Individual differences in human–machine trust: A multi-study look at the perfect automation schema

References

• Alarcon, G. M., J. B. Lyons, and J. Christensen. 2016. “The Effect of Propensity to Trust and Familiarity on Perceptions of Trustworthiness over Time.” Personality and Individual Differences 94: 309–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbage, C. 2013. Cockpit automation: Difference Engine: Crash program? The Economist. Retrieved online on 16 March 2017, Available at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/08/cockpit-automation
   Google Scholar
• Barber, D., L. Davis, D. Nicholson, J. Y. C. Chen, and N. Finkelstein. 2008. “The Mixed Initiative Experimental (MIX) Testbed for Human Robot Interactions with Varied Levels of Automation.” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Army Science Conference, December 1–4, ADA505701.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., B. A. Scott, and J. A. LePine. 2007. “Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 909–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., L. G. Pierce, H. P. Beck, and L. A. Dawe. 2002. “The Perceived Utility of Human and Automated Aids in a Visual Detection Task.” Human Factors 44: 79–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., and S. E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Guznov, S., J. B. Lyons, A. Nelson, and M. Wooley. 2016. “The Effects of Automation Error Types on Operators Trust and Reliance.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9740: 116–124.
   Google Scholar
• Guznov, S., A. Nelson, J. B. Lyons, and D. Dycus. 2015. “The Effects of Automation Reliability and Multi-tasking on Trust and Reliance in a Simulated Unmanned System Control Task.” Proceedings of 17th Human-Computer Interaction Conference, 616–621.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. C. Chen, E. J. de Visser, and R. Parasuraman. 2011. “A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.” Human Factors 53 (5): 517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, N. T., G. G. Sadler, L. C. Hoffmann, J. B. Lyons, W. E. Fergueson, and M. Wilkins. 2017. “A Longitudinal Field Study of Auto-GCAS Acceptance and Trust: First Year Results and Implications.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 11: 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., and M. Bashir. 2015. “Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors that Influence Trust.” Human Factors 57: 407–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. Lee, and K. A. See. 2004. “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance.” Human Factors 46: 50–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z., E. M. Whitener, and R. Cross. 2006. “Perceived Trustworthiness of Knowledge Sources: The Moderating Impact of Relationship Length.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (5): 1163–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., T. J. Hess, and J. S. Valacich. 2008. “Why Do We Trust New Technology? A Study of Initial Trust Formation with Organizational Information Systems.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17: 39–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B., N. T. Ho, E. Fergueson, G. Sadler, S. Cals, C. Richardson, and M. Wilkins. 2016a. “Trust of an Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance Technology: A Fighter Pilot Perspective.” Military Psychology 28 (4): 271–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B., N. T. Ho, K. Koltai, G. Masequesmay, M. Skoog, A. Cacanindin, and W. W. Johnson. 2016b. “A Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System: Test Pilots.” Ergonomics in Design 24: 9–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B., N. T. Ho, A. L. Van Abel, L. C. Hoffmann, W. E. Fergueson, G. G. Sadler, M. A. Grigsby, and A. C. Burns. 2017. Exploring Trust Barriers to Future Autonomy: A Qualitative Look. Proceedings of the Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference. Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B., and C. K. Stokes. 2012. “Human-Human Reliance in the Context of Automation.” Human Factors, 54 (1): 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, P., D. Wiegmann, and F. Lacson. 2007. “Automation Failures on Tasks Easily Performed by Operators Undermine Trust in Automated Aids.” Human Factors 48: 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrated Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20: 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., and D. R. Ilgen. 2008. “Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions.” Human Factors 50: 194–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., J. LaChapell, and D. Lee. 2012. The Perfect Automation Schema: Measure Development and Validation. Technical report submitted to the Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., J. LaChapell, and D. Lee. 2013. Continuous Calibration of Trust in Automated Systems-phase 2. Technical report submitted to the Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., J. L. Unnerstall, D. Lee, and K. Huber. 2015. “Measuring Individual Differences in the Perfect Automation Schema.” Human Factors 57, 740–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. 1977. “The Interaction of Person and Situation.” In Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology, edited by D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler, 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, B. M. 1994. Trust in Automation: Part I. Theoretical Issues in the Study of Trust and Human Intervention in Automated Systems. Ergonomics 37(11): 1905–1922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, B. 2011. “Designing Embodied cues for Dialogue with Robots.” AI Magazine 32: 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnasch, L., C. D. Wickens, H. Li, and D. Manzey. 2014. “Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis.” Human Factors 56: 476–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ososky, S., D. Schuster, E. Phillips, and F. Jentsch. 2013. Building Appropriate Trust in Human-robot Teams. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Trust in Autonomous Systems 60–65. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, R., E. Rovira, A. C. McLaughlin, and N. Baldwin. 2017. “Does Domain of Technology Impact User Trust? Investigating Trust in Automation Across Different Consumer-oriented Domains in Young Adults, Military, and Older Adults.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 18: 199–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and D. H. Manzey. 2010. “Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration.” Human Factors 52 (3): 381–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and V. Riley. 1997. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors 39 (2): 230–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., T. B. Sheridan, and Wickens, C.D. (2000). “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 30: 286–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., E. Visser, M. Ming-Kuan Lin, and P. M. Greenwood. 2012. “Dopamine Beta Hydroxylase Genotype Identifies Individuals Less Susceptible to Bias in Computer-Assisted Decision Making.” PLoS One 7: e39675, 1-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, R. E. 2017. “Intuitive Cognition and Models of Human-automation Interaction.” Human Factors 59: 101–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop, V. L., A. Shrewsbury, and F. T. Durso. 2015. “Individual Differences in the Calibration of Trust in Automation.” Human Factors 57: 545–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinette, P., R. Allen, W. Li, A. Howard, and A. R. Wagner. 2016. Overtrust of Robots in Emergency Evacuation Scenarios. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Rovira, E., R. Pak, and A. C. McLaughlin. 2017. “Effects of Individual Differences in Working Memory on Performance and Trust with Various Degrees of Automation.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 18 (6): 573–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem, M., G. Lakotos, F. Amirabdollahian, and K. Dautenhahn. 2015. Would you trust a (faulty) robot?: Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, J., W. A. Rogers, A. D. Fisk, and E. Rovira. 2014. “Understanding Reliance on Automation: Effects of Error Types, Error Distribution, Age, and Experience.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 15 (2): 134–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauer, J., and A. Chavaillaz. 2018. “How Operators Make Use of Wide-Choice Adaptable Automation: Observations from a Series of Experimental Studies.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 19 (2): 135–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. E., J. Y. Chen, J. L. Szalma, and P. A. Hancock. 2016. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems. Human Factors 58 (3): 377–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., J. Heafner, and N. Epley. 2014. “The Mind in the Machine: Anthropomorphism Increases Trust in an Autonomous Vehicle.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52: 113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar