58
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A quality evaluation methodology of health web-pages for non-professionals

, , , , , & show all
Pages 95-107 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • LA PORTE, R. E., 1994, Global public health and the information superhighway. British Medical Journal, 308, 1651– 1652.
  • KASSIRER, J. P., 1995, The next transformation in the delivery of health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 332(1), 52– 54.
  • FIKAR, C. R., 1996, The Internet and the pediatrician: should there be a connection? Clinical Pediatrics, 35(5), 229– 235.
  • IZENBERG, N. and LIEBERMAN, D. A., 1998, The Web, communication trends, and children’s health. Clinical Pediatrics, 37, 153– 158.
  • EYSENBACH, G. andDIEPGEN, T. L., 1998, Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. British Medical Journal, 317, 1496– 1502.
  • IMPICCIATORE, P., PANDOLFINI, C., CASELLA, N. and BONATI, M., 1997, Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. British Medical Journal, 314, 1875– 1879.
  • MCLUNG, H. J., MURRAY, R. D. and HEITLINGER, L. A., 1998, The Internet as a source for current patient information. Pediatrics, 101 (2),URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/egi/content/full/ 101/6/e2
  • PANDOLFINI, C., IMPICCIATORE, P. and BONATI,M., 2000, Parents on theweb: risks for quality management of cough in children. Pediatrics, 105 (2),URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/egi/content/ full/105/1/e1
  • CURRO`, V., MAURO, V., BUONUOMO, P. S., MASTROIACOVO, P., BERNABEI, A. and D’ATRI, A., 2000, Accessing information on medical/health web sites by Italian families: a pilot study. Clinical Pediatrics, 39(1), 68 – 69. [Medline]
  • C-H-I-Q. Guidelines for producing and maintaining patient information on conditions and treatments. URL http://www.hfht.org/chiq/guidelines.htm [last access 2002 Feb 28]
  • NetScoring: criteria to assess the quality of Health Internet information. URL: http://www. chu-rouen.fr/dsii/publi/netscoring.html [last access 2002 Feb 28]
  • HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, MITRETEK SYSTEMS. Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet; URL: http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/criteria.html [last access 2002 Feb 11]
  • DUMAN, M. and FARRELL, C., 2000, The POPPi Guide. Practicalities of producing patient information (King’s Fund).
  • DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. URL: http://www.discern.org.uk/journalepidemiology.htm [last access 2002 Feb 28]
  • QUICK. The Quality Information Checklist. URL: http://www.quick.org.uk/menu.htm [last access 2002 Feb 28]
  • RISK, A. and DZENOWAGIS, J., 2001, Review of Internet Health Information. Quality Initiatives; URL: http://www.jmir.org/2001/4/e28/index.htm
  • COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES. AAP. Group A Streptococcal Infections, 1997 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 24th ed.: 483 – 494.
  • KIM, P., ENG, T. R., DEERING, M. J. and MAXFIELD, A., 1999, Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: a review. British Medical Journal, 318, 647– 649.
  • Centro di Ricerca sui Sistemi Informativi LUISS ‘‘Guido Carli’’ – Material for this paper URL: http://cersi.luiss.it/ped/meth/
  • STATA CORP. (1999): STATA Statistical Software: release 6.0 (College Station, TX: Stata Corporation).
  • TERRY, N. P., 2000, Rating the ‘‘Raters’’: Legal Exposure of Trustmark Authorities in the Context of Consumer Health Informatics. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2000/3/e18/index.htm
  • HEALTH ON THE NET FOUNDATION. HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. URL: http://www.hon.ch/Survey/analysis.html [last access 2002 Feb 28]
  • OMNI: The UK’s Gateway to High Quality Internet Resources in Health and Medicine. URL: http://omni.ac.uk [last access 2002 Feb 28]
  • SILBERG, W. M., LUNDBERG, G. D. andMUSACCHIO, R. A., 1997, Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA, 277 (2),1244 – 1245 [Medline]
  • ABBOTT, V. P., 2000, Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of explanatory findings. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22(2), 191 – 197. [Medline]
  • LIKERT, RENSIS, 1932, A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psychology, 140 (June 1932), 5 – 53.
  • ISI Web of Knowledge, URL: www.isinet.com [last access 2002 Dec 5]
  • HERNA´ NDEZ-BORGES, A. A., MACI´AS-CERVI, P., GASPAR-GUARDADO, M. A., TORRES-A´ LVAREZ DE ARCAYA, M. L., RUIZ-RABAZA, A. and JIME´NEZ-SOSA, A., 1998, Can Examination of WWW Usage Statistics and other Indirect Quality Indicators Help to Distinguish the Relative Quality of Medical websites? URL: http://www.jmir.org/1999/1/e1/index.htm
  • CUI LEI, 1999, Rating Health Web sites using the principles of Citation Analysis: A Bibliometric Approach, URL: http://www.jmir.org/1999/1/e4/index.htm
  • KAMEL BOULOS, M. N., ROUDSARI, A. V., GORDON, C. andMUIR GRAY, J. A., 2001, The use of quality benchmarking in assessing web resources for the Dermatology Virtual Branch Library of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Journal ofMedical Internet Research, 3 (2),e5 URL: http://www.jmir.org/2001/1/e5/index.htm

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.