Why are structured data different? Relating differences in data representation to the rationale of OpenSDE

References

• Weed L L. Medical records that guide and teach. New England Journal of Medicine 1968; 278(11)593–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Revised edition, R S Dick, E B Steen, D E Detmer. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1997
   Google Scholar
• van Ginneken A M. The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002; 65(2)97–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powsner S M, Wyatt J C, Wright P. Opportunities for and challenges of computerisation. Lancet 1998; 352(9140)1617–1622
   Google Scholar
• Brown P J, Sönksen P. Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 7(4)392–403
   Google Scholar
• Tange H. How to approach the structuring of the medical record? Towards a model for flexible access to free text medical data. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 1996; 42(1 – 2)27–34
   Google Scholar
• Walsh S H. The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. British Medical Journal 2004; 328(7449)1184–1187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tange H J, Hasman A, de Vries Robbe P F, Schouten H C. Medical narratives in electronic medical records. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1997; 46(1)7–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer J. Conceptual graphs as an operational model for descriptive findings. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1992; 214–218
   Google Scholar
• Lovis C, Baud R H, Planche P. Power of expression in the electronic patient record: structured data or narrative text?. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2000, 58 – 59: 101–110
   Google Scholar
• Moorman P W, van Ginneken A M, van der Lei J, van Bemmel J H. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptional knowledge. Methods of Information in Medicine 1994; 33(5)454–463
   Google Scholar
• Los R K, van Ginneken A M, de Wilde M, van der Lei J. OpenSDE: row modeling applied to generic structured data entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004; 11(2)162–165
   Google Scholar
• OpenSDE. OpenSDE (OSS). Available from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/opensde (accessed 24 August 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Beard C M, Yunginger J W, Reed C E, O'Connell E J, Silverstein M D. Interobserver variability in medical record review: an epidemiological study of asthma. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1992; 45(9)1013–1020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stausberg J, Koch D, Ingenerf J, Betzler M. Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003; 10(5)470–477
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz R I, Yu E C. Assessing the reliability of epidemiologic data obtained from medical records. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1984; 37(11)825–831
   Google Scholar
• Doupi P, van der Lei J. Towards personalized Internet health information: the STEPPS architecture. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2002; 27(3)139–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los R K, van Ginneken A M, van der Lei J. OpenSDE: A strategy for expressive and flexible structured data entry. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005; 74(6)481–490
   Google Scholar
• Roukema J, Los R K, Bleeker S E, van Ginneken A M, van der Lei J, Moll H A. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics. Pediatrics 2006; 117(1)15–21
   Google Scholar
• Doupi P, van Ginneken A M. Structured physical examination data: a modeling challenge. Medinfo 2001; 10(Pt 1)614–618
   Google Scholar
• Duftschmid G, Gall W, Eigenbauer E, Dorda W. Management of data from clinical trials using the ArchiMed system. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2002; 27(2)85–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni P M, Brandt C, Frawley S, Sayward F G, Einbinder R, Zelterman D, Schacter L, Miller P L. Managing attribute—value clinical trials data using the ACT/DB client-server database system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1998; 5(2)139–151
   Google Scholar
• Ganslandt T, Mueller M, Krieglstein C F, Senninger N, Prokosch H U. A flexible repository for clinical trial data based on an entity-attribute-value model. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium 1999; 1064–1067
   Google Scholar
• Miller P L, Nadkarni P, Singer M, Marenco L, Hines M, Shepherd G. Integration of multidisciplinary sensory data: a pilot model of the human brain project approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001; 8(1)34–48
   Google Scholar
• Roukema J, van Ginneken A M, Moll H A. The use of structured data entry in the outpatient's clinic for paediatrics. Health Information Developments in the Netherlands 2003; 6: 27–30
   Google Scholar
• Moorman P W, Siersema P D, de Ridder M A, van Ginneken A M. How often is large smaller than small. Lancet 1995; 345(8953)865
   Google Scholar
• Rector A L, Nowlan W A, Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Methods of Information in Medicine 1991; 30(3)179–186
   Google Scholar
• McDonald C J. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997; 4(3)213–221
   Google Scholar
• Gregory J, Mattison J E, Linde C. Naming notes: transitions from free text to structured entry. Methods of Information in Medicine 1995; 34(1 – 2)57–67
   Google Scholar