References
- GLOBAL INTERNET STATISTICS, 2002, URL: www.global-reach.biz/globstats/index.php3 [accessed 2002 Nov 16].
- PEW INTERNET & AMERICAN LIFE, 2002, URL:. www.pewinternet.org/releases/release.asp?id=10 [accessed 2002 Nov 17].
- SILBERG, W. M., LUNDBERG, G. D. and MUSACCHIO, R. A., 1997, Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA, 277, 1244– 1245.
- EDITORIAL, 1997, The web of information inequality. Lancet, 349, 1781.
- IMPICCIATORE, P., PANDOLFINI, C., CASELLA, N. and BONATI, M., 1997, Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. British Medical Journal, 314, 1875– 1879.
- MCCLUNG, H. J., MURRAY, R. D. and HEITLINGER, L. A., 1998, The Internet as a source for current patient information. Pediatrics, 101 (6),E2. (URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/ 101/6/e2 [accessed 2002 Nov 17]).
- RISK, A. and DZENOWAGIS, J., 2001, Review of internet health information quality initiatives. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(4), e28 (URL: http://www.jmir.org/2001/4/e28/ [accessed 2002 Nov 17]).
- HERNA´ NDEZ-BORGES, A.A., MACI´AS-CERVI, P., GASPAR-GUARDADO,M. A., TORRES-A´ LVAREZ DE ARCAYA, M. L., RUIZ-RABAZA, A. and JIME´NEZ-SOSA, A., 1999, Can examination of WWW usage statistics and other indirect quality indicators help to distinguish the relative quality of medical websites? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 1(1), e1 (URL: http://www.jmir.org/1999/1/e1/ [accessed 2002 Nov 17]).
- DELAMOTHE, T., 2000, Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. British Medical Journal, 321, 843– 844.
- WILSON, P. and RISK, A., 2002, How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. Commentary: on the way of quality. British Medical Journal, 324, 598– 602.
- BRITISH HEALTHCARE INTERNET ASSOCIATION, 2002, Quality standards for medical publishing on the web. URL: http://www.bhia.org/reference/documents/recommend_webquality.htm [accessed 2002 Nov 17]. User preference as quality markers 193
- WINKER, M. A., FLANAGIN, A., CHI-LUM, B., WHITE, J., ANDREWS, K., KENNETT, R. L., DEANGELIS, C. D. and MUSSACHIO, R. A., 2000, Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1600– 1606.
- HON CODE OF CONDUCT (HONcode) FORMEDICAL AND HEALTHWEB SITES, 2002, URL: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html [accessed 2002 Nov 17].
- TURNITIN.COM, 2002, The world’s leading plagiarism prevention system. URL: http://www.turnitin. com/ [accessed 2002 Nov 17].
- EYSENBACH, G. and DIEPGEN, T., 1998, Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. British Medical Journal, 317, 1496– 1502.
- FOSTER, W. R., 1995, Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals. Lancet, 346, 1300– 1301.
- SEARCHING FOR GOOGLE’S SUCCESS, 2002, URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-201- 7340905-0.html [accessed 2002 Nov 17].
- MERIC, F., BERNSTAM, E. V., MIRZA, N. Q., HUNT, K. K., AMES, F. C., ROSS, M. I., KUERER, H. M., POLLOCK, R. E., MUSEN, M. A. and SINGLETARY, S. E., 2002, Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. British Medical Journal, 324, 577– 581.
- HUBERMAN, B. A., PIROLLI, P. L. T., PITKOW, J. E. and LUKOSE, R. M., 1998, Strong regularities in world wide web surfing. Science, 280, 95– 97.