Smereczynska, Robert Chapman, Teemu Toivainen, and Yulia Kovas. 2020. “Judging in the Genomic Era: Judges’ Genetic Knowledge, Confidence and Need for Training.” European Journal of Human Genetics 28: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0650-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, Nina R., Janet S. Carpenter, Larisa H. Cavallari, Laura J. Damschroder, Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff, Joshua C. Denny, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, et al. 2017. “Challenges and Strategies for Implementing Genomic Services in Diverse Settings: Experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) Network.” BMC Medical Genomics 10 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0273-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Supreme Court of Minnesota. 2011a. Bearder v. State JUSTIA. Supreme Court of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of Minnesota. 2011b. Bearder v. State FindLaw. Supreme Court of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health. 2022. “Code on Genetic Testing and Insurance: 3-Year Review 2022.” Corporate report. UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance-3-year-review-2022/code-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance-3-year-review-2022.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. n.d. “Equality and Diversity.” GOV.UK. Accessed 29 April 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/equality-and-diversity.
   Google Scholar
• WiredGov. 2018. “Medical Centre Fined for Abandoning Sensitive Information in Empty Building | Information Commissioner’s Office.” May 25, 2018. https://www.wired-gov.net/wg/news.nsf/articles/Medical+centre+fined+for+abandoning+sensitive+information+in+empty+building+25052018162000?open.
   Google Scholar